tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7583674511519808833.post230622314484316492..comments2024-03-27T00:26:19.644+00:00Comments on Rosa Rubicondior: Mad Manny Gets Another WarningRosa Rubicondiorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06063268216781988588noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7583674511519808833.post-87162297717444318412015-01-12T07:39:34.798+00:002015-01-12T07:39:34.798+00:00Manny has proved himself incapable of rational, lo...Manny has proved himself incapable of rational, logical debate above the level of an eight year-old but if ever he feels grown up enough to try my challenge to him is still there at <a href="http://rosarubicondior.blogspot.com/2012/08/debate-is-there-scientific-evidence.html" rel="nofollow">Debate: Is There Scientific Evidence Only For The Christian God?</a> All he need do is present what he claims is his evidence and explain why it meets the criteria for his claimed proof that the Christian god exists and no others do. Those criteria are given in the above link. <br /><br />He won't of course because, by his behavior, we can see he no more believes the Christian god is watching him and will be taking him to task later that I do. He's a fraud using pretend piety as a cover just as he would have done had he not been caught and expelled from seminary before he could emulate so many other abusive Catholic priests and abuse his trusted access to vulnerable people.Rosa Rubicondiorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06063268216781988588noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7583674511519808833.post-88555648236393525332015-01-11T21:30:40.272+00:002015-01-11T21:30:40.272+00:00Why haven't you debated him on Google hangouts...Why haven't you debated him on Google hangouts where there is no moderation or opportunity to alter anything? That would be fun to watch on YouTube. He seems to be taking your posts as promotion for himself. Apparently your posts and the posts of others are bringing him blog hits. He posted this recently: <a href="%E2%80%9Dwww.sacerdotus.com/2015/01/spike-in-hits.html/%E2%80%9D" rel="nofollow">Atheists Help Sacerdotus</a><br /><br />Also, Twitter's support is run by algorithms. So in effect, anyone can get suspended with persistence. This doesn't mean that accounts all originate from one person or that an account is necessarily breaking TOS. One can report 5 different accounts stating each belong to one individual and if you persist in the reporting, they all will be suspended. Religious people can easily target atheists and mass suspend them. This is a problem Twitter has and is why Instagram is beating it in membership. Cheers!Skeptichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00975762339629951706noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7583674511519808833.post-986313582633558512014-12-17T14:05:28.253+00:002014-12-17T14:05:28.253+00:00That's his MO. I once woke up to fid Manny had...That's his MO. I once woke up to fid Manny had challenged me at about 3 a.m. GMT. Spammed me with abuse every couple of minutes claiming I was too cowardly to debate him, and declared victory, all in about twenty minutes. He ran screaming hysterically when I accepted his challenge as can be seen <a href="http://rosarubicondior.blogspot.com/2012/08/debate-is-there-scientific-evidence.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>. He hasn't recovered yet poor thing. Rosa Rubicondiorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06063268216781988588noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7583674511519808833.post-5986598934138128562014-12-17T09:12:27.305+00:002014-12-17T09:12:27.305+00:00Reminds me of what you can read in this link from ...Reminds me of what you can read in this link from Twitter: https://twitter.com/danarel/status/538422962626764800/photo/1 . In that Twitter flow we can see that Manny invites to a debate with him at 2:30 a.m. Who of us are not longing for having a debate with him just in the middle of the night? Manny couldn't have suggested/chosen a better time - or could he? Helmer von Helvetehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02136543309048013677noreply@blogger.com