Artificial Intelligence - How Good Is It And Will It Upset Creationists With Science?

Artificial Intelligence

How Good Is It And Will It Upset Creationists With Science?

I've been playing with the Artificial Intelligence App, Ask AI, available from Google Playstore.

I have to say it is pretty good at retrieving information quickly and accurately and presenting it in a well-written form. The following each took about 5 seconds to generate.

But is it accurate? Judge for yourself. The following was produced in the form of a .png image which I pasted into MS OneNote and extracted the text using OneNote's OCR. The formatting is mine:

Me:
Write a 2000 word essay on biological evolution

Ask Al Chat App:
Biological evolution is the process by which species of organisms change over time in response to changes in their environment, competition for resources, and other factors. It is a fundamental concept in biology that provides a framework for understanding the diversity of life on Earth and the relationships between different organisms.

The theory of evolution is based on the idea that all living things share a common ancestor and have descended from that ancestor through a process of gradual change. This process occurs through the mechanisms of natural selection, genetic drift, gene flow, and mutation. Natural selection is the process by which individuals with certain traits are more likely to survive and reproduce than others, leading to changes in the frequency of those traits within a population over time. This occurs because certain traits are better suited to the environment and enable the individuals possessing them to better compete for resources, avoid predators, or attract mates. For example, a population of moths that live in an area with light-colored tree bark may evolve to have lighter coloration over time, as darker moths are more easily spotted by predators.

Genetic drift is a random process that occurs when chance events lead to changes in the frequency of certain traits within a population. This can occur in small populations, where chance events such as the death of certain individuals or the migration of others can have a disproportionate impact on the genetic makeup of the population as a whole.

Gene flow occurs when individuals from one population migrate to another and breed with the members of that population, leading to the exchange of genetic material between the two groups. This can introduce new traits into a population or increase the frequency of existing ones. Mutation is the process by which changes occur in an organism's DNA, leading to the creation of new traits. These changes can occur randomly or in response to environmental pressures, and can have positive, negative, or neutral effects on an organism's survival and reproduction.

Together, these mechanisms of evolution have led to the incredible diversity of life on Earth, from the smallest microorganisms to the largest mammals. They have also enabled organisms to adapt to changing environments and to exploit new resources, leading to the colonization of new habitats and the development of new ecological niches.

One of the key pieces of evidence supporting the theory of evolution is the fossil record, which provides a record of the history of life on Earth. Fossils are the preserved remains of organisms that lived in the past, and they provide a window into the evolutionary history of different groups of organisms.

Fossils can tell us a great deal about the morphology, behavior, and ecology of extinct organisms,

First, note the American spelling in ‘behavior’ and the final comma at the end of the final sentence which suggests there was more to come (the essay is only about 450 words, not the 2000 asked for!). This was a trial version so maybe the full, paid-for version will deliver more and will have the facility to change languages/spelling?

[Later edit] I've now discovered that it delivers a chunk of text then waits for you to type 'continue' before it delivers the next chunk. Each chunk has its own output file.

The next comes with references, because I asked for them.

Me:
How are fossils dated? Please give references.

Ask Al Chat App:
Fossils are dated using a variety of techniques, depending on the age and type of the fossil. Here are some of the most commonly used methods:

1. Relative dating:
   This method involves comparing the ages of fossils to each other and to the surrounding rock layers. Fossils that are found in the same layer of rock are assumed to be of similar age. This method can provide a general idea of the age of a fossil, but it cannot give an exact date.
2. Radiometric dating:
   This method involves measuring the decay of radioactive isotopes in the fossil or surrounding rock. Different radioactive isotopes have different half-lives, which is the time it takes for half of the isotopes to decay. By measuring the ratio of the remaining isotopes to the original amount, scientists can determine the age of the fossil or rock. This method is particularly useful for dating fossils that are millions of years old.
3. Electron spin resonance (ESR) dating:
   This method involves using the natural radiation that is present in the environment to date certain types of fossils, such as teeth and bones. ESR dating measures the amount of trapped electrons in the fossil, which can provide an estimate of how long the fossil has been buried.
4. Thermoluminescence dating:
   This method is similar to ESR dating and also measures trapped electrons to determine the age of the fossil. However, it uses heat instead of radiation to free the electrons from the mineral lattice.
5. Dendrochronology:
   This method involves counting tree rings to determine the age of a fossil or artifact. This method is useful for fossils that are thousands of years old and have been reserved in tree trunks or other woody material.

References:

1. Swisher, C. C. Ill, Curtis, G. H., Jacob, T., Getty, A. G., Suprijo, A., and Widiasmoro. (1994).
   Age of the earliest known hominids in Java, Indonesia.
   Science, 263(51 50), 1 1 18-1121. https://doi.org/1 0.1126/science.8108729
2. Grün, R. (2006).
   Direct dating of human fossils.
   American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1 29(S43), 2-18. https://doi.org/l O. 1002/ajpa.20371
3. Richter, D., and Krbetschek, M. (1996). Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) dating

Again, it looks like the output was truncated as that last reference looks incomplete.

Me:
What is speciation and how is it achieved in nature. With references.

Ask Al Chat App:
Speciation is the process by which new species arise from existing ones. It occurs when populations of a single species become isolated from each other and evolve independently, accumulating genetic differences over time that eventually make interbreeding between the populations less and less likely. Eventually, the two populations may become so different that they are no longer able to interbreed, and are considered to be separate species.

There are several different mechanisms by which speciation can occur in nature. One of the most common is allopatric speciation, which occurs when a population becomes geographically isolated from the rest of its species, often by a physical barrier such as a mountain range or a body of water. Over time, the isolated population may accumulate genetic differences through mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift, eventually leading to the formation of a new species.

Another mechanism is sympatric speciation, which occurs when populations within the same geographic region become reproductively isolated from each other. This can occur through a variety of mechanisms, such as polyploidy (where an organism has more than two sets of chromosomes), habitat differentiation (where subpopulations become adapted to different ecological niches), or behavior isolation (where individuals within a population develop different courtship or mating behaviors).

There are also other mechanisms of speciation, such as parapatric speciation, where populations are partially isolated and form a hybrid zone, and peripatric speciation, where a small group of individuals becomes isolated from the larger population and forms a new species.

References:

• Coyne, J. A., & Orr, H. A. (2004).
  Speciation. Sinauer Associates.
• Schluter, D. (2000).
  The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press.
• Gavrilets, S. (2003).
  Perspective: models of speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution, 57(1 0), 2197-2215.

This will probably upset those few Creationists who have lqsted this far, despite all the scientific information:

Me:
How old is Earth and how do scientists know this? With references.

Ask Al Chat App:
The age of the Earth is estimated to be around 4.54 billion years old. This estimate is based on a variety of scientific methods, including radiometric dating of rocks and minerals, analysis of the Earth's magnetic field, and studies of meteorites and other objects in the solar system.

Radiometric dating involves measuring the decay of radioactive isotopes within rocks and minerals, which provides a way to determine the age of the material. The most commonly used method is uranium-lead dating, which involves measuring the decay of uranium-238 to lead-206. By analyzing the ratio of uranium to lead in a rock sample, scientists can determine the age of the rock.

Studies of the Earth's magnetic field also provide evidence for the Earth's age. The Earth's magnetic field is generated by the motion of molten iron in the planet's core, and the polarity of the field has reversed many times over the planet's history. By analyzing the magnetic properties of rocks, scientists can determine the age of the rocks and the timing of these magnetic reversals.

Meteorites and other objects in the solar system also provide clues to the age of the Earth. These objects are thought to have formed around the same time as the early solar system, and their ages can be determined through isotopic dating methods.

Overall, the age of the Earth is a well-established scientific fact, supported by a wide range of evidence from multiple scientific disciplines.

References:

• Dalrymple, G. B. (2004).
  Ancient Earth, ancient skies: the age of Earth and its cosmic surroundings. Stanford University Press.
• Harrison, T. M., & Yin, Q. Z. (2009).
  From the beginning of the Earth to the Moon. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 37, 1-24.
• Condie, K. C. (2018).
  Earth as an evolving planetary system. Academic Press.

And lastly (this might also upset Creationists, but not many of them will have lasted to this section anyway):

Me:
Why do biologists reject creationism?

Ask Al Chat App:
The rejection of creationism by biologists is based on a fundamental difference in the way that science and religion approach questions about the natural world. While religion relies on faith and belief in the supernatural, science is based on empirical evidence and the scientific method, which involves observation, hypothesis testing, and the accumulation of data through controlled experiments.

Creationism, which is the belief that the universe and all living things were created by a supernatural entity, is not supported by scientific evidence and is not testable using the scientific method. In contrast, the theory of evolution, which is widely accepted by biologists, is supported by extensive scientific evidence and has been subject to rigorous testing and scrutiny.

The theory of evolution is supported by a wide range of evidence from multiple scientific disciplines, including genetics, paleontology, biogeography, and comparative anatomy. This evidence includes the fossil record, which provides a record of the history of life on Earth, and the genetic code, which shows that all living organisms share a common ancestry and have evolved through a process of descent with modification.

Additionally, the theory of evolution has been subject to rigorous testing and scrutiny, with scientists constantly seeking new evidence and refining the theory as new data become available. This process of scientific inquiry is a key feature of the scientific method, and is essential for advancing our understanding of the natural world.

Overall, the rejection of creationism by biologists is not based on a bias against religion or a desire to undermine faith, but rather on a commitment to the principles of scientific inquiry and the pursuit of knowledge through empirical evidence and critical thinking.

References:

• National Academy of Sciences. (1999).
  Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences. National Academy Press.
• Coyne, J. A. (2009).
  Why Evolution is True. Viking.
• Dawkins, R. (2009).
  The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. Free Press.

Overall, I think this is going to make on-line research much simpler but it is probably wise to ask for references and to check them.

Thank you for sharing!

Tweet Link