An artist's rendering shows the first-ever portrait of a Denisovan woman, recreated from an ancient DNA sample.
Maayan Harel.
The proposed evolutionary history of MUC19.
The Denisovan-like haplotype (in orange) was first introgressed from Denisovans into Neanderthals and then introgressed into modern humans. The introgressed haplotype later experienced positive selection in populations from the Americas. The introgressed MUC19 haplotype is composed of a 742-kb region that contains Neanderthal-specific variants (blue). Embedded within this Neanderthal-like region is a 72-kb region containing a high density of Denisovan-specific variants (orange), and an exonic variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) region (gray). The box below the 742-kb region depicts zooming into the MUC19 VNTR region, in which admixed American individuals carry an elevated number of tandem repeat copies.
Another day; another scientific paper showing the Bible to be wrong — not just slightly wrong, but fundamentally, demonstrably, and irretrievably wrong.
This latest blow comes from researchers at Brown University, who have traced a variant of the gene MUC19, originally identified in the extinct archaic hominins known as Denisovans, and found it alive and well today in modern Latin Americans with Indigenous ancestry. They also detected it in ancient DNA recovered from archaeological sites across both North and South America.
The variant is far too common in modern populations to be a trivial accident. Its persistence screams survival advantage. Natural selection has kept it in play because it helps its carriers thrive in the environments the earliest migrants into the Americas encountered.
What does MUC19 do? It helps build mucus — not glamorous, but life-saving. From the saliva that begins digestion to the mucosal barriers in the gut and respiratory tract that fend off infection, this gene equips its owners with a stronger shield against disease.
And where did it come from? The Denisovans. But it likely reached us by way of Neanderthals, with whom Homo sapiens also interbred. In other words, modern humans are not some isolated “special creation” freshly minted out of clay a few thousand years ago; we are a patchwork of lineages, woven together by repeated episodes of interbreeding over tens of thousands of years.
For creationists, this paper is a nightmare. First, the scientists are explicit: the explanation rests entirely on Evolution and the blind, natural processes that drive it. Second, the mere fact that extinct species like Denisovans and Neanderthals could successfully mate with our ancestors drives a stake through the heart of biblical literalism. Instead of Adam and Eve, what we see is gradual emergence — modern humans arising by incomplete speciation across a broad geographical spread, with genes flowing back and forth whenever populations met again. This pattern repeats itself throughout hominin history, and it unfolds on a timeline that makes the biblical six-thousand-year fantasy look laughably naïve.
The MUC19 Gene
What it is:
MUC19 belongs to the mucin family of genes. Mucins are large, heavily glycosylated proteins that make up mucus — the slimy, protective coating that lines our respiratory, digestive, and reproductive tracts.
Function:
MUC19 helps produce the gel-like consistency of mucus, contributing to:
Lubrication of food in the mouth (via saliva).
Protection of epithelial surfaces from pathogens.
Formation of mucosal barriers that trap microbes and particles before they can cause infection.
Evolutionary origins:
The mucin gene family is ancient, with roots stretching back hundreds of millions of years in vertebrates.
MUC19 itself arose by gene duplication and diversification within this family. Different mucins have been recruited for specialised roles — for example, MUC2 in the gut and MUC5 in the lungs.
The Denisovan variant of MUC19 is one such adaptation, likely honed in Ice Age Eurasia where pathogens and harsh environments placed strong selective pressures on immune defences.
Human inheritance:
Genetic evidence suggests that Homo sapiens acquired this variant of MUC19 through introgression — the flow of genes from Denisovans (probably via Neanderthals) into the modern human gene pool.
The variant persisted at high frequencies in the Americas because it provided a survival advantage against local environmental challenges.
Why it matters:
The story of MUC19 illustrates how evolution works not only through slow accumulation of mutations, but also by horizontal gene transfers from related species. Human biology today is a mosaic assembled from many ancestral sources.
The research team, led by Professor Emilia Huerta-Sánchez of Brown University’s Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, have published their findings in Science, with further details explained in a Brown University news release by Kevin Stacey.
Another brick out of the crumbling wall of creationist delusion; another win for science.
Extinct human relatives left a genetic gift that helped people thrive in the AmericasA new study found that a gene passed down from extinct archaic humans provided an adaptive advantage for Indigenous people of the Americas and is still common today in people of Indigenous descent.
A new study provides fresh evidence that ancient interbreeding with archaic human species may have provided modern humans with a genetic variant that helped them adapt to new environments as they dispersed across the globe.
The study, published in Science, focused on a gene known as MUC19, which is involved in the production of proteins that form saliva and mucosal barriers in the respiratory and digestive tracts. The researchers show that a variant of that gene derived from Denisovans, an enigmatic species of archaic humans, is present in modern Latin Americans with Indigenous American ancestry, as well as in DNA collected from individuals excavated at archeological sites across North and South America.
The frequency at which the gene appears in modern human populations suggests the gene was under significant natural selection, meaning it provided a survival or reproductive advantage to those who carried it. It’s not clear exactly what that advantage might have been — but given the gene’s involvement in immune processes, it may have helped populations fight off pathogens encountered as they migrated into the Americas thousands of years ago.
From an evolutionary standpoint, this finding shows how ancient interbreeding can have effects that we still see today. From a biological standpoint, we identify a gene that appears to be adaptive, but whose function hasn’t yet been characterized. We hope that leads to additional study of what this gene is actually doing.
Professor Emilia Huerta-Sánchez, senior author.
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology
Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Not much is known about the Denisovans, who lived in Asia between 300,000 and 30,000 years ago, aside from a few small fossils from Denisova cave in Siberia, two jaw bones found in Tibet and Taiwan, and a nearly complete skull from China found this year. A finger fossil from Siberia contained ancient DNA, which has enabled scientists to look for common genes between Denisovans and modern humans. Prior research led by Huerta-Sánchez found that a version of a gene called EPAS1 acquired from Denisovans may have helped Sherpas and other Tibetans to adapt to high altitudes.
For this study, the researchers compared Denisovan DNA with modern genomes collected through the 1,000 Genomes Project, a survey of worldwide genetic variation. The researchers found that the Denisovan-derived MUC19 gene is present in high frequencies in Latino populations who harbor Indigenous American genetic ancestry. The researchers also looked for the gene in the DNA of 23 individuals collected from archeological sites in Alaska, California, Mexico and elsewhere in the Americas. The Denisovan-derived variant was present at high frequency in these ancient individuals as well.
The team used several independent statistical tests to show that the Denisovan MUC19 gene variant rose to unusually high frequencies in ancient Indigenous American populations and present-day people of Indigenous descent, and that the gene sits on an unusually long stretch of archaic DNA — both signs that natural selection had boosted its prevalence. The research also revealed that the gene was likely passed through interbreeding from Denisovans to another archaic population, the Neanderthals, who then interbred with modern humans.
Huerta-Sánchez said the findings demonstrate the importance that interbreeding had in introducing new and potentially useful genetic variation in the human lineage.
Typically, genetic novelty is generated through a very slow process, but these interbreeding events were a sudden way to introduce a lot of new variation.
Professor Emilia Huerta-Sánchez.
In this case, she said, that “new reservoir of genetic variation” appears to have helped modern humans as they migrated into the Americas, perhaps providing a boost to the immune system.
Something about this gene was clearly useful for these populations — and maybe still is or will be in the future.
Professor Emilia Huerta-Sánchez.
She’s hopeful that the recognition of the gene’s importance will spur new research into its function to reveal novel biological mechanisms, especially since it involves coding genetic variants that alter the protein sequence.
Huerta-Sánchez co-authored the study with Fernando Villanea, a former postdoctoral researcher at Brown who is now at University of Colorado, Boulder; David Peede, a graduate student at Brown; and an international team of collaborators.
INTRODUCTION
Modern human genomes contain a small number of archaic variants, the legacy of past interbreeding events with Neanderthals and Denisovans. Most of these variants are putatively neutral, but some archaic variants found in modern humans have been targets of positive natural selection and may have been pivotal for adapting to new environments as humans populated the world. American populations encountered a myriad of novel environments, providing the opportunity for natural selection to favor archaic variants in these new environmental contexts. Indigenous and admixed American populations have been understudied in this regard but present great potential for studying the underlying evolutionary processes of local adaptation.
RATIONALE
Previous studies identified the gene MUC19—which codes for a mucin involved in immunity—as a candidate for introgression from Denisovans as well as a candidate for positive natural selection in present-day Indigenous and admixed American populations. Therefore, we sought to confirm and further characterize signatures of both archaic introgression and positive selection at MUC19, with particular interest in modern and ancient American populations.
RESULTS
We identify an archaic haplotype segregating at high frequency in most admixed American populations, and among ancient genomes from 23 ancient Indigenous American individuals who predate admixture with Europeans and Africans. We conclude that the archaic haplotype has undergone positive natural selection in these populations, which is tied to their Indigenous components of ancestry. We also find that modern admixed American individuals exhibit an elevated number of variable number tandem repeats (VNTRs) at MUC19, which codes for the functional domain of the MUC19 protein, where it binds to oligosaccharides to form a glycoprotein, a characteristic of the mucins. Remarkably, we find an association between the number of VNTRs and the number of introgressed haplotypes; individuals harboring introgressed haplotypes tend to have a higher number of VNTRs. In addition to the differences in VNTRs, we find that the archaic MUC19 haplotype contains nine Denisovan-specific, nonsynonymous variants found at high frequencies in American populations. Finally, we observed that the Denisovan-specific variants are contained in a 72-kb region of the MUC19 gene, but that region is embedded in a larger 742-kb region that contains Neanderthal-specific variants. When we studied MUC19 in three high-coverage Neanderthal individuals, we found that the Chagyrskaya and Vindija Neanderthals carry the Denisovan-like haplotype in its heterozygous form. These two Neanderthals also carry another haplotype that is shared with the Altai Neanderthals.
CONCLUSION
Our study identifies several aspects of the gene MUC19 that highlight its importance for studying adaptive introgression: One of the haplotypes that span this gene in modern humans is of archaic origin, and modern humans inherited this haplotype from Neanderthals who likely inherited it from Denisovans. Then, as modern human populations expanded into the Americas, our results suggest that they experienced a massive coding VNTR expansion, which occurred on an archaic haplotype background in MUC19. The functional impact of the variation at this gene may help explain how mainland Indigenous Americans adapted to their environments, which remains underexplored. Our results point to a complex pattern of multiple introgression events, from Denisovans to Neanderthals and Neanderthals to modern humans, which may have later played a distinct role in the evolutionary history of Indigenous American populations.
The proposed evolutionary history of MUC19.
The Denisovan-like haplotype (in orange) was first introgressed from Denisovans into Neanderthals and then introgressed into modern humans. The introgressed haplotype later experienced positive selection in populations from the Americas. The introgressed MUC19 haplotype is composed of a 742-kb region that contains Neanderthal-specific variants (blue). Embedded within this Neanderthal-like region is a 72-kb region containing a high density of Denisovan-specific variants (orange), and an exonic variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) region (gray). The box below the 742-kb region depicts zooming into the MUC19 VNTR region, in which admixed American individuals carry an elevated number of tandem repeat copies.
Abstract
We study the gene MUC19, for which some modern humans carry a Denisovan-like haplotype. MUC19 is a mucin, a glycoprotein that forms gels with various biological functions. We find diagnostic variants for the Denisovan-like MUC19 haplotype at high frequencies in admixed American individuals and at highest frequency in 23 ancient Indigenous American individuals, all pre-dating population admixture with Europeans and Africans. We find that the Denisovan-like MUC19 haplotype is under positive selection and carries a higher copy number of a 30–base-pair variable number tandem repeat, and that copy numbers of this repeat are exceedingly high in admixed American populations. Finally, we find that some Neanderthals carry the Denisovan-like MUC19 haplotype, and that it was likely introgressed into modern human populations through Neanderthal introgression rather than Denisovan introgression.
So here we have it yet again: a gene that entered the human lineage not by divine fiat, but by the messy, natural processes of interbreeding, survival, and selection. It is hard to imagine a clearer demonstration of how evolution operates in practice — reshaping our genomes, blending lineages, and preserving whatever works in the long struggle against disease and death.
For creationists, this isn’t just inconvenient; it’s catastrophic. Their worldview depends on a myth of humans created fully formed, apart from and above the rest of nature, a few thousand years ago. But the evidence of MUC19 is another reminder that we are not passengers on a separate track. We are part of the same evolutionary story as Neanderthals, Denisovans, and the countless other hominins who walked the Earth before us.
Science doesn’t just explain our origins better than Genesis — it explains them *at all*. The biblical account collapses under the weight of real data, while evolution continues to weave a coherent, testable, and beautifully messy picture of our past. Each discovery like this adds another nail in the coffin of creationism and another stone in the foundation of our true evolutionary heritage.
The Bible’s story may comfort creationists and make them feel important, but the genome tells the truth.
A new study in Frontiers in Ecology & Evolution delivers a striking confirmation of evolutionary theory while dealing another blow to creationist claims. Researchers John J. Wiens (University of Arizona) and Daniel S. Moen (University of California, Riverside) show that the vast majority of Earth’s species richness stems from a handful of lineages that underwent explosive bursts of diversification — precisely what evolutionary theory predicts.
Analysing enormous datasets covering more than 2 million described species across multiple taxonomic levels, the team found that "over 80% of all known biodiversity is packed into the clades with the fastest diversification rates". This pattern holds true for animals, plants, insects, vertebrates, and even across kingdoms, showing that biodiversity is not spread evenly but arises overwhelmingly from rapid radiations and occurs at all taxonomic levels.
The message is clear: most of life’s diversity comes from bursts of speciation linked to ecological opportunity and innovation, not from slow, uniform accumulation over time. The results reveal a universal pattern across the tree of life, confirming that natural selection acting on changing environments and new niches drives the extraordinary richness we see today.
For creationists, this is more bad news. Their model of static “kinds” appearing fully formed cannot explain why biodiversity clusters so strongly in rapidly radiating groups, or why it forms the nested hierarchies that evolution predicts. The evidence instead shows life as a continuous, dynamic process of descent with modification from common ancestors—exactly as Darwin envisaged, and the exact opposite of “special creation.”
Another day, another paper refuting creationism and the Bible narrative.
Creationism suffered yet another body blow a few days ago with the announcement that a Tel Aviv University (TAU)-led international team has concluded that 140,000-year-old fossilised remains of a child, found 90 years ago in the Skhūl Cave on Mount Carmel, show unmistakable evidence of being a hybrid between a modern Homo sapiens and a Neanderthal.
Whether this news will penetrate the impervious defences of creationists — who resemble a brain-dead boxer long since counted out, the crowd gone home, yet still convinced he is winning — remains to be seen.
Not only does this timeline, which places anatomically modern humans outside Africa living alongside another hominin species, utterly contradict the Bible’s creation myth, but so does the very fact that there were multiple hominin species at all. The problem for Bible literalists is not just the incompatibility of dates, but the clear evidence of human evolution and divergence — evidence that rules out the notion of a single ancestral couple committing an “original sin” that supposedly condemns all their descendants to seek “salvation” from the wrath of an eternally unforgiving creator god.
To make matters worse for creationism, this fossil was found in the very region that later became central to the Bronze Age mythology of the Bible.
From a scientific perspective, this discovery — confirming what has long been suspected — shows that there were several earlier, ultimately unsuccessful migrations of H. sapiens out of Africa. During these early dispersals, modern humans met and interbred with Neanderthals, introducing *H. sapiens
DNA into Neanderthal populations long before the successful migration around 60,000–40,000 years ago, when further interbreeding occurred.
Being largely ignorant of any wildlife beyond what could be reached within a day or two’s walk of their pastures — and entirely ignorant of anything invisible to the naked eye — the Bible’s authors consistently imply that all living animals exist only as male or female, and that sexual reproduction is the sole reproductive strategy:
And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Genesis 1:26–27
And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female.
Genesis 6:19–20
Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female. Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the male and the female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth.
Genesis 7:2–3
With their parochial worldview, the Bible’s authors had no knowledge of distant continents such as Australia—indeed, they show no awareness of Northern Europe or of Asia beyond their own region, let alone of a spherical Earth divided into two hemispheres. This limitation could not be levelled against an all-knowing creator god, of course—which is precisely how we know no such god was involved in its writing. Had one been, we might reasonably expect the text to reflect a broader knowledge of the world and its history, and a more accurate understanding of living things, their origins, and their reproductive strategies—including those invisible to the unaided eye. Instead, we encounter a world that conforms only to the narrow perceptions and superstitions of its authors.
The Australian central bearded dragon Pogona vitticeps.
The Australian central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) is one of the best-studied reptiles, both in ecology and genetics, because it is hardy, widespread, and unusually flexible in its sex determination. Here’s a structured overview:
Taxonomy & Distribution
Scientific name:Pogona vitticeps (Ahl, 1926)
Family: Agamidae (dragon lizards)
Common name: Central bearded dragon
Range: Arid and semi-arid regions of central Australia, mainly New South Wales, Northern Territory, South Australia, and Queensland.
Habitat: Desert, scrubland, dry forests, and savannahs. They prefer open woodlands with scattered bushes, often basking on branches, rocks, or fence posts.
Morphology & Behaviour
Size: Adults typically 40–60 cm (including tail); males tend to be larger than females.
Distinctive feature: The “beard”—a throat pouch lined with spiny scales that can darken (turn black) and flare out in displays of aggression, courtship, or stress.
Colouration: Usually grey, tan, or reddish-brown, with banded patterns that aid camouflage.
Behaviour:
Diurnal (active by day).
Ectothermic, basking to thermoregulate.
Can change body colour slightly for temperature control.
Known for their arm-waving display, thought to be a submissive or social signal.
Diet: Omnivorous. Eats insects, small vertebrates, and vegetation (flowers, leaves, fruit).
Reproduction & Sex Determination
Reproduction: Oviparous; females lay clutches of 11–30 eggs, often burying them in sand.
Sex determination:
Pogona vitticeps has ZZ/ZW sex chromosomes (ZZ = male, ZW = female), similar to birds.
However, high incubation temperatures can override chromosomal sex determination, producing phenotypic females from ZZ embryos.
Remarkably, these sex-reversed females are fertile and can breed successfully.
This makes the species a model for studying the interaction between genetic and environmental sex determination.
Ecological & Evolutionary Significance
P. vitticeps is one of the clearest examples of temperature-dependent sex reversal in reptiles, showing how climate change could disrupt population dynamics.
Sex-reversed ZZ females often have higher fertility than ZW females, raising evolutionary questions about the persistence of sex chromosomes in the species.
Provides a natural system for studying transitions between sex-determining mechanisms in vertebrates.
Research Importance
The genome of P. vitticeps has been sequenced and annotated:
George et al. (2015): First high-coverage genome assembly (GigaScience).
Patel et al. (2023): Near telomere-to-telomere phased assembly, greatly improving resolution of its sex chromosomes.
Used widely in laboratories and classrooms as a model organism for genetics, endocrinology, ecology, and climate change biology.
Human Interaction
Very popular in the pet trade due to docile temperament, ease of handling, and tolerance of captivity.
Lifespan: ~8–12 years in captivity, shorter in the wild.
Threats in the wild: habitat modification and predation, but not considered endangered.
What happens what a ZZ female mates with a normal (ZZ) male?
First, let’s recall the genetics:
In P. vitticeps, ZZ = male, ZW = female (like birds).
A sex-reversed female is genetically ZZ, but develops as a female because high incubation temperatures override the chromosomal system.
Now, what happens if a ZZ sex-reversed female mates with a normal ZZ male?
The offspring will inherit one Z from each parent.
Therefore, all offspring will be ZZ.
Genetically, that means all would be male under normal incubation temperatures.
However:
If the eggs are incubated at high temperatures, some of those ZZ embryos will again develop as phenotypic females (sex-reversed).
So the sex ratio of the clutch depends not on the chromosomes (which are all ZZ) but on the environmental conditions during incubation.
In short: the cross between a ZZ female and a ZZ male yields 100% ZZ offspring. Their actual gender (male or female) depends on incubation temperature, not genetics alone.
Modern biology, by contrast, reveals a far richer diversity. Many species are hermaphroditic or parthenogenetic, bypassing the binary of male and female. In plants, hermaphroditism and dioecy are both common: some flowers are self-fertile, while others produce male and female flowers on the same plant. In the animal kingdom too, there are remarkable exceptions to the biblical binary.
One such case is the central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps), a reptile capable of sex reversal under certain environmental conditions—much like some fish and a handful of amphibians. That alone challenges the biblical notion of “male and female created he them”: these lizards were “created” with the genetic capacity to change sex after birth.
How this process works has now been elucidated by two teams of researchers—one from BGI, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Zhejiang University, and another from the University of Canberra.
Double Dragon Genomes Helping Explain Sex Determination of ReptilesTwo almost complete and gapless genomes of the sex-changing central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) are published back-to-back to help tackle the mystery of reptile sex determination. Alongside a new gapless rice genome showcasing new CycloneSeq nanopore sequencing technologies ability to complete animal and plant genomes.Two Genomes are Better Than One for Studying Reptile Sex
Today marks the publication of two different groups papers presenting the near-complete reference genomes of the central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps), a widely distributed species of dragon lizard common in central eastern Australia and popular as pets in Europe, Asia, and North America. This species has an unusual trait for an animal species: whether this lizard grows up to be a male or a female depends not only on genetics but also on the temperature of its nest. This has long made it a useful model to study the biological basis of sex determination, and the advent of huge technological improvements in genomics has finally found a region of the genome and a potential master sex determination gene likely central to male sexual differentiation. The independent verification of this by two different groups using two different approaches making this a much stronger finding.
Bearded dragons have an unusual sex determination system which is influenced by both genetics and environmental factors, specifically temperature. Unlike most animals where sex is solely determined by chromosomes, bearded dragons can have their sex reversed from male to female by high incubation temperatures. Meaning a lizard with male chromosomes can develop into a reproductively functional female if the egg is incubated at a warm enough temperature.
Like birds and many reptiles, this species has a ZZ/ZW sex chromosome system where females have a pair of dissimilar ZW chromosomes, and males have two similar ZZ chromosomes. Sex determination in this species is complicated further, as ZZ genotypic males can change to phenotypic females at high incubation temperatures without the help of W chromosome or W-linked genes. New ultra-long nanopore sequencing technology now allows us to generate telomere-to-telomere (T2T) assemblies of the sex chromosomes and identify the non-recombining regions to help narrow the field of candidate sex determining genes in species with chromosomal sex determination. The ability of this technology to better separate out the maternal and paternal halves of the genome now allows much easier comparisons of the Z and W sequences to gauge potential loss or difference in function of key sex gene candidates.
Here Be Dragons
The first paper from researchers from BGI, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Zhejiang University, uses DNBSEQ short-reads combined with long-reads from the new CycloneSEQ nanopore sequencer, this being the first animal genome published using this technology. Generation of the second genome was led by researchers from the University of Canberra with funding from Bioplatforms Australia, the Australian Research Council and PacBio Singapore, and with contributions to analyses from researchers of the Australian National University, Garvan Institute for Medical Research, University of New South Wales and CSIRO alongside Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) in Spain. This assembly uses PacBio HiFi, ONT ultralong reads and Hi-C sequencing. Having reference genomes published using these two different technologies allows a like-for-like comparison between the ONT and CycloneSEQ technologies for the first time. Both technologies also complement each other by investigating the sex determination question using different approaches. The first genome sequenced a ZZ male central bearded dragon to characterize the whole Z sex chromosome for the first time while the second assembled the genome of a female ZW individual. The new nanopore sequencer also enabled therecovery of around 124 million base pairs of previously undescribed and missing sequences (nearly 7% of the genome), which included numerous genes and regulatory elements to better elucidate the complicated sex determination system.
Both projects assembled 1.75 Gbp genome assemblies of exceptionally high quality to assemble all but one of the telomeres, and only a few gaps remained mostly located in the microchromosomes. Using this data showed the Z and W specific sex chromosomes were assembled into single scaffolds, and a “pseudo-autosomal region” (PAR) where the sex chromosomes pair and recombine was also detected on chromosome 16. The sequencing of the male dragon by the BGI team looked for genes specific to Z but not the W chromosomes, and Amh and Amhr2 (the Anti-Müllerian hormone gene and its receptor) plus Bmpr1a were determined as strong candidates for the sex determining genes in this species. The sequencing of the female dragon by the Australian-led team pinpointed to the same candidate Sex Determination Region (SDR) of their dragon genome, and also highlighted Amh and Amhr2 as the likely candidate genes. Studying the expression in different developmental stages found Amh had significant male-biased expression patterns making it the most likely candidate as the master sex-determining gene. The differential expression of another sex-related gene Nr5a1 in the PAR suggests that the story may be more complicated, as Nr5a1 encodes a transcription factor with binding sites on the Amh promoter region. Unlike many fish that enlist Amh-like genes in sex determination, the autosomal copies of Amh and its receptor gene Amhr2 remain intact and functional. It could be that sex is determined by some form of caucus among genes on the sex chromosomes of the bearded dragon moderated by their residual autosomal copies.
The main highlight of these assemblies is therefore the discovery of genetic elements central to male sexual differentiation in vertebrates, on the sex chromosomes. The genes Amh and that coding its receptor AMHR2 have been copied to the Z chromosome in the non-recombining region, and so are obvious candidates for the master sex determining gene working via a dosage-based mechanism in this species, a discovery that has eluded discovery for so many years. No master sex determining gene akin to Sry in mammals or Dmrt1 in birds has to date been discovered in any reptile species. This new work provides a clear candidate in Amh, which is present in double dose in the ZZ male and single dose in the ZW female.
Arthur Georges from University of Canberra and senior author on the second paper says on the utility of this work:
We anticipate accelerated research in other areas arising from these newly available assemblies, such as cranial development, brain development, behavioural studies, gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in comparative studies of vertebrate sex determination and in many other areas looking for a well-supported squamate model against which to compare with their model species be it mouse, human or bird. I never cease to be amazed by the rapidity of progress of Chinese science. In relatively few years, BGI and its companion enterprises have developed sequencing technologies that deliver outcomes as good, and throughput and cost effectiveness that is better, than competing technologies on the market. These genome assemblies are testimony to that level of achievement.
Arthur Georges, lead author of the 2015 paper.
Institute for Applied Ecology
University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
CycloneSeq Storms the Year of the Dragon
Qiye Li from BGI Research and senior author on the first paper of the Chinese project explains their rationale for using this approach:
We decided to start working on the bearded dragon genome last year as the first animal genome for this new sequencer because it was the Year of the Dragon in China. Benefiting from the unbiased long-reads provided by the CycloneSEQ sequencer, we readily obtained a highly contiguous genome assembly and resolved highly repetitive and high-GC regions that were traditionally challenging for assembly. The two reference genomes, derived from opposite sex and generated by different technologies, are indeed complementary to each other. I am excited that both genomes pinpoint the key role of AMH signaling in sex determination in this species. But how did the sex chromosomes arise? We anticipate that additional high‑quality genomes from related species will further elucidate the evolutionary origin of the ZW system and complete the story
Qiye Li, senior author of the 2015 paper
China National GeneBank
BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
It is nice to have Qiye publish with us again, as on top of the first generation bearded genome he published the Eastern banjo frog genome in the launch papers of GigaByte, and also recorded a video abstract in GigaTV.
Having two separate projects finding the same key candidate master genes independently of each other greatly increases the confidence in these findings. And openly sharing all of the data allows others to build upon this work, especially as the exact role of some of the other contributing transcription factors linked to sex determination are not yet fully resolved. The generation of these two new high quality genome assemblies however, is a massive step forward towards understanding the complete story of sex determination in this species.
Also published today by the same group at BGI is the Telome-to-Telomere assembly of the is perennial wild rice Oryza longistaminata. This follows our recent microbial genome benchmarking paper in GigaByte, taking this a step further by showing the same CycloneSEQ genome technology coupled with PacBio HiFi and Hi-C data can handle plant genomes. And is also the first time a T2T assembly has been published using this new technology, making it suitable for the strict criteria of our T2T series and demonstrating the successful validation of CycloneSEQ across diverse branches of the tree of life.
A Cassyni webinar with the two lead authors is organized for 26th August at 00:00 UTC and provides an opportunity to ask them questions on this work. Sign up here to watch and post questions https://cassyni.com/events/SWHReTL1j8YPEvxnLsyKYq
References:
Guo Q, Pan Y, Dai W et al., A near-complete genome assembly of the bearded dragon Pogona vitticeps provides insights into the origin of Pogona sex chromosomes. GigaScience 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaf079
Patel HR, Alreja K, Reis AML, et al., A near telomere to telomere phased genome assembly and annotation for the Australian central bearded dragon Pogona vitticeps. GigaScience 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaf085
Georges A, Li Q, Lian J, et al., High-coverage sequencing and annotated assembly of the genome of the Australian dragon lizard Pogona vitticeps. GigaScience. 2015 Sep 28;4:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13742-015-0085-2
Guang X, Yang J, Zhang, S, et al., Telomere-to-telomere African wild rice (Oryza longistaminata) reference genome reveals segmental and structural variation.GigaScience 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaf074
Liang H, Zou Y, Wang M, et al., Efficiently constructing complete genomes with CycloneSEQ to fill gaps in bacterial draft assemblies. GigaByte. 2025 Apr 25;2025:gigabyte154. https://doi.org/10.46471/gigabyte.154
Li Q, Guo Q, Zhou Y, et al., A draft genome assembly of the eastern banjo frog Limnodynastes dumerilii dumerilii (Anura: Limnodynastidae). GigaByte. 2020 Jul 1;2020:gigabyte2. https://doi.org/10.46471/gigabyte.2
Abstract
Background
Vertebrate sex is typically determined either by genetic factors, such as sex chromosomes, or by environmental cues like temperature. Therefore, the agamid dragon lizard Pogona vitticeps is remarkable in this regard, as it exhibits both ZZ/ZW genetic and temperature-dependent sex determination. However, complete sequence and full gene content of P. vitticeps sex chromosomes remain unclear, hindering the investigation of sex-determining cascade in this model lizard.
Results
Using CycloneSEQ and DNBSEQ sequencing technologies, we generated a near-complete chromosome-scale genome assembly for a ZZ male P. vitticeps. Compared with previous reference genome (GCF_900067755.1/Pvi1.1), this ∼1.8-Gb new assembly displayed >5,700-fold improvement in contiguity (contig N50: 202.5 Mb vs. 35.5 kb) and achieved complete chromosome anchoring (16 vs. 13,749 scaffolds). We found that over 80% of the P. vitticeps Z chromosome remains as a pseudo-autosomal region, where recombination is not suppressed. The sexually differentiated region (SDR) is small and occupied mostly by transposons, yet it aggregates genes involved in male development, such as AMH, AMHR2, and BMPR1A. Finally, by tracking the evolutionary origin and developmental expression of SDR genes, we proposed a model for the origin of P. vitticeps sex chromosomes that considered the Z-linked AMH as the master sex-determining gene.
Conclusions
In this study, we fully characterized the Z sex chromosome of P. vitticeps, identified AMH as the candidate sex-determining gene, and proposed a new model for the origin of P. vitticeps sex chromosomes. The near-complete P. vitticeps reference genome will also benefit future study of reptile evolution.
Introduction
Sex determination is a fundamental process in sexual organisms, influencing reproductive strategies, population dynamics, and genetic diversity [1]. Among vertebrates, the mechanisms of sex determination are diverse, ranging from genetic sex determination (GSD) to those determined by environmental factors such as temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) [2–5]. The central bearded dragon Pogona vitticeps (NCBI:txid103695) represents a fantastic model in studying the molecular cascades of sex determination, as this species possesses a unique ZZ/ZW GSD system that is influenced by temperature. Normally, ZW embryos of P. vitticeps develop as females and ZZ embryos as males. However, high incubation temperatures can induce functional male-to-female sex reversal in genetically male (ZZ) individuals [6]. The capacity of a ZZ embryo to develop as a normal female without the help of the W chromosome suggests that sexual fate is most likely determined by a dosage-sensitive gene on the Z chromosome [7], making the complete Z chromosome sequence particularly crucial for deciphering the sex-determining cascade in this species.
While many studies involving P. vitticeps in the past decade tightly rely on its genome assembly and annotation, the current reference genome (GCF_900067755.1/Pvi1.1) is still quite fragmented. This reference genome was constructed with a wild-caught ZZ male individual, based on Illumina short-read sequencing data generated from gradient libraries with an insert size ranging from 250 bp to 40 kb [8]. Due to the limitation of short-read sequencing, the contig N50 of this assembly version is merely 35.5 kb in length, lagging far behind the common standard of a reference genome (>1 Mb), as proposed by the Earth BioGenome Project (EBP) [9] and the Vertebrate Genomes Project (VGP) [10] in recent years. Furthermore, telomeres, which are essential for chromosome stability and composed of thousands of telomeric repeat units (TRUs) (TTAGGG)n [11] in vertebrates, are almost absent in Pvi1.1 due to the limitation of short reads in assembling highly repetitive regions. Additionally, P. vitticeps possesses microchromosomes [12], which, like those in birds and some reptiles, present significant assembly challenges due to their high gene density, elevated GC content, and intense interchromosomal interaction signals [13]. These characteristics make the assembly of a complete P. vitticeps genome particularly challenging. Although subsequent scaffolding efforts anchored ∼42% of the genomic sequences to chromosomes [14], the low anchoring percentage still limits its use in chromosome-scale investigation. For example, the sex chromosomes of P. vitticeps are well known to be heteromorphic based on cytogenetic evidence, implying the existence of sequence divergence between Z and W due to recombination suppression [15]. However, the PAR and SDR of both sex chromosomes remain undefined so far, which in turn hamper the search for the master sex-determining gene.
In this study, we generated a chromosome-scale genome assembly for a ZZ male P. vitticeps, via a combination of long- and short-read whole-genome sequencing (WGS), as well as long-range sequencing technologies. With this near-complete genome assembly, we fully characterized the Z sex chromosome of P. vitticeps and demarcated the PAR and SDR on Z, tracked the evolutionary origin and developmental expression of the Z-linked SDR genes, and proposed an alternative model for explaining the origin of sex chromosomes with the Z-linked AMH as the candidate of master sex-determining gene in P. vitticeps.
Qunfei Guo, Youliang Pan, Wei Dai, Fei Guo, Tao Zeng, Wanyi Chen, Yaping Mi, Yanshu Zhang, Shuaizhen Shi, Wei Jiang, Huimin Cai, Beiying Wu, Yang Zhou, Ying Wang, Chentao Yang, Xiao Shi, Xu Yan, Junyi Chen, Chongyang Cai, Jingnan Yang, Xun Xu, Ying Gu, Yuliang Dong, Qiye Li, A near-complete genome assembly of the bearded dragon Pogona vitticeps provides insights into the origin of Pogona sex chromosome GigaScience, 14, 2025, giaf079, https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaf079
Background
The central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) is widely distributed in central eastern Australia and adapts readily to captivity. Among other attributes, it is distinctive because it undergoes sex reversal from ZZ genotypic males to phenotypic females at high incubation temperatures. Here, we report an annotated near telomere-to-telomere phased assembly of the genome of a female ZW central bearded dragon.
Results
Genome assembly length is 1.75 Gbp with a scaffold N50 of 266.2 Mbp, N90 of 28.1 Mbp, 26 gaps, and 42.2% GC content. Most (99.6%) of the reference assembly is scaffolded into 6 macrochromosomes and 10 microchromosomes, including the Z and W microchromosomes, corresponding to the karyotype. The genome assembly exceeds standard recommended by the Earth Biogenome Project (6CQ40): 0.003% collapsed sequence, 0.03% false expansions, 99.8% k-mer completeness, 97.9% complete single-copy BUSCO genes, and an average of 93.5% of transcriptome data mappable back to the genome assembly. The mitochondrial genome (16,731 bp) and the model ribosomal DNA repeat unit (length 9.5 Kbp) were assembled. Male vertebrate sex genes Amh and Amhr2 were discovered as copies in the small non-recombining region of the Z chromosome, absent from the W chromosome. This, coupled with the prior discovery of differential Z and W transcriptional isoform composition arising from pseudo-autosomal sex gene Nr5a1, suggests that complex interactions between these genes, their autosomal copies, and their resultant transcription factors and intermediaries determine sex in the bearded dragon.
Conclusion
This high-quality assembly will serve as a resource to enable and accelerate research into the unusual reproductive attributes of this species and for comparative studies across the Agamidae and reptiles more generally.
Graphical Abstract Assembly of a ZW female of the Central Bearded Dragon.
Introduction
The family Agamidae, commonly known as dragon lizards, is a diverse group of lizards found in Africa, Asia, Australia, the Western Pacific, and warmer regions of southern Europe. The Agamidae family is well represented in Australia, in part because of their successful radiation in response to the progressive aridification of the Australian continent during the Pleistocene. New species are continually being described, but on recent count, they comprise 81 species in 15 genera [1.1] that occupy a very wide array of habitats ranging from the inland deserts to the mesic habitats of the coast and the Australian Alps below the treeline. The family includes some iconic species, such as the thorny devil Moloch horridus and the frillneck lizard Chlamydosaurus kingii. Less spectacular perhaps is the central bearded dragon Pogona vitticeps, a widely distributed species of Amphibolurine dragon common in central eastern Australia (Fig. 1). The bearded dragon feeds on insects and other invertebrates, but a substantial component of the diet of adults is vegetable matter. It lives in the dry sclerophyll forests and woodlands in the southeast of its range, mallee and arid acacia scrublands further north and west, and the sandy deserts of the interior. Semi-arboreal, the species often perches on fallen timber and tree branches, only to retreat to ground cover when disturbed.
.
Figure 1: The central bearded dragon P. vitticeps and the distribution of the species based on records from Australian museums (via Atlas of Living Australia https://www.ala.org.au/).
Central bearded dragons adapt readily to captivity, lay large clutches of eggs several times per season, and are commonly kept as a pet in Europe, Asia, and North America. These attributes also increase its value as a popular reptile research model in a range of disciplines [2.1–7.1]. Central bearded dragons are a particularly compelling model species for sex determination because they display temperature-induced sex reversal in the laboratory and in the wild [8.1–10.1]. The sex chromosomes of central bearded dragons are poorly differentiated morphologically. They exhibit female heterogamety (ZZ/ZW sex chromosome system, [11.1]) with 6 macrochromosome pairs and 10 microchromosome pairs [12.1] that include the sex microchromosome pair [11.1]. Bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) sequences have been physically mapped uniquely to each of the chromosomes [13.1, 14.1].
Sex determination in this species is particularly subtle until now, with no substantial difference between the Z and W chromosome gene content or single-copy sequence [15.1]. The developmental program initiated by chromosomal sex determination can be reversed by high incubation temperature, allowing for investigations of environmental influences on fundamental developmental processes. Research in these areas of interest will be greatly facilitated by applying modern sequencing technologies to generate a high-quality draft genome assembly for the central bearded dragon. The ability to generate telomere-to-telomere (T2T) assemblies of the sex chromosomes and identify the non-recombining regions within which lies any master sex determining gene will greatly narrow the field of candidate sex-determining genes in species with chromosomal sex determination. Furthermore, the disaggregation of the Z and W sex chromosome haplotypes (phasing) will allow comparisons of the Z and W sequences to gauge putative loss or difference in function of key sex gene candidates.
In this article, we present a draft annotated near-T2T phased assembly of the genome of the Australian central bearded dragon as a resource to enable and accelerate research into the unusual reproductive attributes of this species and for comparative studies across the Agamidae and reptiles more generally. This is a vastly improved assembly in comparison with an earier assembly based on Illumina short-read technology published in 2015 [16.1].
For people who regard the Bible as an inerrant science textbook, the central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) presents a particular difficulty. Genesis repeatedly stresses that living creatures were created “male and female,” with sexual reproduction portrayed as the only mechanism by which animals continue their kind. This reflects the limited knowledge of Iron Age authors, who assumed that the reproductive patterns they observed in their herds and flocks applied universally.
The central bearded dragon, however, undermines that simplistic binary. Like birds, it has a genetic sex-determination system, with ZZ males and ZW females. But under high incubation temperatures, the genetic signal can be overridden: ZZ embryos that should have developed into males instead become fully functional females. These “sex-reversed” females are not only fertile but in some cases more fecund than ZW females. In other words, here is a species that can literally change sex, with environmental conditions reshaping the reproductive role of an individual regardless of its chromosomes.
Such a finding is entirely at odds with the biblical claim that animals exist strictly as “male and female.” If the text were a genuine revelation from an omniscient creator, we might expect at least some recognition that reproduction is more diverse and flexible than the binary categories known to ancient herdsmen. Instead, we find a narrow view that excludes hermaphroditism, parthenogenesis, and the extraordinary capacity for sex reversal found in reptiles, fish, and amphibians.
The existence of Pogona vitticeps and its temperature-dependent sex reversal is a reminder that the natural world is more complex than the Bible’s authors could have imagined. Far from being “male and female, created he them,” life has evolved a wide spectrum of reproductive strategies, demonstrating once again that scripture is a human product of its time rather than a reliable guide to biology.
Advertisement
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
All titles available in paperback, hardcover, ebook for Kindle and audio format.
Prices correct at time of publication. for current prices.