F Rosa Rubicondior: Matthew's Silly Gospel

Matthew's Silly Gospel

This page links to blog posts about the 'Gospel of Matthew'.

Of all the books in the New Testament, the 'Gospel of Matthew' must rate as the worst in the way it presents Jesus and the main events in his alleged life. Whoever wrote 'Matthew' - and there is nothing to suggest it was Matthew the legendary tax collector and disciple of Jesus - appears to have drawn on sources available to both Mark and Luke (the hypothetical and assumed lost 'Q' source) plus an earlier different source (the 'M' source).

It was also probably written by at least two people, as there is some evidence that the first two chapters were added later. Some authorities think elements of 'Matthew' may be based on an Ebionite gospel (i.e. a statement of dogma) and that the Ebionites may have been successors to the ultra-orthodox Jewish Nazarene sect led by James 'the brother of Jesus' and possibly the first 'bishop' (i.e. leader of the sect) in Jerusalem, hence his emphasis on the Jewishness of Jesus, the fulfillment of Jewish prophecies, and on obedience to the Mosaic Law.

The reason 'Matthew' was included in the final version of the Bible was because people had become convinced that it was written by Jesus' disciple of that name and it didn't deviate too far from the Pauline Orthodox view.

The author's over-riding intent appears to have been to show the Jewishness of Jesus and how just about everything about him was a fulfilment of Jewish prophesy. He clearly is trying to establish that Jesus was the Jewish Messiah. In pursuit of this end he often stretches credulity beyond breaking point and loses sight of the fact that he should also have been presenting Jesus as a wise man. In some of his stories, Jesus frankly comes across as a bit of a nutter.

Of course, the author of 'Matthew' can't be blamed for what the other 'Gospel' authors said but 'Matthew' often flatly contradicts other writers and so raises serious questions about the authenticity of all the 'Gospels'. Clearly, if the different versions of stories don't line up and there is no way to resolve the differences into one coherent narrative, there is no reason to believe one over another, and, if one version can be wrong and a clear invention - the product of its authors creative imagination - then so can all of them. Revealing an underlying political motive, as 'Matthew' often does, calls the entire New Testament into question too, since it was compiled by the winners of this political struggle.

Pull The Other One Matthew!. How 'Matthew' looked for a prophesy of a virgin birth and was either mislead by a bad translation from Hebrew into Greek, or mistranslated it himself. This blunder occurs in one of the first two chapters, which may have been added later to an earlier version.

Hey Christians! Is Matthew For Real? How 'Matthew' effectively debunks any claim that his account of the resurrection of Jesus was that of an eye-witness to the events.

Foolish Jesus And The Ravening Wolves. Where 'Matthew' presents Jesus as a foolish man and false prophet.

Christians - Try Not To Think About Matthew. The thought is equal to the deed, so we're all done for!

Are These The Silliest Verses In The Bible? Thomas Paine's destruction of Matthew's account of the crucifixion.

Now It's Jesus The False Prophet! Matthew blunders again. He relates how Jesus said his 12 disciples would judge the 12 tribes, forgetting about Judas.

Matthew Makes An Ass Of Jesus. Matthew bends over too far to make a prophesy fit the story of the 'Triumphal Entry Into Jerusalem' and makes Jesus look like the village idiot.


Ten Reasons To Lose Faith: And Why You Are Better Off Without It

This book explains why faith is a fallacy and serves no useful purpose other than providing an excuse for pretending to know things that are unknown. It also explains how losing faith liberates former sufferers from fear, delusion, and the control of others, freeing them to see the world in a different light, to recognise the injustices that religions cause and to accept people for who they are, not which group they happened to be born in. A society based on atheist, Humanist principles would be a less divided, more inclusive, more peaceful society and one more appreciative of the one opportunity that life gives us to enjoy and wonder at the world we live in.

Available in Hardcover, Paperback or ebook for Kindle


What Makes You So Special? From The Big Bang To You

How did you come to be here, now? This books takes you from the Big Bang to the evolution of modern humans and the history of human cultures, showing that science is an adventure of discovery and a source of limitless wonder, giving us richer and more rewarding appreciation of the phenomenal privilege of merely being alive and able to begin to understand it all.

Available in Hardcover, Paperback or ebook for Kindle


Thank you for sharing!

submit to reddit


  1. Yes some of the Matthew gospel seems off the wall. The first post on my blog addresses the time Jesus sent Matthew off to the lake to take a coin from the mouth of a fish back to the collectors of the temple tax. The reality is that the Matthew gospel in like manner to the other three gospels is written in the same literary form as the books of the OT. When they are all read in there intended literary form the teachings are amazing. The writers of the OT as well as those of the NT inform us that the Lord speaks to us in parables. They are telling the truth, for all of the OT and NT books, letters and gospel texts are presented as parableStories. I present within onlyinparables a parableStory from the John gospel and one from the Letter of James. Again, you will find the teachings to be amazing. Blessings to you and your blog, Mike Carrell

  2. quote "and was either mislead by a bad translation from Hebrew into Greek, or mistranslated it himself"
    Not only Matthew's shortcoming. The whole Genesis has been mistranslated after the novel Gilgamesh was published...

    Has anyone noticed that 'loose bible interpretations' are becoming a trend? First there was Life of Brian. More recently Aaron Aronofsky created the cinema blockbuster Noah, based on his own graphic novel. The biggest surprise are his Nephilim. Here they are the 'good guys'. They look like organic Transformers, and with their powers they help Noah to keep the Ark out of the hands of tyrant Tubal-cain and his followers, after which the Nephies are rewarded with a return to Heaven. What Aronofsky forgot (or ignored) is that the Nephilim were the main reason for God to cleanse the earth and start all over again. So after the devils and demons rejoined their brethren in Heaven there was no real reason any more to open the mighty faucets...

    But the most Church-shattering version comes from another graphic novel: 'The Goddamned'. This is no Marvel stuff, and the series is perhaps just because of that an enormous hit. It centers around Cain who regrets having murdered Abel and suffers under his divine punishment: eternal life. He can't be killed.
    But his antediluvian habitat is a Hell on earth. It resembles Mad Max's world in overdrive but without the cars and machines (and with lots more mud 'n blood 'n rotting corpses). It's like an Armageddonian aftermath, and the people living there do nothing but torturing and raping and slaughtering each other. According to the Hebrew scriptures Cain remained faithful to Jahweh, not so this Cain. He is a bitter man, accusing God to be a first rate bungler and a*hole (retorically, he and the Creator or not in contact with each other).
    Another central role is for Noah. Not the wise and stern patriarch from the bible, but a real treacherous son of a b*.
    Despite the self-destructive elements and the uncensored language, the profane story manages to be quite subtle. Look it up, if you can stomach the graphic violence and the explicit nudity. The Goddamned is a stunning work.


Obscene, threatening or obnoxious messages, preaching, abuse and spam will be removed, as will anything by known Internet trolls and stalkers, by known sock-puppet accounts and anything not connected with the post,

A claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Remember: your opinion is not an established fact unless corroborated.

Web Analytics