tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7583674511519808833.post7427956892042621952..comments2024-03-16T23:22:45.187+00:00Comments on Rosa Rubicondior: Science vs Religion - A Relative DifferenceRosa Rubicondiorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06063268216781988588noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7583674511519808833.post-64874619070659968592012-02-25T22:10:05.278+00:002012-02-25T22:10:05.278+00:00Here's a little essay on 'Nothing' tha...Here's a little essay on 'Nothing' that I prepared earlier :-) http://rosarubicondior.blogspot.com/2012/02/much-ado-about-nothing.htmlRosa Rubicondiorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06063268216781988588noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7583674511519808833.post-7097477958461919732012-02-25T21:41:37.253+00:002012-02-25T21:41:37.253+00:00It always amazes me how utterly counter-intuitive ...It always amazes me how utterly counter-intuitive the concept of "no" before the universe, or "no" outside the universe is to those who desperately need to imagine a creator. Then, if one brings the question of how could information or influence traverse the "Primeval atom" the singularity, or the inflationary period into the conversation, well, one can almost hear the breakers trip in their minds.<br /><br />Yes, I think, and have always thought, as did Georges Lemaïtre, that his Big Bang concept didn't necessitate a creator. Alas, I have now come to hold to the idea that the Big Bang, singularity, and inflationary period actually negate any possibility of a creator unless it can be shown that the universe could be created from within, yet prior to the existence of, the universe which I think is absurd, but hey, I'm open.<br /><br />And that's science.Beachbumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16872466812837980647noreply@blogger.com