Terrestrial origins. The earliest known sirenians lived around 50 million years ago and were unmistakably terrestrial or semi-aquatic mammals. These animals had four fully developed, weight-bearing limbs, a robust pelvis attached to the spine, a body plan suited to walking on land and teeth and skull features consistent with herbivory.
There is nothing remotely “marine” about these animals in the way fish or even seals are marine. They are mammals with legs, lungs, and terrestrial locomotion, found in the correct geological context and dated consistently using multiple independent methods.
The foot of a manatee, showing its relationship to elephants.
Moreover, there is a clear transition from terrestrial to marine existence, showing gradual change, not sudden leaps. Later sirenians show a clear, stepwise shift toward an aquatic lifestyle. Across multiple species and millions of years, the same trends appear repeatedly: the hind limbs become shorter and less functional, the bones become abnormally dense (pachyosteosclerosis), acting as ballast, their bodies become more streamlined and locomotion shifts from walking to swimming.
Importantly, these changes do not occur all at once. There is no fossil where legs suddenly vanish, nor any leap from land mammal to modern dugong. Instead, the record shows exactly what evolution predicts: incremental modification constrained by existing anatomy.
The pelvis of a male dugong (Dugong dugong showing the vestige of the acetabulum (socket for the ball of the hip joint).
Moreover, as is common with evolutionary change, there is a legacy which doesn't fully disappear because there is no strong selection pressure to remove it provided the result is functional, even if sub-optimal. The manatees and dugongs are fully aquatic — but clearly never truly “designed” for the sea. They remain irretrievably tied to the surface because, like whales, dolphins, sea turtles and sea snakes, they retain a terrestrial respiratory system, so they breathe air using lungs. They have no gills, no counter-current exchange system, and no way to extract oxygen from water. As a result, they must surface regularly or drown. Although. like the whales and dolphins they give birth under water, the new-born calf must go quickly to the surface to take its first breath.
This is not what intelligent design for permanent aquatic life looks like. Fish solved this problem hundreds of millions of years ago. Sirenians did not — because they could not. Evolution works with what already exists. It would not have been beyond the capabilities of a truly omnipotent designer to equip these aquatic mammals with a fully functional aquatic respiratory system so freeing them from the limitation of needing to return to the surface every few minutes.
Creationists claim marine mammals are perfectly designed for the ocean, yet Sirenians are clearly adapted, not designed. Their reliance on lungs, their vulnerability to cold, and their limited diving ability all reflect inherited constraints from terrestrial ancestors.
Molecular genetic conformation.
So the reality of their anatomy and physiology, combined with the fossil record is enough to confirm the evolution of this class of mammals from terrestrial origins and their relationship to other Afrotheria - elephants and hyraxes.
But, as is so often the case, evolution doesn't depend on the fossil record entirely but is supported by several other strands of evidence. In this case, that confirmation comes from molecular genetics. As expected of a process which is essentially based in the genome, those of the Sirenia confirm both the relationships and the timeline of their evolution. Molecular genetics conforms what comparative anatomists had long suspected: Sirenia belong to the placental mammal clade Afrotheria, and their closest living relatives are Elephants and Hyraxes.
This grouping — Paenungulata — is supported by independent genetic datasets, shared skull and dental traits and embryological similarities. No 'kind' explanation predicted this relationship. It was not proposed to rescue evolutionary theory. It emerged from data and was confirmed repeatedly.
Creationists claim evolutionary relationships are invented to fit fossils, yet Sirenian genetics and sirenian fossils were studied independently and converged on the same conclusion — exactly as expected under evolution, and exactly what special creation fails to explain.
Diversity, specialisation, and extinction
Modern dugongs are the last survivors of a once-diverse lineage. Fossils reveal small coastal grazers, larger open-water species and the enormous Steller’s sea cow (Hydrodamalis gigas), driven to extinction within decades of human contact. This pattern — diversification followed by vulnerability due to specialisation — is a recurring feature of evolutionary history. It is also incompatible with the idea of optimally designed, immutable kinds.
Conclusion
Sirenia and the reality of deep time. Dugongs and their extinct relatives are exactly what evolutionary theory predicts. They show a clear terrestrial origin, gradual, traceable adaptation to aquatic life and retention of ancestral traits.
Their evolution has been independently confirmed by genetics. They do not “appear suddenly”. They are not isolated anomalies. They are part of a continuous, well-documented history of life on Earth. As with so many areas of biology and palaeontology, the difficulty for creationism is not that the evidence is unclear, but that it is far too clear. Sirenia expose the reality of descent with modification in a way that no amount of denial can erase.
Advertisement
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
All titles available in paperback, hardcover, ebook for Kindle and audio format.
Prices correct at time of publication. for current prices.
No comments :
Post a Comment
Obscene, threatening or obnoxious messages, preaching, abuse and spam will be removed, as will anything by known Internet trolls and stalkers, by known sock-puppet accounts and anything not connected with the post,
A claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Remember: your opinion is not an established fact unless corroborated.