The unemployable expelled seminarian has now taken to posting on G+ some faked 'screenshots' of Twitter tweets he claims are mine, even accusing me of what amounts to incitement to murder. Bear in mind that this sad little man has even faked emails purporting to come from Oxfam which in an unprecedented intervention on Twitter, Oxfam publically repudiated and confirmed Manny was lying.
You can see his infantile efforts here (if you're not blocked by +Sacerdotus that is - the coward is too afraid to let me see what lies he's telling about me):
See if you can spot the difference between a screenshot of a real tweet by me and one of Manny's fakes from his +SacerdotusSacerdotvs account:
That wasn't too hard now, was it? Yet Manuel thinks you're stupid enough not to see through his deception. I'm sure he's love to hear what you think of that...
It only takes a moment to see that unlike a genuine tweet, the @ name isn't showing under the apparent user name in Manny's fakes. He has obviously used one of his many fake Twitter accounts (probably @RosaRublcondior with which he used to post sexually explicit tweets until permanently suspended - note the lower-case 'L' in place of the 'i' after 'b') and has then removed the @ name to try to hide his deception). Did you notice the 'Labour Rose' on my avatar? I put that on before the UK general election in May 2010, and it's still there. Strange how Manny 'removed' it, eh?
Incidentally, this assumption that everyone is more stupid than he is is a characteristic of narcissistic personality disorder. Just think, he could have been a Catholic priest if he hadn't been caught in time - and apparently through his own arrogant carelessness!
As an amusing aside, when Manuel was feeling at his most humiliated by his own unavoidable public cowardice and trying everything he could think of to stop me telling people about him, he used this fake @RosaRublcondior Twitter account to post these sorts of tweets then used them to try to get a petition going to get me banned. He got three signatures - two of his own, and mine (I felt so sorry for him after all his pathetic efforts had come to nothing).
The question is not why Manuel is doing this - his bizarre, psychotic obsession with me since I humiliated him by challenging his to a formal debate from which he panicked and ran, and then ran some more, has been well documented - but how much longer are the people who run Google+ going to tolerate this abuse of their service to continue? Manny has already had one of his Wordpress blogs shut down for abuse, yet Google+ and Blogger appear to allow almost unlimited abuse including obviously forged 'evidence' of alleged criminal activities.
Special thanks to The Blind Wolf - Fabricated Twitter lies for the heads up on this and for permission to use the screenshots. This blogger should be followed for more exposure of Manny's dishonesty. He also posts on Twitter as @Ellif_DWulfe (Ellif D'Wulf).
[Update 22 August 2015] 'The Blind Wolf' has discovered an interesting fact about how Twitter handles urls with a tweet reference number attached, which shows conclusively that these tweets weren't mine but were almost certainly posted by Manuel de Dios Agosto using his fake @RosaRublcondior account.
First of all, try this link: https://twitter.com/Ellif_DWulfe/status/635025617256349697. You'll see all is perfectly straightforward. You can see the account and this tweet. [Update 1-Sep-2015] Sadly but understandably, Ellif has now protected his account following more good Christian threats by Manny against him, his family and his neighbours, so use the following random tweet instead https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/638649633120604160.
Now, try this reference to a tweet by a suspended account: https://twitter.com/CatholicGadfly/status/531558191306641408. You get the expected 'Account Suspended' screen. @CatholicGadfly is one of Manuel's known sock accounts.
Now, what happens if you use the tweet numeric reference plugged into the url of a normal account? https://twitter.com/Ellif_DWulfe/status/531558191306641408 (Manny's tweet from a suspended account plugged into Ellif_DWulfe's Twitter url). [Update 1-Sep-2015] Use this instead https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/531558191306641408
What's this? Account suspended? Surely not! Try the first link above again, just to be sure. Phew!
What happens is that Twitter give precedence to the reference number over the url. It looks for the tweet, finds the account is suspended and puts up the suspended screen there and then.
Recall that Manny used forged tweets with the following reference numbers left on, although he thoughtfully removed the @ name just in case:
Now, take Ellif's tweet reference and plug it into my @RosaRubicondior url (this is the account Manny wants you to believe tweeted his forged screenshots): https://twitter.com/RosaRubicondior/status/635025617256349697. Oh look! Again, the reference number takes precedence and Twitter redirects you to Ellif_DWulfe's tweet on his TL! [Update 1-Sep-2015] Use this instead: https://twitter.com/RosaRubicondior/status/638649633120604160
So what happens if we plug the reference numbers from Manny's forged screen shots into Ellif's Twitter url? https://twitter.com/Ellif_DWulfe/status/253302039675817985. Look at that! This tweet is protected, yet you can see all Ellif's other tweets! How can this be? [Update 1-Sep-2015] Use this one: https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/253302039675817985
Obviously, the account which tweeted that tweet isn't suspended, but the tweets are protected. No suspended screen and no redirects but you can't see the tweet.
Now, take that tweet reference and plug it into @RosaRubicondior's Twitter url e.g., https://twitter.com/RosaRubicondior/status/253302039675817985. Well,well! (That account is suspended! So, @RosaRubicondior did not post that tweet (it's on a protected account, not a suspended one).
Now, what happens if we plug the tweet reference into, say @RosaRubLcondior's url (i.e. another Manny sock account)? https://twitter.com/RosaRubLcondior/status/253302039675817985 Voilá! Guess who? Not me at all, but Manny in one of his many thin disguises! What a difference an 'L' makes!
Incidentally, note the date when that account was created. No doubt it's all a coincidence that Manny's forged screen shots are all based on tweets made shortly after that date. This of course doesn't absolutely prove the forged screenshots were from @RosaRubLcondior but the date is more than a little suspicious and we know that Manuel de Dios Agosto has doctored them for a reason. Not too difficult to join the dots, is it?
To quote 'The Blind Wolf':
So in summary: If the tweet ID number is from a suspended account we get redirected to the account suspended page, no matter what account name is in the URL
If the tweet ID number is from a protected account we get taken to the account that's named in the URL but get the message that we're unauthorised to see the status in question. If the account named is suspended we go to the suspension page instead.
So: The account that sent the images was the Parody account @RosarubLcondior an account attributed to Sacerdotus.
This means the tweets were likely sent as they are, but he scrubbed the @ name knowing it would give the deception away.
Source: Fabricated Twitter lies