F Rosa Rubicondior: Genetic error led humans to evolve bigger, but more vulnerable, brains

Wednesday 17 March 2021

Genetic error led humans to evolve bigger, but more vulnerable, brains

The skull of Australopithecus sediba, a species of Australopithecines, who were our ancestors and whose brains started to grow two to three million years ago.
Image credit: Australopithecus sediba by Brett Eloff,
Courtesy Profberger and Wits University.
Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
Genetic error led humans to evolve bigger, but more vulnerable, brains

If you're a creationist and need to protect yourself from the realities of science, then this is not for you. In particular, you should avoid reading the part highlighted in yellow below. The article quoted, from August 2018, refutes too many of your sacred dogmas, and without even trying:
  • No new information can arise by mutation.
  • All mutations are deleterious.
  • The Theory of Evolution is a theory in crisis, about to be overthrown and replaced by the evidence-free notion of intelligent [sic] design.
  • And your newest one - all mutations are 'devolutionary' not progressive (© 2019 Michael J Behe/Discovery Institute) invented after this open access paper was published, by someone claiming to be a biologist and posing as an expert on evolutionary theory!
A group of scientists led by Professor Pierre Vanderhaeghen of the Flanders Institute for Biotechnology, Belgium have discovered genes which produce the super-sized human brain in the developing human fetus.

According to the article announcing the research, printed in Horizon, the EU Research & Innovation Magazine:
One of the major features that distinguish humans from other primates is the size of our brains, which underwent rapid evolution from about two to three million years ago in a group of our ancestors in Africa called the Australopithecines. During this period, the human brain grew almost three-fold to reach its current size. Scientists know this from skull remains, but have puzzled over how it happened.

This year, the mystery was partially solved by Professor Pierre Vanderhaeghen at the Flanders Institute for Biotechnology in Belgium. Prof. Vanderhaeghen, who was conducting his work as part of the GENDEVOCORTEX project, went on a hunt for the genes that drove the growth of human brains.

Scientists had suspected that brain expansion began in our human ancestors when they evolved genes that are switched on in the foetus, when a lot of key brain development occurs. Prof. Vanderhaeghen therefore looked for genes present in human foetal tissue, but missing from our closest living relatives, apes.

His lab discovered 35 hominid - present only in apes and humans - genes that were active in foetal brain tissue. They then became intrigued by three specific genes – all similar to NOTCH genes, an ancient gene family involved in sending messages between cells and that are present in all animals. They found that the three new genes, collectively named NOTCH 2NL, were created by a copy and paste error of an original NOTCH gene.

This error created entirely new proteins which likely helped our ancestors' cerebral cortex to balloon. This is the part of our brain responsible for our language, imagination and problem-solving abilities. Scientists at the University of California, Santa Cruz, have also identified the NOTCH 2NL genes in DNA from Homo sapiens’ extinct cousins - the Neanderthals and Denisovans.

‘(The NOTCH 2NL) genes are only present in humans today. They were also present in Neanderthal DNA, but not in chimpanzees,’ Prof. Vanderhaeghen said.
[my highlighting]


These genes control the growth rate and differentiation of brain stem cells – the starter cells that multiply and give rise to all neurons in our brain – causing them to seed more nerve cells, which in turn helped to expand brain size. The genes likely led to more neurons and brain tissue in our ancestor’s descendants – including Neanderthals, Denisovans, and modern humans.

Prof. Vanderhaeghen’s research could also help to provide new insights into brain disorders. The US researchers linked genetic faults in DNA that were very similar to NOTCH 2NL, to children born with enlarged brains or small brains. Many of the new human-specific genes are located in a small area of our genome that plays an important role in brain size, according to Prof. Vanderhaeghen.

As DNA in this area closely resembles another part of the genome where it was originally cut and pasted from millions of years ago, errors are more likely, said Prof. Vanderhaeghen. ‘Patients who have (inherited) deletions in this area tend to be at risk of developing schizophrenia, whereas patients with duplications are more at risk of autistic spectrum disorder,’ he said.

Prof. Vanderhaeghen is now studying some 20 of the remaining human-only genes to see how they contributed to the evolution of the human brain.

Different people tend to carry different pieces of the Neanderthal genome. Something like 40-50% of the Neanderthal genome can still be found in people today...

There may even be other forms of extinct humans out there to be discovered by studying the DNA of the (ancient) bones we find.

Prof. Svante Pääbo,
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology,
Leipzig, Germany
The use of genetics to study human evolution in this way is helping to transform our understanding of how our own species compared to our ancestors. Traditionally, scientists have studied extinct species by looking at the fossilised remains of their bones. This was how they discovered the existence of Neanderthals, the extinct human species that lived across Europe and much of Asia before vanishing around 40,000 years ago.

In the last decade, however, scientists have begun to look at the DNA inside these bones. Professor Svante Pääbo, director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, has led the way in sequencing DNA of these extinct humans from small bone fragments.

This allows scientists to compare modern human DNA with that of extinct humans, rather than just living relatives like chimps. Already, the work has revealed some surprising findings – our own species appears to have interbred with some of these ancient relatives during our history.

Ancient humans

Scientists have found that the DNA of every person outside Africa is 1-2% Neanderthal, meaning that these extinct human relatives had offspring with our own ancestors.

That many people still retain Neanderthal DNA today could mean that it plays a role in our immune system.
Image credit - Frank Vinken,
Max Planck Society
‘Something like 40-50% of the Neanderthal genome can still be found in people today,’ he said.

According to Prof. Pääbo, we retained some of this DNA because it offered an advantage to our ancestors. ‘Some (of this retained DNA) has to do with the immune system, presumably helping us to fight off infectious diseases.’

The power of genetics to unravel the history of human evolution took a new twist in 2010 after Prof. Pääbo’s lab sequenced DNA from a finger bone fragment found by a Russian archaeological team in a remote Siberian cave.

The analysis revealed the bone belonged to a previously unknown human relative, now called Denisovans after Denisova Cave where the bone was found. This mysterious ancient human species lived at around the same time as Neanderthals, but further east into Asia.

Last year, Prof. Pääbo’s group published DNA sequences from a tooth found in the cave - the fourth ever Denisovan discovered. We now know Denisovan DNA carries more variation than Neanderthal DNA, leading scientists to conclude that they were more widespread than the better-known Neanderthals.

Denisovans left a more impressive stamp on some of us than Neanderthals, according to Prof Pääbo. Their DNA can be found in people across Asia today, while indigenous peoples of Papua New Guinea and Australia may carry up to 5%. Tibetans also carry some Denisovan DNA in their genomes, which has helped them adapt to life at high altitudes where there is little oxygen in the atmosphere.

Prof. Pääbo and his colleagues will soon publish their third high-quality genome – where almost the entire DNA sequence is intact – of a Neanderthal from Siberia. A deciphered genome of this quality allows for better DNA comparisons and could tell us more about the evolution of important genes – such as those linkd to the development and function of the brain. It will add yet another puzzle piece to help us understand the history of our closest extinct relatives, according to Prof. Pääbo.

‘There may even be other forms of extinct humans out there to be discovered by studying the DNA of the (ancient) bones we find,’ he said.

The research in this article was funded by the European Research Council. If you liked this article, please consider sharing it on social media.

The research findings were published, open access in Cell:
Graphical Abstract


  • Identification of >35 HS protein-coding genes expressed during human corticogenesis
  • NOTCH2NL human-specific paralogs of NOTCH2 expressed in human cortical progenitors
  • NOTCH2NL genes expand human cortical progenitors and their neuronal output
  • NOTCH2NL promotes Notch signaling through cis-inhibition of Delta/Notch interactions


The cerebral cortex underwent rapid expansion and increased complexity during recent hominid evolution. Gene duplications constitute a major evolutionary force, but their impact on human brain development remains unclear. Using tailored RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), we profiled the spatial and temporal expression of hominid-specific duplicated (HS) genes in the human fetal cortex and identified a repertoire of 35 HS genes displaying robust and dynamic patterns during cortical neurogenesis. Among them NOTCH2NL, human-specific paralogs of the NOTCH2 receptor, stood out for their ability to promote cortical progenitor maintenance. NOTCH2NL promote the clonal expansion of human cortical progenitors, ultimately leading to higher neuronal output. At the molecular level, NOTCH2NL function by activating the Notch pathway through inhibition of cis Delta/Notch interactions. Our study uncovers a large repertoire of recently evolved genes active during human corticogenesis and reveals how human-specific NOTCH paralogs may have contributed to the expansion of the human cortex.

Suzuki I, Gacquer D, Van Heurck R, Kumar D, Wojno M, Bilheu A, Herpoel A, Lambert N, Cheron J, Polleux F, Detours V, Vanderhaeghen P
Human-Specific NOTCH2NL Genes Expand Cortical Neurogenesis through Delta/Notch Regulation
1370-1384 e16 173 2018

Copyright: © 2028 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Open access
Reprinted under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 – NonCommercial – NoDerivs License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
So, there we are: a DNA copying error somewhere in our ancestry led to new genetic information that enabled our ancestors to grow a large part of our brain that is used for functions that set us apart from our close relatives. We can't know without the DNA evidence exactly when this happened but we can be sure it happened sometime in our ancestry after we diverged from the other African apes. This can be seen from the fact tht the mutation is not present in our ape relatives but is present in our cousin species, Neanderthals and Denisovans, with whom we share a common ancestor, probably Homo erectus which left Africa first and spread across Eurasia, having evolved a brain large enough for the intelligence needed to adapt to the conditions it found outside Africa, where the ability to make tools to make clothes and shelter and probably fire, and the cognitive skills to work empathetically in cooperative groups, would have been essential.

Would any creationist like to explain how this was not advantageous new information arising by mutation because the scientists who wrote this paper appear to think it was - a conclusion that only makes sense because the TOE, far from being a theory in crisis is the foundation of all modern biology.

submit to reddit

No comments :

Post a Comment

Obscene, threatening or obnoxious messages, preaching, abuse and spam will be removed, as will anything by known Internet trolls and stalkers, by known sock-puppet accounts and anything not connected with the post,

A claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Remember: your opinion is not an established fact unless corroborated.

Web Analytics