Human Evolution in Africa
A Forgotten Settlement in 'The Cradle of Humankind'
A Forgotten Settlement in 'The Cradle of Humankind'
Human Evolution in Africa
A Forgotten Settlement in 'The Cradle of Humankind'
A Forgotten Settlement in 'The Cradle of Humankind'
Human Evolution in Africa
A Forgotten Settlement in 'The Cradle of Humankind'
A Forgotten Settlement in 'The Cradle of Humankind'
Human Evolution in Africa
A Forgotten Settlement in 'The Cradle of Humankind'
A Forgotten Settlement in 'The Cradle of Humankind'
A Forgotten settlement in the Cradle of Humankind adds a note to southern African history
Four different Australopithecus crania that were found in the Sterkfontein caves, South Africa. The Sterkfontein cave fill containing this and other Australopithecus fossils was dated to 3.4 to 3.6 million years ago.
Driefontein is a cave system located in the Cradle of Humankind, a World Heritage Site in Gauteng, South Africa. The Cradle of Humankind is a paleontological site that is home to some of the world's most important hominid fossil finds, including the fossils of "Mrs. Ples" and "Little Foot."In the following article, reprinted from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license, Tim Forssman, Senior lecturer, University of Pretoria, South Africa, explains the significance of the site in the story of the evolution of modern humans.
The Driefontein cave system has been of particular interest to paleontologists because of the discovery of early hominid fossils there. The fossils found at Driefontein date back over 2 million years, and include specimens from several species, including Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus.
One of the most notable discoveries made at Driefontein was that of the "Little Foot" skeleton, which was found in the Sterkfontein Caves in 1994. Little Foot is an almost complete Australopithecus skeleton, estimated to be around 3.67 million years old, making it one of the oldest hominid fossils ever found.
The Cradle of Humankind is a significant site for the study of human evolution and the history of life on Earth. Its importance has been recognized by UNESCO, which designated it a World Heritage Site in 1999.
References:
- "Driefontein, Cradle of Humankind." South African Heritage Resources Agency. https://www.sahra.org.za/sahris/sites/77811012-740e-4d30-9c17-9b21ef4d3b53
- "The Cradle of Humankind: Driefontein Cave." South African Tourism. https://www.southafrica.net/gl/en/travel/article/the-cradle-of-humankind-driefontein-cave
- "Little Foot, Sterkfontein Caves, South Africa." University of Witwatersrand. https://www.littlefoot.org.za/
ChatGPT.(6 Apr 2023) "Tell me about the Driefontein 'Cradle of Humankind', in South Africa, with references."
Retrieved from https://chat.openai.com/chat
"Mrs. Ples" and "Little Foot" are two important hominid fossils found in the Cradle of Humankind in South Africa.
- "Mrs. Ples":
"Mrs. Ples" is the nickname given to a fossil skull discovered in 1947 by paleontologist Robert Broom at the Sterkfontein Caves, which are part of the Cradle of Humankind. The fossil is officially known as StW 5, and is believed to be around 2.05 million years old. "Mrs. Ples" is believed to be a member of the species Australopithecus africanus, and is one of the most complete early hominid skulls ever found.- "Little Foot":
"Little Foot" is the nickname given to a nearly complete Australopithecus skeleton discovered in the Sterkfontein Caves in 1994. The fossil is officially known as StW 573, and is believed to be around 3.67 million years old, making it one of the oldest hominid fossils ever found. The discovery of "Little Foot" is significant because it provides important insights into the evolution of bipedalism, or walking on two legs. The skeleton is also notable for being nearly complete, which is rare in the field of paleoanthropology.References:
- "Mrs. Ples." Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History. https://naturalhistory.si.edu/education/teaching-resources/life-science/origins-humankind/mrs-ples
- "Little Foot, Sterkfontein Caves, South Africa." University of Witwatersrand. https://www.littlefoot.org.za/
- "Little Foot: A Rare Look at One of the World's Oldest Skeletons." National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2018/12/little-foot-fossil-stw-573-australopithecus-south-africa-human-origins/
ChatGPT. (6 Apr 2023) "Tell me more about the fossils 'Mrs Ples' and 'Little Foot', with references, please."
Retrieved from https://chat.openai.com/chat
The article has been reformatted for stylistic consistency.
A Forgotten settlement in the Cradle of Humankind adds a note to southern African history
Tim Forssman
Researchers examined the traces of what was likely a human settlement in the Cradle of Humankind.
Tim Forssman
Tim Forssman, University of Pretoria
About 50km outside South Africa’s biggest city, Johannesburg, lies one of the most important sites in human prehistory: the Cradle of Humankind. Here, at sites like the Sterkfontein Caves, Swartkrans, Drimolen and Kromdraai, researchers have unearthed amazing fossil evidence from the Plio-Pleistocene (the last five million years). It is especially famous for the discovery of fossilised hominin – ancient human – remains.
But there is a more recent and largely neglected layer to the landscape’s history. My colleagues and I set out to investigate some archaeological traces found in part of the Cradle of Humankind. We focused on a stone-walled structure on a hill known as Driefontein; the name also given to the site we studied.
Our findings suggest that the Driefontein stone-walled structure was a residential area. It appears similar to settlements found elsewhere in South Africa’s North West province and parts of Botswana dating to between AD 1450 and 1700, though certain features possibly suggest a later date. These findings place the settlement’s occupation broadly within the “Tswana” period. This refers to roughly the last 500 years of history when Tswana communities, a southern African ethnic group, arose.
While the prehistoric sequence of the Cradle of Humankind operates at several levels spanning a very long period of time, a disproportionate amount of resources have been allocated to studies concerning human evolution and early stone tool technologies.
While this has global significance, our work is important, too, because it sheds light on heritage traces that reveal much about people’s daily lives. It also helps us understand local, traumatic pasts which involved colonial oppression, land dispossession and racial policies.
Cultural remains such as those found at Driefontein allow archaeology to peel back historical discourse to reveal people’s pasts that are not preserved in any other way.
Mapping the settlement
Our work at the settlement involved an intensive mapping programme conducted over four successive visits. Initially we determined the overall size of the settlement, in order to plan our field programme, and then we examined the layout of the homestead’s dry-packed stone-walled architecture.
To record the site, maps were produced using a combination of handheld GPSs and a Trimble Station; these use satellites to record geo-specific points that can be rendered digitally to resemble the settlement’s structure and features.
An enclosure inside the western settlement likely used as a kraal for livestock.
Tim Forssman
By examining the structure of Driefontein, we could then match its architecture to typologies developed over the past 60 years and determine when it was occupied. We can also infer the use of different areas of the site.
There are other ways of doing this, such as through ceramic analysis or archaeological excavations, but at Driefontein very few items remain on the surface and there is no excavatable deposit.
However, two middens were identified. These were used as dump sites and often contain valuable archaeological material such as ceramic sherds, food waste, and personal ornaments. Unfortunately, at Driefontein this was not the case; this meant that studying the walls’ layout was the only viable way of learning more about the history of the site.
Driefontein includes two distinct areas; what we call west and east. Both have large circular structures outside the main walled area. These may have been kraals (enclosures) for livestock. The main portions of the two areas both have an internal walled area with separate smaller enclosures attached. Around this is a discontinuous and scalloping boundary wall. Between it and the inner enclosure are up to 20 individual huts, including several with outside terraces. These are indicated by upright rocks erected in a circular shape with extensions where terraces exist.
There are also grain bin foundations in the vicinity of several huts, which are similar in construction to the huts but are far smaller.
Upright rocks indicate the presence of a hut, since disappeared, with this one possessing a front terrace.
Tim Forssman
Though the settlement’s occupation falls within the “Tswana” period, naming the occupants as Tswana is complicated. That’s because Tswana history is not linear or direct. Rather, there are periods of migration, political growth and assimilation. Tswana origins are also unclear. At times, oral histories note multiple lineages and totems with several different groups appearing and blending with others.
When looking back at early archaeological sequences, such as may be the case at Driefontein, identifying “Tswana” groups is, for these reasons, quite challenging. Nonetheless, based on the evidence, we believe Driefontein was likely occupied by Tswana-like groups after about AD 1450.
Complex histories
This project was done with the involvement of the current landowners of the Nirox Sculpture Park and Project 58, where the site is located. Their interest in the site and openness to researchers is what ultimately led to us learning more of the region’s prehistory.
Our work is far from over. Future studies at Driefontein will help to further acknowledge more recent complex histories, identities and pasts that overlay the deep-time sequences preserved in the Cradle of Humankind’s cave systems.
Tim Forssman, Senior lecturer, University of Pretoria
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
What a completely different and far more complex story of humankind that gives us, compared to the childish creationist mythology involving magic, people with no parents and everyone sharing a single ancestral couple but with a genome that just looks like it evolved in Africa from a common ancestor with the other African apes.
Refuting Creationism: Why Creationism Fails In Both Its Science And Its Theology
A systematic refutation of creationism, exposing the childish parodies, fallacies and pseudo-science that underpins it. This book takes the reader through the major themes of creationism from the Big Bang, through abiogenesis and the origin of the genetic code, the evidence for evolution, falsifying the claims of creationism with scientific evidence. Also exposed is the deliberate disinformation to be found on creationist websites and publications and the absurdity of the belief that the Bible, particularly the origin myths in Genesis, is real science and genuine history, written or inspired by an omniscient, inerrant creator god
Available in Hardcover, Paperback or ebook for Kindle
This book presents the reader with multiple examples of why, even if we accept Creationism's putative intelligent designer, any such entity can only be regarded as malevolent, designing ever-more ingenious ways to make life difficult for living things, including humans, for no other reason than the sheer pleasure of doing so. This putative creator has also given other creatures much better things like immune systems, eyesight and ability to regenerate limbs that it could have given to all its creation, including humans, but chose not to. This book will leave creationists with the dilemma of explaining why evolution by natural selection is the only plausible explanation for so many nasty little parasites that doesn't leave their creator looking like an ingenious, sadistic, misanthropic, malevolence finding ever more ways to increase pain and suffering in the world, and not the omnibenevolent, maximally good god that Creationists of all Abrahamic religions believe created everything. As with a previous book by this author, "The Unintelligent Designer: Refuting the Intelligent Design Hoax", this book comprehensively refutes any notion of intelligent design by anything resembling a loving, intelligent and maximally good god. Such evil could not exist in a universe created by such a god. Evil exists, therefore a maximally good, all-knowing, all-loving god does not.
Illustrated by Catherine Webber-Hounslow.
Available in Hardcover, Paperback or ebook for Kindle
Illustrated by Catherine Webber-Hounslow.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Obscene, threatening or obnoxious messages, preaching, abuse and spam will be removed, as will anything by known Internet trolls and stalkers, by known sock-puppet accounts and anything not connected with the post,
A claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Remember: your opinion is not an established fact unless corroborated.