Creationism in Crisis - Scientists Are Questioning Human Evolution - But Not In The Way Creationists Had Hoped

Ai-Generated Image (ChatGPT4o)

This article is best read on a laptop, desktop, or tablet

A new model upends the decades-old “hard steps” theory that intelligent life was an incredibly improbable event and suggests that maybe it wasn't all that hard or improbable. The team of researchers said the new interpretation of humanity’s origin increases the probability of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe.

Credit: NASA. All Rights Reserved.

Does planetary evolution favor human-like life? Study ups odds we’re not alone | Penn State University

An interdisciplinary team of astrophysicists and geoscientists has questioned the evolution of a human-like intelligent species. But the question is not about whether, as creationists have been predicting for 50 plus years, but just how easy or difficult was it? That we evolved was never in any doubt.

The relevance of the easy/difficult question is that it affects our calculation of the probability of similar intelligent life evolving on other planets. If each step in its evolution was hard (the 'hard step' model), then we may be alone in the Universe; if easy, then the Universe could be teeming with life.

Hard Sums For Creationists: How Mathematics is Used in Biology and is Failing to Prove Creationist Claims

A Dahlia bloom with petals arranged in a Fibonacci spiral.

Creationists love mathematics because they don't understand it. This makes them vulnerable to Creation Industry frauds who misuse statistics and probability theory to fool them into thinking mathematics can prove that life could not have arisen without the aid of magic, or that evolution either doesn't happen, or, even if it does, it can't produce new taxons so doesn't account for biodiversity or show how humans are an evolved ape.

So, it's refreshing to see how mathematics is being used by biologists, none of whom have shown any of the Creationist claims to be true. This is the result of mathematics being a description of reality, showing that biology is the result of the operation of natural forces without the need for magic or magic designers anywhere in the process. In so showing, of course, it refutes the entire basis of Creationism.

The following article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license, reformatted for stylistic consistency. Read the original article: