Rosa Rubicondior: Refuting Creationism - Hundreds of Rock Art Figures In Spain - From About 30,000 Years Before 'Creation Week'

Location of Cova de la Font Major

Hundreds of Ice Age rock art engravings discovered hidden in plain sight | Antiquity Journal

Sometimes a gap in our knowledge of the past is sitting right in front of us, waiting to be recognised. In the Cova de la Font Major in Catalonia, Spain, visitors spent decades passing ancient engravings without recognising their Palaeolithic origin. Some even added their own names and dates over them. A cave that became a tourist attraction in 1993 has now emerged as an important repository of Ice Age artistic expression — another contribution to the long human history that young-Earth creationism attempts to squeeze into a few thousand years.

A study published in Antiquity by Josep Maria Vergès Bosch and Míriam Salas-Altès describes 280 graphic motifs, including 55 animal figures, first recognised as a Palaeolithic assemblage in 2019. Horses, deer, bovids, caprines and a bear feature alongside non-figurative markings. The discovery challenges the apparent scarcity of Palaeolithic cave art in north-eastern Iberia and adds to the evidence for a distinctive Mediterranean artistic tradition.

The chronology deserves precision. These are not 280 engravings each supplied with its own radiometric date. Their attribution rests on archaeological context and comparisons with established artistic conventions. Radiocarbon evidence places episodes of human activity in the deeper cave between approximately 40,000 and 26,000 years ago, while features of some animal figures support a pre-Magdalenian attribution. Those contextual dates should not be mistaken for direct measurements of when individual images were made. Dating calcite covering one animal figure is a prospect for future research.

That distinction is a strength of the scientific account. It separates what has been measured from what has been inferred and identifies how the interpretation might be tested further. The resulting picture places these artistic traditions within an Ice Age human world, far beyond the approximately 6,000-year history favoured by many biblical literalists. Uncertainty about the precise age of a particular engraving does not provide positive evidence for a recent creation.

There is a second lesson here for anyone tempted to turn gaps in the archaeological record into gaps in human history. An apparent absence may reflect what has survived, where researchers have looked, or what observers have learnt to recognise. At Font Major, familiarity with the cave had not guaranteed understanding of its walls. Science advances by revisiting such assumptions and allowing evidence to change the picture. A chronology fixed in advance by religious doctrine has no equivalent freedom.

How do archaeologists date cave art when there is no paint to test? An engraving is a mark cut into a surface, not necessarily a deposit of material that can be dated. Measuring the age of the rock would tell us when the rock formed, not when someone scratched an animal into it. Archaeologists therefore distinguish between dating material used to make an image and dating evidence that constrains when the image could have been made.

Dating the artistic material

Where artists used charcoal, radiocarbon dating can sometimes provide an age for the carbon in the drawing. Even then, interpretation requires care: the measurement dates the source material, rather than the act of drawing. Old wood or previously deposited charcoal could have been used, and contamination must be assessed. Mineral pigments, such as iron-oxide ochre, cannot themselves be dated by radiocarbon because they contain no organic carbon.

Unpainted engravings generally offer no equivalent sample of artistic material. Their chronology must therefore be investigated through other evidence.

Dating mineral layers above or below the art.

Water moving through caves can deposit thin layers of calcite. Where these have a clear physical relationship to an image, uranium–thorium dating can provide age limits. The method measures radioactive changes within the calcite to estimate when it formed.

Calcite covering an engraving: the engraving must already have existed when the covering layer formed. A covering layer dated to 20,000 years ago would therefore establish that the engraving is at least that old.

An engraving cut into a dated calcite layer: the engraving must be younger than the material into which it was cut. A layer formed 30,000 years ago would establish that the engraving was made afterwards.

These are age limits, not necessarily the date of artistic activity. Researchers must establish which layer they have sampled and assess contamination or later chemical alteration that could affect the result.

Archaeological context and superimposition

Charcoal, tools and other remains can establish when people entered or used a cave. However, a fire lit 30,000 years ago does not automatically date a nearby engraving to the same period. A convincing connection requires additional evidence.

Physical relationships can be more restrictive. An engraving sealed beneath an undisturbed deposit must pre-date that deposit. Similarly, where one image cuts across another, the overlapping marks can reveal which came first. This establishes a relative chronology, even when neither image has a numerical date.

Artistic conventions provide supporting evidence

Archaeologists also compare the ways animals and signs were depicted with examples from independently dated contexts. Particular treatments of heads, limbs, horns or body outlines can help place an image within an artistic tradition.

Style is not a stopwatch, however. Conventions can persist, vary between regions or recur. Stylistic comparisons are therefore strongest when they agree with archaeological context and physical dating evidence.
What does this mean at Cova de la Font Major?

The Font Major study combines archaeological context with stylistic analysis to support the Palaeolithic attribution of the assemblage. Radiocarbon evidence documents episodes of human activity in the deeper cave approximately 40,000–26,000 years ago, but these are not direct dates for individual engravings. Some animal figures also display conventions associated with pre-Magdalenian art.

The researchers identify calcite covering at least one animal figure as a candidate for future uranium-series dating. Such a result could constrain that figure’s age, but would not automatically date every other engraving. Some markings, including a distinctive group of loop-shaped motifs, remain chronologically uncertain.

The essential point: an uncertain exact date is not the same as an absence of chronological evidence. Archaeologists build an interpretation from several kinds of evidence, distinguish measurements from inferences, and state which questions remain open.

Dating calcite over cave engravings at Creswell Crags.
Uranium-series dating of Palaeolithic art in Spanish caves.

The paper in Antiquity was announced in a news item from the journal:

Hundreds of Ice Age rock art engravings discovered hidden in plain sight
Archaeologists have discovered the third-largest assemblage of Ice Age cave art ever found in Mediterranean Iberia in a region thought devoid of cave art, transforming our knowledge of Palaeolithic European art.

Engravings of a series of parallel lines (above) and representation of a bear with ears shown in frontal perspective and a slightly open mouth (below)

Credit: Josep Maria Vergès Bosch & Míriam Salas-Altès

Since the 12^th century AD, people have been visiting the Cova de la Font Major in Catalonia. From 1957 onwards it was widely frequented by visitors, speleologists and treasure hunters and it was even converted into a tourist attraction in 1993.

Despite this, no art from the Ice Age had ever been discovered there and it was believed that the cave walls were unsuitable for the engraving of Palaeolithic art.

The Iberian Peninsula contains over 50% of all cave art documented in Upper Palaeolithic Europe, but its distribution is incredibly uneven, with a high concentration found in the Franco-Cantabrian region (located between modern France and Spain) but only two representations found in the entirety of Catalonia.

Until now, the Palaeolithic rock art identified in north-eastern Iberia has been very scarce compared with the abundant record of the neighbouring Franco-Cantabrian region.

Josep Maria Vergès Bosch, co-author
Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES-CERCA)
Tarragona, Spain.

This all changed when archaeologists identified 280 Palaeolithic motifs in the cave, located right under our noses the entire time. This is the highest concentration of Palaeolithic parietal representations currently known in Catalonia.

For more than six decades, thousands of visitors passed directly in front of the engraved surfaces, and in some cases inscribed names and dates over them, without the Palaeolithic origin of the figures being recognised.
.
Josep Maria Vergès Bosch.

This discovery means that Cova de la Font Major in fact contains the third-largest Palaeolithic cave art assemblage on the Mediterranean side of the Iberian Peninsula.

Along the Iberian Mediterranean façade, from the Pyrenees to Gibraltar, around 75% of known assemblages contain no more than five zoomorphic figures, and over 90% contain no more than 20. The sheer quantity of art discovered at the Cova de la Font Major is therefore particularly exceptional.

Míriam Salas-Altès, co-author
Departament d’Història i Història de l’Art
Universitat Rovira i Virgili
Spain.

The authors analysed the rock art and determined that the motifs are different from the art of the neighbouring Franco-Cantabrian region, leading them to conclude that this represents a distinct Palaeolithic artistic tradition.

These findings therefore demonstrate, for the first time, that north-eastern Iberia was home to its own particular artistic customs.

Importantly, the quantity of art could indicate that the region, previously seen as marginal, was in fact densely occupied, completely transforming our understanding of the Palaeolithic in the Western Mediterranean.

Contrary to what was previously thought, north-eastern Iberia holds first-rate Palaeolithic rock art sites. The Mediterranean art of western Europe is now enriched by a new body of rock art, which allows us to characterise in greater depth a Mediterranean graphic tradition with an identity of its own, distinct from that of the Franco-Cantabrian region

Míriam Salas-Altès.

Publication:
Vergès Bosch, Josep Maria, and Míriam Salas-Altès.
Filling Gaps: The Palaeolithic Rock Art of the Cova de La Font Major on the North-East Iberian Peninsula. Antiquity, 2026, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2026.10447.

Download PDF
Abstract

Until recently, Palaeolithic parietal art was scarce in the north-eastern Iberian Peninsula. An assemblage of engravings found within Cova de la Font Major in 2019, and described here, now calls this apparent artistic lacuna into question. Comprising 280 motifs, encompassing 55 zoomorphic figures and a range of non-figurative representations, the Font Major assemblage is positioned as one of the largest Palaeolithic cave art ensembles in the Iberian Mediterranean. Its recent discovery calls for a reconsideration of regional preconceptions, while the attribution of numerous representations to pre-Magdalenian phases establishes the site as a key reference for studying Palaeolithic symbolic expressions.

Figure 1.
Location of Cova de la Font Major; base map supplied by authors (figure by authors).

Figure 3.
Representation of a horse (sector 5), in which the limit of the conglomerate is used as the ground line for the figure (figure by authors).

Figure 4.
Representation of a descending cervid protome with the ears depicted (sector 3). The muzzle intersects a horizontal fissure, possibly representing a ground or water surface (figure by authors).

Figure 5.
Top) representation of a series of parallel lines (sector 5); bottom) partial view of panel 2 in sector 2, characterised by hundreds of loop-shaped engravings (figure by authors).

Figure 6.
Representation of the anterior half of an auroch with horns and ears depicted in frontal perspective (sector 5) (figure by authors).

Figure 7.
Representation of a bear with ears shown in frontal perspective and a slightly open mouth (sector 5), a singular taxon within the Palaeolithic art repertoire (figure by authors).

Figure 10.
Above) representations following the double-Y limb convention (hind limbs); below) figures with trilinear heads (figure by authors).

Vergès Bosch, Josep Maria, and Míriam Salas-Altès.
Filling Gaps: The Palaeolithic Rock Art of the Cova de La Font Major on the North-East Iberian Peninsula. Antiquity, 2026, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2026.10447.

Copyright: © [year] The authors.
Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd. Open access.
Reprinted under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0)

The engravings at Cova de la Font Major add another chapter to a human story far longer and richer than young-Earth creationism allows. Their significance lies not simply in the animals and abstract markings themselves, but in the evidence they preserve of people observing their surroundings and expressing ideas through images. We may never recover the precise meanings those images held for their makers, but that limitation does not diminish their value as evidence of an ancient cultural world.

Care is needed over the chronology: the radiocarbon dates establish episodes of human activity in the cave, while the attribution of the engravings draws on archaeological context and artistic conventions. Treating every figure as directly dated would overstate the evidence. Equally, treating the absence of a direct date for every figure as evidence for recent creation would confuse an unanswered question with support for a preferred belief. Scientific uncertainty has boundaries; it is not a licence to insert biblical mythology wherever a measurement remains unavailable.

The discovery also illustrates why apparent gaps in the archaeological record demand investigation rather than confident stories about what ancient people could not have done. Here, engravings survived in a cave visited by thousands, yet their Palaeolithic character went unrecognised. Once the evidence was identified and studied, the picture of regional artistic activity changed. Revising that picture is precisely what a method grounded in evidence is supposed to do.

For biblical literalism, the difficulty remains the same: a chronology derived from scripture cannot accommodate the deep human past revealed by archaeology without dismissing or distorting the evidence. Science can acknowledge uncertainty, test its interpretations and discover that familiar walls contain an unfamiliar history. The people who engraved those walls were under no obligation to fit a creation story written thousands of years later.

Advertisement

Amazon