Rosa Rubicondior: Refuting Creationism - 300,000 Years Of Stone Technology In Africa - Over 2 Million Years Before 'Creation Week'

Fig. 1: Map of Turkana Basin with the Namorotukunan Archeological Site and timeline of currently known events in the Plio-Pleistocene.

a Geographical context of the Koobi Fora Formation (red stripes), the paleontological collection area 40 (green square), and the location of the site of Namorotukunan (black dot); [map produced Natural Earth and NOAAA ETOPO 202295]; b Stratigraphic context of the Koobi Fora Formation highlighting members and key volcanic ash marker levels, yellow bars refer to the age of archeological horizons (tephrostratigraphy after McDougall et al.⁹⁶); c A chronology of key Plio-Pleistocene hominins from the East African Rift System (EARS)^11,74,97,98 d A chronology and key localities associated with hominin lithic technology^3,6,12 (images of Nyayanga provided by E. Finestone; images of Lomekwi and BD1 based on 3D models; artifact images are for representation and not to scale) and the investigations at Namorotukunan: red arrows represent the artifact levels in the archeological excavations (photos DRB), and colored circles (lettered A-G) represent geologic sections investigated to develop a synthetic stratigraphic column (presented in Figs. 2 and 3).

Braun, D.R., Palcu Rolier, D.V., Advokaat, E.L. et al (2025)

Stone Tools Through Generations: 300,000 Years of Human Technology | Media Relations | The George Washington University

The story of our origins is written in the ground of Africa. It is real, tangible, and objective — a record that doesn’t rely on belief or interpretation, but on physical evidence left behind by our ancient ancestors. A fresh chapter of that record has just been described in a new open-access paper in Nature Communications, authored by an international team of palaeoanthropologists led by Professor David R. Braun of the Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology at George Washington University, and the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany.

By comparison, the origins narrative found in Genesis reflects the worldview and assumptions of people who believed the Earth was small, flat, and covered by a solid dome. It is astonishing that, even today, some treat that ancient cosmology as a more reliable account of human history than the rich and expanding fossil and archaeological record in Africa. Yet such individuals continue to seek influence over policy, law, morality, and social institutions, grounding their authority not in evidence, but in pre-scientific tradition — a worldview formed long before the wheel, let alone modern science.

Turkana Basin (Kenya & Ethiopia).

A remote lake with a rich history

NASA Earth Obsrvarory

Geological and palaeoanthropological context

The Turkana Basin is a large endorheic drainage basin (i.e., one without outflow to the sea) centred on Lake Turkana in north-western Kenya and parts of southern Ethiopia. [1.1]
Because of rifting associated with the East African Rift, subsidence and deposition of sediments have been exceptionally steady in places, yielding a long, well-dated stratigraphic record spanning the Plio-Pleistocene (and beyond) in the Basin. [2.1]
This regular sedimentation, combined with volcanic ash layers for dating, makes the Basin- especially sites like the Koobi Fora region on the eastern shore of Lake Turkana — one of the richest and best understood areas for human-ancestor fossils and archaeological remains. [3.1]

Importance for human evolution

The Basin preserves early hominin fossils, including species of the genus Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis and others, making it a cornerstone of our understanding of human evolution. [3.1]
In particular, the Basin provides insights into how environmental change — increasingly arid conditions, shifting landscapes, rifting, volcanism — may have influenced hominin adaptation, behaviour and technology. [2.1]

Environmental backdrop

Over the Pliocene and Pleistocene, the landscape of the Basin shifted from wetter floodplain and lake-margin settings to more arid, open habitats, with concomitant changes in fauna (including herbivores) and vegetation (rise of C4 grasses). [1.1]
These shifts mean that hominins in the Turkana Basin were likely under varying ecological pressures (resources, mobility, competition, climate) that may have driven technological innovation (such as tool-making) and behavioural flexibility.

Namorotukunan (Kenya – Turkana Basin)

They look like simple stones, but they were state of the art tools millions of years ago, made with great skill and precison.

source: BBC

Site description & discovery

Namorotukunan is a newly reported archaeological site located in the north-eastern portion of the Turkana Basin, Kenya (Marsabit District), within the stratigraphic sequence of the Koobi Fora Formation — specifically the upper Tulu Bor and lower Burgi members. [4.1]
The significance: the site preserves three discrete archaeological horizons of stone-tool manufacture dated approximately 2.75 million years ago through to 2.44 million years ago. That gives a continuous span of around 300,000 years of technology at that location. [5.1]

Key findings

The archaeologists found multiple layers of stone-tool remains that show continuity of manufacture — i.e., hominins returned or remained in the same region and used stone technology over this long interval. [6.1]
The tools are part of the early Oldowan tradition (simple flakes, cores, percussive implements) and crucially suggest technological stability over hundreds of thousands of years, as well as an ability to adapt to the changing environment recorded in the sediments. [4.1]
Environmental context: layers show differing habitats — floodplain/wet to more arid riverine settings — so the tool-makers were coping with shifting landscapes and ecological regimes. [7.1]

Why this matters

It demonstrates that early hominins were not innovating in a single moment and then disappearing, but maintained manufacturing traditions and responded to long-term environmental variation.
For your book or blog purposes, Namorotukunan serves as a strong example of the tangible, objective record of human prehistory — reinforcing your argument about the sufficiency of the African ground-record versus mythology or belief-based narratives.
It pushes back the timeline for sustained stone-tool manufacture in a well-dated stratigraphic context, which has implications for how we think about the cognitive, social and ecological capacities of early hominins.

The latest research, also summarised in a press release from George Washington University, reveals that humans produced stone tools continuously at a site called Namorotukunan in Kenya’s Turkana Basin for around 300,000 years, from roughly 2.75 to 2.44 million years ago. This span is not only vastly longer than the brief timeline imagined in Genesis — it demonstrates deep technological continuity long before our species evolved. The technology is something our immediate Homo ancestors didn't regard as sacrosanct and the authorative word of remote ancestors, but built on and devoloped, laying the foundations of scientific discovery and technological innovation.

Stone Tools Through Generations: 300,000 Years of Human Technology
New research shows a 300,000-year presence of toolmaking and butchering along an ancient river in the Turkana Basin.
Imagine early humans meticulously crafting stone tools for nearly 300,000 years, all while contending with recurring wildfires, droughts, and dramatic environmental shifts. Now, a new study published in Nature Communications brings to light remarkable evidence of enduring technological tradition from Kenya’s Turkana Basin.

At an archaeological site called Namorotukunan, an international research team has uncovered one of the oldest and longest intervals of Oldowan stone tools yet discovered, dating from approximately 2.75 to 2.44 million years ago. These artifacts demonstrate that our ancestors not only survived but thrived throughout an environmentally volatile period in Earth’s history when Namorotukunan and the surrounding area transformed from a lush, fertile floodplain into a dry, arid environment.

This site reveals an extraordinary story of behavioral flexibility and cultural continuity. What we’re seeing isn’t a one-off innovation–it’s a long-standing technological tradition.

PDavid R. Braun, lead author Technological Primates Research Group
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Leipzig, Germany
And Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology
George Washington University
Washington, DC, USA.

Key Findings:

Tech Mastery Over of Millennia: Early hominins engineered sharp-edged stone tools with extraordinary consistency, showing advanced skill and knowledge passed down across countless generations—a steady legacy.
Thriving in the Face of Climate Chaos: These toolmakers lived through radical environmental upheavals. Their adaptable technology helped unlock new diets, including meat and marrow, turning hardship into a survival advantage.
Cutting-Edge Science with Ancient Rocks: Using volcanic ash dating, magnetic signals frozen in ancient sediments, and microscopic plant remains, researchers pieced together an epic climatic saga that provides context for this flourishing technology.
The 2.75 million year old Namorotukunan site reveals the earliest known evidence of tool making, showing that early humans adapted their technology through dramatic environmental shifts. According to the researchers, this discovery opens the door to further research on the connection between climate change and human innovation.

Namorotukunan offers a rare geological lens into a changing world long gone—where shifting rivers, wildfires, and aridification reshaped the landscape over and over. Yet despite these environmental challenges, early human ancestors were able to survive using their tool-making tradition, perhaps revealing the roots of one of humankind’s oldest habits: using technology to steady ourselves against change.

Dan V. Palcu Rolier, co-corresponding author
Fort Hoofddijk Paleomagnetic Lab
Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University
Utrecht, Netherlands. And Department of Geological Oceanography
Oceanographic Institute
University of São Paulo
São Paulo, Brazil.

Publication:
Braun, D.R., Palcu Rolier, D.V., Advokaat, E.L. et al.
Early Oldowan technology thrived during Pliocene environmental change in the Turkana Basin, Kenya.
Nat Commun 16, 9401 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64244-x

Abstract
Approximately 2.75 million years ago, the Turkana Basin in Kenya experienced environmental changes, including increased aridity and environmental variability. Namorotukunan is a newly discovered archaeological site which provides a window into hominin behavioral adaptations. This site lies within the upper Tulu Bor and lower Burgi members of the Koobi Fora Formation (Marsabit District, Kenya), presently a poorly understood time interval due to large-scale erosional events. Moreover, this locale represents the earliest known evidence of Oldowan technology within the Koobi Fora Formation. Oldowan sites, older than 2.6 million years ago, are rare, and these typically represent insights from narrow windows of time. In contrast, Namorotukunan provides evidence of tool-making behaviors spanning hundreds of thousands of years, offering a unique temporal perspective on technological stability. The site comprises three distinct archaeological horizons spanning approximately 300,000 years (2.75 − 2.44 Ma). Our findings suggest continuity in tool-making practices over time, with evidence of systematic selection of rock types. Geological descriptions and chronological data, provide robust age control and contextualize the archaeological finds. We employ multiple paleoenvironmental proxies, to reconstruct past ecological conditions. Our study highlights the interplay between environmental shifts and technological innovations, shedding light on pivotal factors in the trajectory of human evolution.

Introduction
The remarkable ability of humans to inhabit nearly every terrestrial ecosystem is a result of the synergy between biological and technological evolution¹. The long term significance of our evolutionary relationship with technology arises from the discovery of stone artifacts within Plio-Pleistocene sediments^2,3. This study provides new evidence from the Turkana Basin for the relationship between climatic and environmental shifts and the development of stone tool technologies by hominins. The earliest known assemblages of Oldowan artifacts ( ~ 2.9-2.6 Ma) are confined to four localities in eastern Africa^4,5 (Fig. 1). The earliest known localities provide insights into technological behaviors at single time horizons in the deep past. Despite advances in our understanding of early human technology, the specific mechanisms through which environmental changes influenced technological evolution in the earliest Oldowan remain poorly understood. Demonstrating how early hominins adapted their tool-making practices in response to changing environments would provide new insights into the evolutionary pressures that shaped these innovations. Here, we describe multiple assemblages of stone artifacts from well-constrained horizon, with age estimates at 2.75, 2.58, and 2.44 Ma, from the Koobi Fora Formation in the northeastern portion of the Turkana Basin (Paleontological Collection Area 40, archeological site Namorotukunan, National Museums of Kenya ID: FwJj 52). Detailed knowledge of environmental patterns within this region allows us to explore the interplay between periods of environmental change and the presence of an early Oldowan techno-complex that first evolved in the late Pliocene, and emphasizes temporal continuity throughout the Early Pleistocene, in eastern Africa.

The earliest phases of tool manufacture, dating back to over 3.0 million years ago⁶ (although see Archer⁷), highlight percussive technology, which is ubiquitous in hominin records and shared with other primates^8,9. Tool use, associated with extractive foraging, is a recurring trait in some extant primates¹⁰. The oldest systematic production of sharp-edged stone artifacts, known as the Oldowan, is found in the hominin behavioral record at eastern African sites: Ledi-Geraru and Gona in the Afar Basin (2.6 Ma), Ethiopia, and Nyayanga in western Kenya (2.6-2.9 Ma)^3,11,12,13.

In this study, we describe the earliest known Oldowan technologies and their paleoenvironmental context in the Koobi Fora Formation (Fig. 1). The presence of butchery marks on bones within the Namorotukunan assemblage underscores the role of sharp-edged tools in the foraging behavior of these hominins and suggests that the development of Oldowan technology was associated with the exploitation of resources mediated by tool use¹⁴. Open habitats such as savannas and grasslands expand at the end of the Pliocene and may have facilitated an adaptive shift in hominins towards a regular exploitation of foods requiring the use of tools (e.g., USOs, bone marrow, meat)^15,16. Here we examine three distinct temporal horizons containing evidence of sharp-edged tool technology spanning ~300,000 years. The consistent technological approaches across this interval suggest an enduring technological adaptation in the hominin lineage throughout the late Pliocene and earliest Pleistocene.

Braun, D.R., Palcu Rolier, D.V., Advokaat, E.L. et al.
Early Oldowan technology thrived during Pliocene environmental change in the Turkana Basin, Kenya.
Nat Commun 16, 9401 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64244-x

Copyright: © 2025 The authors.
Published by Springer Nature Ltd. Open access.
Reprinted under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0)

For creationists, findings like this are not merely inconvenient — they are fatal to their narrative. Every new discovery in Africa’s deep sediments adds yet another layer of evidence that humanity’s story stretches back millions of years, unfolding through natural processes, not divine intervention. The tools at Namorotukunan were being made and used by our distant ancestors long before the supposed date of Creation derived from biblical chronologies.

What we see preserved in that Kenyan soil is a lineage of skill and adaptation — generations refining the same methods, passing on knowledge, and surviving environmental change over hundreds of millennia. That reality cannot be reconciled with the notion of a young Earth or a single moment of human creation. It exposes those myths as the products of ancient ignorance, not insight.

And yet, despite the overwhelming weight of the evidence, creationists continue to deny the ground beneath their feet. They dismiss the objective record in favour of Bronze Age storytelling, because to admit the truth would mean admitting their claim to absolute authority and a privileged place in society as lawmakers and custodians of morality is bogus.

The Earth itself, however, has no allegiance — it simply preserves the facts. In Africa’s rocks and fossils, we find not only the proof of our deep ancestry but also the enduring failure of dogma to silence reality.

Advertisement

Amazon