Malevolent Design - Creationists Dogged By Parasites Again - Evolution or Malevolence?

Cross section of a dog's heart showing heartworm.

The University of Sydney

Ancient ‘spaghetti’ in dogs’ hearts reveals surprising origins of heartworm | EurekAlert!

An international team of researchers led by scientists at the University of Sydney, NSW, Australia, have just published a paper in Communications Biology which reshapes our understanding of a widespread canine parasitic nematode, the heartworm, Dirofilaria immitis. It is also more bad news for creationists, and for the intelligent design cult in particular.

In particular, the team have shown that this parasite has probably been co-evolving with dogs since before they were domesticated. It had previously been assumed that human activity was responsible for the spread of these worms.

Applying all the criteria traditionally cited by ID creationists as ‘proof’ of intelligent design, any designer of this parasite emerges as a grotesque malevolence determined to make dogs suffer. There is also the problem, for ID creationists, of clear evidence of a co-evolutionary arms race — the hallmark of mindless evolution and the antithesis of intelligent design.

Heartworms are complex organisms, with a complex life cycle involving both the primary host — dogs — and a vector — mosquitoes — all of which must be present for the parasite to survive, thus conforming neatly to Michael J. Behe’s supposed ‘evidence for intelligent design’: irreducible complexity. There is also evidence of resistance both to the dog’s immune system and, more recently, to the veterinary drugs used to treat the infection, conforming equally well to William A. Dembski’s proposed ‘evidence for intelligent design’: complex specified genetic information. So, within the ID paradigm, the conclusion becomes unavoidable — heartworms have been intelligently designed and are being actively redesigned in order to continue making dogs suffer and to stay ahead in their arms race with veterinary science.

But of course, the biological evidence shows that these parasites are the product of a co-evolutionary process in which neither magic nor intent were involved. Nematode genes have no concern for the suffering they cause, nor for whether their host lives or dies, so long as it survives long enough to pass the parasites on to the next generation of dogs.

Although the evidence conforms exactly to what the Theory of Evolution predicts — and evolution remains the most parsimonious explanation, absolving any deities of responsibility — for some inexplicable reason the ID cult would prefer people to believe that these, and thousands of other parasites, were the handiwork of their favourite deity, who thus emerges as a divine malevolence; a complete contrast to the supposedly omnibenevolent god of the holy books that creationists worship.

Ancient Footprints - Lessons From A French Cave

Human and canine prints found in Chauvet Cave.

M.A. Garcia
Ichnologie générale de la grotte Chauvet
Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française (2005), 102-1 pp. 103-108

Ancient Footprints: The Oldest Evidence of Human-Canine Relationships - History and Artifacts
It's easy to make up eye-catching stories about the past, by imaginatively stringing together a few facts, but is it science?

Whispers of the Ancients

Deep within the labyrinthine recesses of the Chauvet-Pont-d’Arc Cave, where the air hung thick with the scent of damp stone and ancient fires, an eight-year-old girl ventured forth. The elders had warned her — that part of the cave was forbidden. It was where the spirits of the great beasts dwelled, where their whispers echoed through the dark, and where even the bravest hunters dared not tread alone.

But the girl was no hunter—yet. And she was not alone.

By her side padded a massive wolf, its dark fur bristling as it moved with quiet confidence. They had grown together, these two—child and beast—inseparable since infancy, their bond forged in the flickering light of the hearth. The wolf was full-grown now, but the girl was still small, still fragile, her feet unsteady on the slick cave floor. Yet she pressed on, curiosity outweighing caution.

The torch in her hand sputtered as she stepped deeper into the shadows, its flame fed by a crude bundle of dried bark fibres and animal fat. The light danced across the walls, bringing to life the spirits of their ancestors—painted bison, galloping horses, towering mammoths—all shifting and writhing as if breathing. The girl had seen these images many times, had heard the shaman’s tales of how they held the souls of the animals her people hunted. But tonight, they seemed different. More alive. Watching.

Her wolf moved ahead, silent, its keen senses attuned to something unseen. The girl’s bare feet left faint imprints in the cool clay, slipping now and then, leaving streaks where she caught herself. Her companion, ever sure-footed, made no such mistakes. Their prints ran parallel, weaving through the traces of cave bears long gone—the ghosts of the great beasts that had once roamed this cavern.

Creationism in Crisis - Humans Had Domesticated Dogs At Least 10 Thousands Years Before 'Creation Week'

Siberian grey wolf, Canis lupus

Source: Pinterest

Siberian wolf, Canis lupus

Ancient Mitogenomes Reveal the Maternal Genetic History of East Asian Dogs | Molecular Biology and Evolution | Oxford Academic

These days, no serious scientist sets out to prove the Bible is wrong; discovering truth does that anyway - for anyone who can join the dots and do the simple logic. For example, humans could not have domesticated dogs some 23,000 years ago in Siberia by domesticating the local variety of grey wolf, if the Universe is just 10,000 years old.

And yet a paper published recently in the journal Molecular Biology & Evolution shows that they did exactly that.

In the context of mitochondrial DNA, what are haplotypes? In the context of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), haplotypes refer to specific combinations of genetic variants or polymorphisms within the mitochondrial genome. Unlike nuclear DNA, which is inherited from both parents, mtDNA is passed down exclusively from the mother to all of her offspring. This maternal inheritance pattern makes mtDNA useful for studying ancestry, population genetics, and evolutionary history.

A haplotype represents a unique combination of nucleotide variations or mutations along the mtDNA sequence. By analyzing these haplotypes, researchers can track maternal lineages, study population migrations, and infer evolutionary relationships among different groups of individuals. Haplotypes are often used in studies of human populations, as well as in forensic genetics and medical research related to mitochondrial disorders.

Refuting the Bible was almost certainly not the intention of the authors, jointly led by Songmei Hu, of Joint International Research Laboratory of Environmental and Social Archaeology, Shandong University, Qingdao, China, and Xijun Ni and Qiaomei Fu, both of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, but the facts they discovered do just that. They had set out to resolve the question of where exactly dogs had been domesticated, based on an analysis of the mitochondrial DNA.

Mitochondrial DNA (mDNA) is inherited through the maternal line, so an analysis of the geographical and temporal distribution of the various haplotypes of mDNA and how they relate to one another should give an indication of where and when the ancestral haplotype lived.

How the team did this is explained in their paper:

Canine Conundrum For Creationists

Amy2B copy number variation reveals starch diet adaptations in ancient European dogs | Open Science

Here is a sweet treat for dog lovers, anthropologists and evolutionary biologists, though not so much for creationists.

An open access paper published very recently in Royal Society Open Science not only sheds light on domestic dog and modern human co-evolution but illustrates an important principle in evolutionary biology: evolution will occur in the presence of a change in the environment with little or no change in the information in the genome. It also shows how gene duplication can play an enormous role in the evolution of a species.

How Wolves Evolved Into Dogs

How the wolf became the dog

There is no doubt now that the domestic dog is a domesticated wolf. It has recently been reclassified by taxonomists as a subspecies of wolf, Canis lupus, so instead of Canis familiaris it is now Canis lupus familiaris. It was almost certainly the first animal to be domesticated but ideas have differed over how this came about.

In 1907, Francis Galton proposed that humans had taken wolf puppies back to their camp and raised them, maybe as playthings for the children, but this view is now seen as naive. You can raise a wolf puppy by hand but you don't get a dog; you get a dangerous wild animal. The genes of children who played with growing wolf puppies would probably have been quite quickly eliminated from the human gene pool as well as the puppies' genes being eliminated from the wolf gene pool.

So, clearly something else happened.