Showing posts with label Culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Culture. Show all posts

Thursday, 22 August 2024

Refuting Creationism - Another Species Joins The List of Tool Makers and User - Humped Back Whales


Humpbacks bubble netting.
Humpbacks Wield and Manufacture Tools – Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology

The humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae, has one of the largest brains of any living species, beaten only by the larger blue whale, so it's not really surprising that it is yet another species that has been shown to do something that creationists like to use as 'proof' that humans are a special creation, apart from the rest of animal and plant life - the ability to manufacture and use tools.

As an aside, along with a fin whale, humpback whales are the only large whale species I have ever seen in the wild on a whale-watching trip from Boston, MA, USA about 12 years ago.

The tool they manufacture, then manipulate to give it maximum effect is the well-known 'bubble net', where a humpback circles round beneath a shoal of fish and blows a ring of bubbles which panic the fish into a tight group, through which the whale then rises with wide-open mouths, scooping hundreds or thousands of fish in a single mouthful. The process is repeated until the entire shoal has been consumed

At team of marine biologists from the Marine Mammal Research Program (MMRP) at University of Hawai'i, Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology (HIMB) and the Alaska Whale Foundation (AWF) have shown that not only do the whales manufacture this tool but then shape it to give it maximal efficiency.

What can you tell me about humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, and their hunting method of 'bubble netting'? Humpback whales, scientifically known as Megaptera novaeangliae, are large marine mammals famous for their acrobatic breaches and complex songs. These whales are found in oceans worldwide, migrating vast distances between feeding grounds in polar waters and breeding grounds in tropical or subtropical waters. Adult humpbacks typically range from 12 to 16 meters (39 to 52 feet) in length and can weigh up to 40 tons.

Bubble Netting: A Unique Hunting Strategy

One of the most fascinating aspects of humpback whale behavior is their unique hunting technique known as bubble net feeding or bubble netting. This cooperative and highly coordinated method is primarily used to catch krill and small fish, such as herring and mackerel, which are the whales' main prey.

How Bubble Netting Works:
  1. Group Coordination:
    • Bubble netting is a collaborative effort usually involving a group of humpback whales, although sometimes a single whale can perform a simplified version. The number of whales involved can range from a few individuals to a dozen or more.
  2. Creating the Net:
    • One or more whales swim in a circle beneath a school of fish, blowing bubbles from their blowholes. These bubbles form a cylindrical "net" that traps and corrals the fish towards the center. The whales swim in an upward spiral, often releasing a continuous stream of bubbles to create the net.
  3. Herding the Prey:
    • The bubbles and the noise made by the whales disorient and concentrate the prey into a tight ball. Some whales may produce loud vocalizations to further confuse the fish and drive them into the center of the net.
  4. The Final Strike:
    • Once the prey is trapped in the bubble net, the whales swim upward with their mouths open, engulfing thousands of fish or krill in a single gulp. Often, several whales will surface together with their mouths wide open, filtering the water through their baleen plates to capture the prey.

Significance and Adaptation:
  • Efficiency: Bubble netting is an incredibly efficient hunting strategy, allowing humpback whales to consume large amounts of prey with relatively little energy expenditure.
  • Communication: The whales must communicate and coordinate their movements precisely to perform this complex behavior, which involves a high level of social interaction and possibly even culture among groups.
  • Learning: Not all humpback whale populations engage in bubble netting. This behavior seems to be learned, passed down through generations, or shared between different groups of whales, indicating cultural transmission.

Bubble net feeding is a remarkable example of animal cooperation and ingenuity, showcasing the intelligence and adaptability of humpback whales in their quest for survival.
They have just published their finding, open access, in the journal Royal Society Open Science, and a press release explaining their work:

Humpbacks Wield and Manufacture Tools
In a study published today in Royal Society Open Science, researchers at the Marine Mammal Research Program (MMRP) at UH Hawaiʻi Institute of Marine Biology (HIMB) and Alaska Whale Foundation (AWF) consider a new designation of the humpback whales they study: tool wielders.

Researchers have known that humpback whales create “bubble nets” to hunt, but they have learned that the animals don’t just create the bubble nets; they manipulate this unique tool in a variety of ways to maximize their food intake in Alaskan feeding grounds. This novel research demystifies a behavior key to the whales’ survival and offers a compelling case for including humpbacks among the rare animals that manufacture and wield their own tools.

Many animals use tools to help them find food but very few actually create or modify these tools themselves. We discovered that solitary humpback whales in southeast (SE) Alaska craft complex bubble nets to catch krill, which are tiny shrimp-like creatures. These whales skillfully blow bubbles in patterns that form nets with internal rings, actively controlling details like the number of rings, the size and depth of the net, and the spacing between bubbles. This method lets them capture up to seven times more prey in a single feeding dive without using extra energy. This impressive behavior places humpback whales among the rare group of animals that both make and use their own tools for hunting.

Professor Lars Bejder, co-lead author
Director of MMRP
Marine Mammal Research Program
Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology
University of Hawaii at Manoa, Kaneohe, HI, USA.


Success in hunting is key for the whales’ survival. The population of humpback whales in SE Alaska overwinters in Hawaiʻi, and their energy budget for the entire year depends on their ability to capture enough food during summer and fall in SE Alaska. Unraveling the nuances of their carefully honed hunting technique sheds light on how migratory humpback whales consume enough calories to traverse the Pacific Ocean.

Advanced Tools & Partnerships are Key to Demystifying Whale Behavior

Marine mammals known as cetaceans include whales, dolphins, and porpoises, and they are notoriously difficult to study. Advances in research tools are making it easier to track and understand their behavior, and in this instance, researchers employed specialty tags and drones to study the whales’ movements from above and below the water.

We deployed non-invasive suction-cup tags on whales and flew drones over solitary bubble-netting humpback whales in SE Alaska, collecting data on their underwater movements. [The tools have incredible capability, but honing them takes practice]. Whales are a difficult group to study, requiring skill and precision to successfully tag and/or drone them.

William T. Gough, co-author
Marine Mammal Research Program
Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology
University of Hawaii at Manoa, Kaneohe, HI, USA.


The logistics of working in a remote location in SE Alaska brought its own challenges to the research.

We are so grateful to our research partners at the Alaska Whale Foundation (AWF) for their immense knowledge of the local area and the whales in that part of the world. This research would not have been possible without the strong collaborative effort with AWF.

Professor Lars Bejder.

More Insights and Improved Management to Come

Cetaceans throughout the globe face a slough of threats that range from habitat degradation, climate change and fisheries to chemical and noise pollution. One quarter of the 92 known cetacean species are at risk of extinction, and there is a clear and urgent need to implement effective conservation strategies on their behalf. How the animals hunt is key to their survival, and understanding this essential behavior makes resource managers better poised to adeptly monitor and conserve the feeding grounds that are critical to their survival.

This little-studied foraging behavior is wholly unique to humpback whales. It’s so incredible to see these animals in their natural habitat, performing behaviors that only a few people ever get to see. And it’s rewarding to be able to come back to the lab, dive into the data, and learn about what they’re doing underwater once they disappear from view.

William T. Gough.

With powerful new tools in researchers' hands, many more exciting cetacean behavioral discoveries lie on the horizon.

This is a rich dataset that will allow us to learn even more about the physics and energetics of solitary bubble-netting. There is also data coming in from humpback whales performing other feeding behaviors, such as cooperative bubble-netting, surface feeding, and deep lunge feeding, allowing for further exploration of this population’s energetic landscape and fitness.

Professor Lars Bejder.

What I find exciting is that humpbacks have come up with complex tools allowing them to exploit prey aggregations that otherwise would be unavailable to them. It is this behavioral flexibility and ingenuity that I hope will serve these whales well as our oceans continue to change.

Dr. Andy Szabo, c-lead author
AWF Executive Directo
Alaska Whale Foundation
Petersburg, AK, USA.

This groundbreaking work was made possible with support from Lindblad Expeditions - National Geographic Fund, the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, and a Department of Defense (DOD) Defense University Research Instrumentation Program (DURIP) grant.

This study was conducted under a NOAA permit issued to Alaska Whale Foundation (no. 19703). All research was conducted under institution IACUC approvals.
Abstract
Several animal species use tools for foraging; however, very few manufacture and/or modify those tools. Humpback whales, which manufacture bubble-net tools while foraging, are among these rare species. Using animal-borne tag and unoccupied aerial system technologies, we examine bubble-nets manufactured by solitary humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in Southeast Alaska while feeding on krill. We demonstrate that the nets consist of internally tangential rings and suggest that whales actively control the number of rings in a net, net size and depth and the horizontal spacing between neighbouring bubbles. We argue that whales regulate these net structural elements to increase per-lunge prey intake by, on average, sevenfold. We measured breath rate and swimming and lunge kinematics to show that the resulting increase in prey density does not increase energetic expenditure. Our results provide a novel insight into how bubble-net tools manufactured by solitary foraging humpback whales act to increase foraging efficiency.

1. Introduction
Tool use can be broadly defined as ‘the external employment of an unattached environmental object to alter more efficiently the form, position, or condition of another object, another organism, or the user itself when the user holds or carries the tool during or just prior to use and is responsible for the proper and effective orientation of the tool’ [1]. While this definition is widely used, some researchers have also emphasized the purposeful nature of tool use [2] and the way tools serve as extensions of the body to solve problems for which evolution has not provided a specific morphological adaptation [3] as alternative perspectives on the phenomenon. This emphasis on intent and problem-solving highlights the role that animal cognition, innovation and ingenuity play in the evolution of tool use.

Several mammalian [2,4,5], avian [6,7], fish [8] and insect [9] lineages include species that use tools; however, while taxonomically widespread, tool-using species are relatively rare. Rarer still are species that manufacture and/or modify their tools. Well-studied examples include free-ranging chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and orangutans (Pongo abelii), who manufacture specialized tools for extracting insects and fruits [1013]. Similarly, New Caledonian crows (Corvus moneduloides) and Goffin’s cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana) manufacture wooden tools for extracting vegetation and seed matter [1416]. Manufacturing tools in this way typically involves complex sequences of behaviour, such as selecting and detaching suitable vegetation, stripping bark and adjusting the resulting tool’s length and shape [14,17,18], to impose a novel, three-dimensional form onto natural material. This sophisticated, goal-directed behaviour, together with the comparatively large and complex brains that characterize tool-manufacturing species [19,20], has led researchers to suggest that the relative rareness of tool use and manufacture is cognitively constrained in its taxonomic distribution [11,15,19,21].

Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) are known to produce complex bubble structures— ‘bubble-nets’ [2225]. They do so by releasing air from their blowhole as they swim in a circular path below the surface. The rising bubbles form vertical curtains that appear as one or more rings from above. Aspects of bubble-nets and net-producing whales suggest that whales manufacture these nets as foraging tools [2]. For example, the use of bubble-nets has been observed repeatedly in association with foraging in allopatric humpback whale populations [23,24,2629]. Several researchers have noted differences in the size and shape of bubble-nets produced by whales between, and notably within, the same populations [24,25,30]. Some of these differences correlate with the number of individuals participating in the use of the net and/or the different types of prey they are targeting (e.g. Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii), juvenile salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) and krill (Order: Euphausiacea) [24,25,30]), suggesting that whales can exert control over their structure. Indeed, humpback whales’ flexible, spindle-shaped bodies, elongated pectoral flippers with large, rounded tubercles on their leading edge and out-sized tails [29,31,32] probably provide them with sufficient maneuverability [33] to manufacture nets that increase foraging efficiency under specific conditions.

In this study, we use observations from individually feeding humpback whales manufacturing bubble-nets in Southeast Alaska to examine how whales employ these tools to increase their prey intake and/or to decrease their energetic expenditure. To do so, we incorporate unoccupied aerial systems (UAS, or ‘drones’) coupled with photogrammetry techniques and non-invasive animal-borne tags equipped with motion sensors and video cameras to characterize the behaviour of solitary net-producing humpback whales and the nets they produce. Specifically, we describe net features, such as bubble-net size, shape and inter-bubble distance (‘mesh size’, i.e. the horizontal spacing between neighbouring bubbles), and consider how these modifiable attributes can contribute to an increase in prey intake for net-producing whales versus non-net-producing foraging whales. We also examine breath rates, lunge kinematics and dive behaviour to explore potential energetic costs associated with deploying bubble-nets. In doing so, we provide novel insights into the benefits that tool use provides foraging whales.
Figure 1. Variables and data collected from UAS and tagging methodologies. (a) UAS-derived bubble-net metrics for a two-ring bubble-net, including the area and diameter for the inner ring, and the horizontal inter-bubble distance (i.e. mesh size) for the outer ring. (b) Whale-producing bubble pulses, showing (i) left flipper, (ii) previous bubble pulse and (iii) new bubble pulse. (c) Whale with mouth open immediately prior to a lunge, with (iv) top jaw, (v) baleen rack, (vi) bottom jaw and (vii) right flipper visible. (d) Whale approaching the surface after a lunge, with the (viii) mouth closed prior to breaking the water’s surface and (ix) full bubble-net visible.

Figure 2. Data-driven simulation of a humpback whale manufacturing a bubble-net. (a) A zoomed-out view of average krill layer depth demonstrates the three-dimensional trajectory of a bubble-net feeding humpback whale from the start (white) to the end (pink) of the dive. (b) The UAS imagery alongside concurrent data-driven pre-lunge simulation showing 0.6 m s-1 rise rate of spherical cap leaders compared with 0.1 m s-1 rise rate for trailing capillary bubbles.
So, another one is added to the growing list of species that have abilities that were once claimed by creationists as proof of the unique, special creation of humans; an ability that takes intelligence, planning and, in the case of these whales, culture, since not all pods (yet) have this ability. When performing this technique as a group, it also involves planning, strategic thinking and communication in order to precisely coordinate the behaviour of each member of the pod.

Since this is a culturally transmitted, learned behaviour, there must have been a time when the skill was being perfected by careful observation, planning and experimentation, which implies simple scientific methodology and evaluation of the results.

Monday, 8 July 2024

Refuting Creationism - What The Bible's Authors Forgot About


Location of the AlUla and Khaybar Counties, with details of the Khaybar Oasis and Volcano cores zones under the remit of RCU.

© AAKSAK and the Royal Commission for AlUla.
A struggling people languishing across barren lands? No, evidence shows life in ancient Saudi Arabia was complex and thriving

Living not a stone's throw from the Canaanite Hills where the authors of genesis made up their origin myths and filled the gaps in their knowledge and understanding with magical tales of invisible sky gods made of nothing creating things out of nothing with a few magic words, there was a thriving community of semi-nomadic farmers. These neolithic people traded extensively in the area and may even have been ancestral to the Middle Eastern pastoralists, or at least had a strong cultural influence on them.

Contrary to the Bible's authors' tales of a Universe consisting of a small, flat planet with a dome over it, being magicked up out of nothing between 6,000 and 10,000 years ago, and a global genocidal flood 4000 years ago, there were people building circular buildings in what is now North West Saudi Arabia between 6,500 and 8,000 years ago, and the remains of their dwellings show no signs of ever having been inundated.

That the Bible's authors, who had only oral traditions to go on, failed to acknowledge these near neighbours, speaks to their culturally chauvinistic parochialism and their intention to create the belief that they, and they alone, were the descendants of a magically-created first couple, created without ancestors, although they show some signs of awareness of other people in their tale of the sons of that first couple managing to find wives.

So, how do we know about these neolithic people from North West Arabia? From the artifacts and remains of buildings which would have been destroyed and swept away, or at least covered in a deep layer of fossil-bearing silt, by a global flood deep enough to cover the highest mountains in which almost every living thing perished, had it been a real event.

How these were discovered is the subject of an article in The Conversation by Jane McMahon, Research Associate, Discipline of Archaeology, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Her article is reprinted here under a Creative Commons license, reformatted for stylistic consistency:

Sunday, 7 July 2024

Refuting Creationism - More On The Oldest Cave Art From 41,200 Years Before Creation Week


Found in a cave in Indonesia, we can now show the world’s oldest figurative art is 51,200 years old

Just a couple of days ago I wrote about the oldest known cave art, in Indonesia from 41,200 years before Creationists believe the Universe existed. As expected, this news has been completely ignored by creationists, presumably through fear of having to consider the terrifying prospect of being wrong and so not as important as they like to think they are.

Here then is an article about the discovery from The Conversation by four of the authors of the paper in Nature from Australian Universities - Adhi Oktaviana, PhD Candidate in Archaeology, Griffith University; Adam Brumm, Professor of Archaeology, Griffith University; Maxime Aubert, Professor of Archaeological Science, Griffith University and Renaud Joannes-Boyau, Professor in Geochronology and Geochemistry, Southern Cross University.

Their article is reprinted under a Creative Commons license, reformatted for stylistic consistency:

Thursday, 4 July 2024

Refuting Creationism - Indonesian Cave Painting From 41,200 Years Before 'Creation Week' - Untouched By The 'Global Genocide'!


Oldest known picture story is a 51,000-year-old Indonesian cave painting | Archaeology | The Guardian

Another drop in the torrent of counter-evidence engulfing creationism came today with the news that a team of archaeologists led by experts from Griffith University, Australia have dated a painting found in a cave in the Indonesian island of Sulawesi, to be from at least 41,200 years before the legendary 'Creation Week'. This adds yet more data to the mountain of evidence showing the authors of Genesis didn't know what they were taking abut so just made stuff up.

To be fair to the story-tellers, how could they possibly have known about caves in Indonesia, let along what early humans had been doing in them? They thought the Universe was a small, flat place with a dome over it, centred on the Middle East.

Tuesday, 2 July 2024

Refuting Creationism - An Australian First Nation Ritual From Before 'Creation Week' and Through Creationism's Genocidal Flood


Professor Bruno David (left) and Uncle Russell Mullett were part of a research team who excavated Cloggs Cave in Gunaikurnai Country.

Supplied: Gunaikurnai Land and Waters Aboriginal Corporation.
New archaeological find uncovers 12,000 year old First Nations ritual - Monash University

The problem with creationism's origin myths is that the people who made them up only knew of their small area around the Canaanite Hills, so they had no idea what was happening elsewhere or any history of life on Earth of other human cultures. Indeed, because they thought the entire Universe consisted of a small, flat planet with a dome over it, they didn't even suspect there might be inhabited land in a southern hemisphere of a spheroid planet.

So, news that the GunaiKurnai Land and Waters Aboriginal Corporation (GLaWAC) and Monash University researchers have unearthed evidence of rituals dating back 500 generations (i.e. 12,000 years, or 2,000 years before the Bible's authors imagined the Universe was created) and that the ritual is till used today, having survived the legendary global genocidal flood that the Bible's authors imagined, along with this archaeological evidence in a cave that would have been flooded by any such global flood, had it really happened.

Saturday, 22 June 2024

Creationism in Crisis - How Macaques Can Adapt Their Culture When They Need To - Just Like Humans


Hurricane Maria destroyed 63% of vegetation on Cayo Santiago.
Credit: Lauren Brent
Hurricane changed ‘rules of the game’ in monkey society - News

The childish notion of human exceptionalism took another blow recently when a group of researchers showed how macaque monkeys can change their culture to adapt to changes in their environment.

As with humans, macaque cultural ethics is an agreed standard of behaviour that enables the group to remain cohesive and survive in adversity. Unlike creationists, macaques don't require a handbook to know how to behave decently towards others because, like normal humans, they too have empathy and will treat others as they would want to be treated.

This was illustrated recently when macaques were seen to change their behaviour when hurricane Maria destroyed the 63% of the vegetation on their home island of Cayo Santiago, reducing the amount of shelter from the heat of the sun.

Wednesday, 19 June 2024

Creationism in Crisis - Human Culture Is A Cumulative Process Which Started 590,000 Years Before 'Creation Week'


ASU study points to origin of cumulative culture in human evolution | ASU News
Stone tools that become increasingly more complex over the course of 3 million years. Left: First time period studied — Oldowan core, Koobi Fora, Kenya (below baselines). Center: Second time period studied — Acheulean cleaver, Algeria (around baseline). Right: Characteristic of 600,000 year ago technology — Levallois core, late Pleistocene Algeria.

Image credits: (left) Curry, Michael. 2020. Oldowan Core, Koobi Fora. Museum of Stone Tools. Retrieved June 10. From: https://une.pedestal3d.com/r/DGHMTdkn4_;
(middle) Curry, Michael. 2020. Acheulean Cleaver, Morocco, Koobi Fora. Museum of Stone Tools. Retrieved June 10. From: https://une.pedestal3d.com/r/JMVajqyz29;
(right) Watt, Emma. 2020. Levallois Core, Algeria. Museum of Stone Tools. Retrieved June 10. From: https://une.pedestal3d.com/r/JMVajqyz29.
More evidence was provided yesterday of human history and the beginnings of human culture about 600,000 years ago, i.e., about 590,000 years before creationists claim Earth was magicked up out of nothing as a small flat planet with a dome over it in the Middle East. The evidence comes in the form of a research paper by Arizona State University researcher Charles Perreault and doctoral graduate Jonathan Paige.

Generally speaking, human culture has been like a snowball rolling down a snow-covered hillside. The bigger the snowball gets, the more snow it accumulates, so its growth is exponential. Interestingly, and something for creationists to ignore, is the fact that human cultural evolution began before anatomically modern humans had evolved, so, as Homo sapiens, as with our genes, we inherited the beginnings of our culture from an ancestral species.

Contrast that with the childish creationist origin myth which has humans all descending from two individuals magically created without ancestors.

How the two authors carried out their research is the subject of an Arizona State University (ASU) news release by Julie Russ:

Wednesday, 12 June 2024

Creationism in Crisis - Elephants Know One Another by Name - Just Like Humans


Elephants have names for each other like people do, new study shows - Warner College of Natural Resources

It's an article of faith in creationist cults that humans are a special creation, materially different to other animals and the evidence for this is that we have unique characteristics, ignoring for the moment that every species has unique characteristics, which is what makes them distinct species. And the list of 'uniquely human' characteristics which by creationist circular logic is 'evidence' of human uniqueness, includes language, culture, intelligence, the ability to make and use tools, a sense of self-identity, compassion, empathy, and love and affection.

The problem is, the items on this list keep on being found to not be unique to humans after all, but to be characteristic of lots of other species.

Saturday, 6 April 2024

Superstition News - How Belief in God(s) Evolved in Human Culture


Christian church service
Why Do People Believe in God? | Psychology Today

From the point of view of an Atheist like me who realised religion was nonsense at the age of 9 and have been an atheist ever since, the fact that grown adults believe in a magic man in the sky who magically makes things happen does seem incredible.

It gets even more incredible that grown adults believe that, although omniscience and having a perfect plan for our individual lives, he needs to be told of bad things that need to be changed because he either doesn't know they're happening or doesn't know they are wrong.

And yet, for most people in the world, the answer seems obvious: Because it’s self-evident that God exists. From the point of view of the believer, the really puzzling question is how anyone could not believe.

Shinto shrine in Kyoto, Japan
So why do so many grown adults believe in at least one god, or if they're Hindu or Shintoist, or one of the other polytheist religions, several gods?

According to a 2018 article in Psychology Today by David Ludden, PhD, professor of psychology at Georgia Gwinnett College, religion is an evolved feature of human culture and there was a time when people didn't believe in gods.

In his article he makes the following key points:
  • Early in the history of humans, nobody believed in a god of any sort.
  • Religious belief is considerably lower in developed countries compared with the underdeveloped world.
  • Believing that God has a plan helps people regain some sense of control, or at least acceptance.

Friday, 8 March 2024

Creationism in Crisis - Like Humans, Bumblebees Learn Through Social Interaction And May Have Cumulative Culture


Buff-tailed Bumblebee, Bombus terrestris
Source: Wikipedia.
Bees master complex tasks through social interaction - Queen Mary University of London

A sacred Tenet of creationism is that we humans are a special creation by the creator of the universe who made everything just for us. They point to the many 'unique' traits and abilities of humans as evidence of this - the ability to teach and learn, to form cultures, even walking upright are frequently cited as examples. It's also a sacred Tenet of creationism that anything which might refute the sacred tenets of creationism must be ignore, hand-waved aside or misrepresented but never, ever acknowledged for what it is - a refutation of creationism.

So, we can expect one or more of those tactics for handling the cognitive dissonance that news that bumble bees can teach and learn and so have at least the basis for forming cumulative cultures. The news itself comes in the form of an open access research paper in Nature by a team Led by Dr Alice Bridges and Lars Chittka, Professor of Sensory and Behavioural Ecology at Queen Mary University of London.

The team showed that a complex, two-step task, which needed to be performed to receive a reward in the form of a sweet liquid could be learned by bees who were allowed to watch a trained 'demonstrator' perform the task. The bees not only learned how to perform the steps involved but that there was a reward to be had for doing so.

The 'demonstrators' had previously been trained by giving intermediate rewards as each stage was completed successfully, which were eventually withdrawn, leaving only the final reward. The experiment and its significance are explained in a Queen Mary University news release:

Sunday, 11 February 2024

Creationism in Crisis - Social Learning Is Part of Beaked Whale Culture - Just Like Humans


Surprising Behavior in One of the Least Studied Mammals in the World - SDU

Continuing where I left off with the account of how orcas (killer whales) form distinct cultures based on food, hunting strategies, location and dialect, which parallel human cultures in many way, we now have evidence that at least one of the 24 known species of the beaked whales, Baird's beaked whale, form cultural groups, and that another 'human' trait - social learning - is involved in the formation of these cultures.

Creationists, of course, continue to insist that only humans form cultures and have the social ethics that hold them together because they were specially created in a way that makes them materially different to all other animals, and by the circular reason that often typifies creationist arguments, this proves they were specially created by a god who holds them in the highest esteem.

s But as we are learning, almost all the traits creationists try to claim are uniquely human and therefore proof of our special creation, are turning out to be common to many other species, especially mammals, and so are evidence for common ancestry and evolution by descent with modification.

The little-known beaked whale, a relative of orcas and dolphins, has recently been observed changing its habitat and hunting strategy by a process of social learning. This is the same process by which growing children adopt the social norms and customs of their culture and how people from other cultures can assimilate into unfamiliar cultures. Essentially it means observing others and memorizing what they do in any given situation.

This observation was made by researchers from the University of Southern Denmark (SDU) led by Olga Filatova, a whale expert and postdoc at Department of Biology and SDU Climate Cluster. She led the study which showed that some pods of orcas in the Pacific have occupied the same area since the last Ice Age glacial maximum, 20,000 years ago when they occupied warmer refugia and adopted them as permanent territories. The same study showed how orcas form distinct 'ecotypes' which are genetically isolated from other ecotypes by cultural barriers to interbreeding.

For the beaked whale study, the team observed a population of Baird's beaked whales, which has unexpectedly been found near the coast and in shallower waters than previously observed.

Their work has been published, open access, in the journal Animal Behaviour and is explained in a SDU press release by Birgitte Svennevig:

Saturday, 10 February 2024

Creationism in Crisis - How Killer Whales Were Evolving Cultural Groups - 20,000 Years Before 'Creation Week'


Researchers find 20,000 years old refugium for orcas in the northern Pacific - SDU
The northern Pacific near Japan and Russia is home for several different groups of orcas. They have no contact with each other, do not seek the same food, do not speak the same dialect, and do not mate with each other. Some are the descendants of a pod that moved there during the last Ice Age.

Any study of whales, such as dolphins and they larger cousins, the orca's or killer whales will quickly dispel one of the myths creationists use to try to justify their absurd belief that humans are somehow materially different to the rest of life on Earth in a way which isn't just because we are a variation on the general mammalian theme with enough distance between us and related species to justify a separate taxon, because we were specially created - humans form cultures and have languages and traditions, etc.

Of course, it's not just the whales that have cultures and languages; chimpanzees and bonobos and other primates also have distinct cultural groups that differ significantly from one another, but this article deals specifically with orcas and the research which has shown that they moved into Ice Age refugia at the last glacial maximum, some 20,000 years ago, and some have slayed there ever since.

The article also illustrates a problem of modern taxonomy in how to define a species with hard and fast rules when the distinction in reality is fuzzy. Some of the pods studied form isolated cultural groups that seek different foods to the others, which speak a different dialect, move in a specific area, and never interbreed. This cultural barrier to hybridization is as much a barrier as is the different plumage and mating rituals that are the pre-zygotic barriers to interbreeding that justify classifying many related birds as distinct species because the barriers ensure an isolated gene pool in species that could successfully interbreed and do so in captivity. Killer whales exist in many pods with cultural barriers to interbreeding and so form isolated gene pools, yet they are regarded as a single species.

To overcome this problem, biologists have classified the different killer whale pods into 'ecotype', but it is this genetic isolation that enables genetic analysis to determine how long the pod has been isolated.

A research team led by whale biologist, Olga Filatova, of the University of Southern Denmark recently published an open access paper in the journal Marine Mammal Science showing how environmentally stable marine regions may have preserved refugial populations of the killer whale that retained historical genetic and cultural diversity. These whales are believed to have moved into the warmer refugia during the last Ice Age.

The team's work is explained in a University of Southern Demark (SDU) press release by Birgitte Svennevig:

Friday, 12 January 2024

Unintelligent Design - Neurodegenerative Diseases Such As MS & Alzheimer's Traced Back To Early North European Farmers - 24,000 Years Before 'Creation Week'


Life in Bronze Age Britain (artist's impression)
Ancient DNA reveals reason for high MS and Alzheimer's rates in Europe

Researchers have just completed a massive gene bank for ancient humans who lived in Eurasia up to 34,000 years ago (i.e., up to 24,000 years before creationist dogma says the universe and everything in it was magicked out of nothing by a god made of nothing who self-assembled out of nothing before there was time and space to self-assemble in.

The gene bank has enabled researchers to trace the historical and geographical spread of genes and diseases, producing four papers published in Nature. This article deals with just one of them; others will follow.

The results should disturb any creationists who has the courage to read about them because, not only did it all occur long before the mythical 'Creation Week' that is central to their superstition, but is shows that any designer either could not have been omniscient, or must have been malevolent, because it shows how the genes for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) arose in North Europe, probably as a side-effect of evolving genes to increase resistance to the diseases carried by domestic animals. An omniscient designer who deigned them should have been aware of what they would also cause, so either isn't omniscience and didn't know what its design would do, or created MS deliberately.

As the University of Cambridge News release explains:

Thursday, 4 January 2024

Creationism in Crisis - Monogamy Predates Christianity By Millions of Years


Early Primates | | UZH
Religious fundamentalists like to assume they have ownership of the institution of marriage because the 'right' form of marriage was dictated by their imaginary god so we should all subscribe to their approved form of it. In many formerly majority Christian countries, the Christian-based marital laws are one of the few remaining vestiges of a time when Christianity imposed itself on everyone, believers, non-believers and non-Christians alike, arrogantly believing it had a divine right to rule.

But recent research has shown that a form of flexible monogamy, or more or less stable social parings of a female and a male is common if not the norm in the primate family. It was most likely incorporated into religions because some human tribes thought of monogamy as the 'right' form of sexual relationship, so any god whom the priesthood wanted to be taken seriously had to hand down 'morals' that the people thought were right and proper. After all, the only way to tell if a god is a good god or an evil god is to compare its morals and behaviour to that of an external standard of 'good', is it not?

If you think not, you have to believe that if your god had told people to hurt babies, rob banks and hit old ladies, those would now be considered moral acts and people who didn't do them would be regarded as immoral and deserving of punishment or other social sanctions. Christian apologist for faith-based genocide, William Lane Craig, has even declared that a seemingly immoral act such as infanticide, is morally right if you believe his (but only his) god commands it, and it would be immoral not to carry out such a divine command.

But William Lane Craig's repugnant idea of what constitutes morality is straying somewhat off the point, which is the 'right' form of marriage in human society, which William Lane Craig presumably believes is divinely commanded by his god and therefore mandatory for the rest of us.
But, absolute monogamy is not the universal norm in modern human sexual relationships, even in societies which only permit monogamous marriage, and probably never has been. Humans can best be described as mostly monogamous, most of the time, with 'infidelity' by both sexes being fairly common to the extent that some estimates put the number of people who have a different father to the one they think is theirs at about 25%. In some cultures, such as Islamic, bigamy is normal and, as evidenced by baptism records, pre-marital sex was commonplace in 19th Century England.

Sunday, 17 December 2023

Creationism in Crisis - The Woolly Dogs Of The American Coast Salish People Predate 'Creation Week'


Researchers, Coast Salish People Analyze 160-Year-Old Indigenous Dog Pelt in the Smithsonian’s Collection | Smithsonian Institution
The reconstructed woolly dog shown at scale with Arctic dogs and spitz breeds in the background to compare scale and appearance; the portrayal does not imply a genetic relationship.
Credit: Karen Carr.
During that long period of Earth's 'pre-Creation Week' history, before anyone told the people of Siberia that they should wait to be created then wiped out in a genocidal flood before forgetting all about it and only then going to live elsewhere, they migrated to North America, taking their domestic dogs with them.

This is the sort of nonsense that creationism requires you to believe in order to reconcile the scientific evidence with the creation myths of a bunch of Bronze Age Canaanite farmers who thought Earth was small, flat and had a dome over it to keep the water above the sky out. Obviously, these people had almost certainly never heard of Siberia or North America or realised that there were other people living there and were as ignorant of most of Earth's long history as they were of cosmology, biology and geology.

One of the things the Bronze Age Canaanites would never have guessed was that some of the domestic dogs the Siberians took with them had genes for a dense wooly fur that could be woven into blankets and other fabrics, but now a team of researchers from the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History have carried out a detailed DNA analysis of the pelt of the last known example of this breed of dog (a dog known as Mutton). Mutton died in 1859 and his pelt was sent to the Smithsonian Institute where it remained until it was rediscovered in the early 2000's.

The analysis has shown that the line diverged from the other dogs about 5,000 years ago (i.e., before creationist superstition says all life on Earth was exterminated in a genocidal flood when their 'all-loving' god flew into a rage because its creation wasn't working as intended).

They have shown that its closes genetic relationship is with the pre-colonial dogs from Newfoundland and British Columbia. The Indigenous Coast Salish communities in the Pacific Northwest (in Washington state and British Columbia) for millennia held these wooly dogs in high esteem, regarding them almost as family members and often keeping them in pens or on islands to prevent them interbreeding with other dogs, to maintain the quality of their wool. This isolation prevented the ingress of genes from other dogs and even from the dogs later colonists brought with them. The genes recovered from Mutton's pelt show that 85% of his genes were from pre-colonial dogs.

The Smithsonian researchers have, with the assistance of Coast Salish Elders, Knowledge Keepers and Master Weavers, now traced the place of the woolly dogs in Coastal Salish culture and the reasons for its decline. Their findings are published in Science and tell a sorry tale of colonial destruction of a people and their culture. Instead of, as has been suggested, the arrival of machinery and woven blankets made the wooly dogs expendable, the truth is that, due to disease and colonial policies of cultural genocide, displacement and forced assimilation, it likely became increasingly difficult or forbidden for Coast Salish communities to maintain their woolly dogs and a 1000 years or more of careful selective breeding was wiped out within a couple of generations.

Sunday, 1 October 2023

Creationism in Crisis - Killer Whales Exibit 'Uniquely Human' Behaviour


Why Are Killer Whales Harassing and Killing Porpoises Without Eating Them? | UC Davis
A pod of Southern Resident orcas
Photo: NOAA Fisheries.

The problem creationists have with trying to cling to a counter-factual superstition like theirs is that so many facts run counter to it. To normal people, that might be considered a good reason to reassess their opinions and drop those shown to be at odds with the facts and form some based on reality instead.

Not so creationists. To a creationist, the thought of being wrong is an existential threat which, if allowed to develop, would destroy their entire world view which has them at the centre of a specially created universe, the creator of which holds them in high regard. Dropping this childish belief would mean they don't feel as important as they think they are and would maybe have to think the unthinkable - a universe which doesn't have them at the centre of it and eventual oblivion in which the world continues to exist and function without them in it or able to observe it from a privileged position.

The Salish Sea. Location for the study.
All my recent blog posts, especially the 'Creationism in Crisis' series, have shown instances where scientific research has revealed facts which refute basic creationist articles of faith and cult dogmas, and this one is no exception. It deals with a core dogma - that humans were a special creation, created in some material way differently to all other life forms, to which they bear no relationship.

Traditionally, creationists cite examples of how humans are unique, having characteristics shared by no other species - ignoring the fact that that pretty much defines a species and the same case can be made for every other species. One of these is of course another creationist sacred cow - humans have social ethics and a conscience, which creationist dogma asserts could only have come from their particular creator god - the same god whom they believe inflicted a mass genocide on Earth and creates parasites, apparently.

Explaining social ethics, or pr-social behaviour, and a conscience which motivates pro-social behaviour, rewarded by endorphins, is not difficult for science to explain as the result of gene-meme co-evolution in a cooperative species that could not survive as individuals without the support of a social group.

And, to reinforce that, we now have evidence of pro-social behaviour and human-like activities in another species - the orca or killer whale.

At least, that's the explanation for an observed change in behaviour of a pod of orca in the Salish Sea, described in a paper published, open access, in Marine Mammal Science. The investigating team was co-led by Deborah Giles of Wild Orca and Sarah Teman of the SeaDoc Society, a program of University of California Davis (UCDavis) School of Veterinary Medicine.

First a little background on the Southern Resident killer whales, the subject of the study:

Monday, 10 April 2023

Creationism in Crisis - The Mediterranean Monk Seal Is Making a Comeback Thanks to Human Cultural Evolution

Creationism in Crisis

The Mediterranean Monk Seal Is Making a Comeback Thanks to Human Cultural Evolution
Monk seal, Monachus monachus
Creationism in Crisis

The Mediterranean Monk Seal Is Making a Comeback Thanks to Human Cultural Evolution
Monk seal, Monachus monachus
Creationism in Crisis

The Mediterranean Monk Seal Is Making a Comeback Thanks to Human Cultural Evolution
Monk seal, Monachus monachus
Creationism in Crisis

The Mediterranean Monk Seal Is Making a Comeback Thanks to Human Cultural Evolution
Monk seal, Monachus monachus
Creationism in Crisis

The Mediterranean Monk Seal Is Making a Comeback Thanks to Human Cultural Evolution
Monk seal, Monachus monachus
Creationism in Crisis

The Mediterranean Monk Seal Is Making a Comeback Thanks to Human Cultural Evolution
Monk seal, Monachus monachus

Monk sealMonachus monachus
The Mediterranean Monk Seal Is Making a Comeback | Science | Smithsonian Magazine

With 99% of all known species having gone extinct, creationists still like to imagine an omniscient god created them. One must assume, therefore, that they believe it created them to go extinct!

It's a strange sort of intelligence that would intelligently design something to fail, but that's the sort of double think creationists need to be capable of to be members of their anti-science cults.

But the good news is that one of these 'creations', the Mediterranean Monk seal, is making something of a comeback, having been reduced to about 800 individuals, mostly around the coast of Greece.
The Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus) is one of the world's most endangered marine mammals and is the only seal species endemic to the Mediterranean Sea. The species is characterized by its monk-like hood, and its gray-brown fur with lighter colored undersides.

Here are some key facts about the Mediterranean monk seal:

Habitat: Mediterranean monk seals are found in the Mediterranean Sea and the eastern Atlantic Ocean, primarily along the coastlines of Greece, Turkey, and North Africa.

Population: According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Mediterranean monk seal population is estimated to be between 500 and 700 individuals, making it one of the rarest mammals in the world.

Threats: The primary threats to Mediterranean monk seals include habitat loss, human disturbance, entanglement in fishing gear, and hunting. The species has been heavily exploited for its fur, oil, and meat, and has suffered from a decline in its prey species due to overfishing.

Conservation Efforts: The Mediterranean monk seal is protected under various national and international laws, including the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals and the Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats. Several conservation organizations are also working to protect the species, including the Mediterranean Monk Seal Conservation Society and the Hellenic Society for the Study and Protection of the Monk Seal.

References:
ChatGPT. (10 Apr 2023). Tel me about the Mediterranean Monk seal, with references, please. [Response to a user question]. OpenAI.
The Monk seal was once abundant around the Greek coast and used to breed on the beaches but evolved a change of habit due to persecution by humans who saw it as competition for fish. It now breeds in sea caves and tends to stay in them when not in the sea.

The Greek poet, Homer, mentioned what is probably the monk seal in his Odyssey:
Homer, the ancient Greek poet, mentioned the Mediterranean monk seal in his epic poem, the Odyssey. In Book 4, lines 345-347, he describes the sea-monsters that inhabit the waters around the island of Pharos:

…and the great seal (phoke) was in attendance upon her from the bottom of the sea, even the seal that was wont to come forth last from his lair to bask upon the shore.


In this passage, the Greek word "phoke" is used to refer to the seal, which is believed to be the Mediterranean monk seal. It is interesting to note that the word "phoke" is also the origin of the English word "phocid," which refers to the family of true seals that includes the Mediterranean monk seal. It is worth noting that the Odyssey was written in the 8th century BCE, long before the Mediterranean monk seal became endangered. At the time, the species was likely abundant and well-known to the ancient Greeks.
It is a sign of cultural evolution that humans are now more inclined to protect endangered species than to persecute them, consequently, the monk seal population has rebounded, and they are now present in Croatia and Albania from where they had disappeared. When a female monk seal, nicknamed Argyro, who became so familiar with humans on the island of Samos that she would lounge in beach chairs and hang out in a cafe, was shot, it caused an outrage throughout Greece. In earlier times, Greek fishermen would boast that they had killed a monk seal as this was considered a good thing to do.

This cultural evolution in humans, where the primitive notion that a god had given all the animals on Earth to humankind to use or abuse as they wished, to one where we realise we all share this one planet and depend on maximising biodiversity if we are all to survive, has allowed the monk seal to reverse its cultural evolution and once again start to come out of the sea caves and appear in numbers on beaches. This is another example of how Humanism is replacing the old, harmful religious superstitions as human ethical evolution rids itself of the regressive influence of religion.

Long may this Humanist trend continue.

Thank you for sharing!






submit to reddit

Tuesday, 4 April 2023

Superstition News - Why Do People Fall For Wackadoodle Ideas?

Superstition News
Why Do People Fall For Wackadoodle Ideas?

Supernatural beliefs have featured in every society throughout history. New research helps explain why

Jesus and Mo cartoon in which they discuss the loss of gaps to occupy
It seem the 'God of the gaps' explanation carries a great deal of weight, especially as an explanation for natural phenomenon such as disease, drought, floods, earthquakes, etc., in smaller societies. Only as societies get larger are these supernatural explanation used to explain man-made disasters such as war, theft, mass murders, etc.

It's also true that, while developed societies such as the USA tend to look for supernatural explanations for man-made disasters, they also, with better education tend to look to science to explain natural phenomena and less so to imaginary supernatural causes.

The result is that the search for gaps in which to sit their god becomes an obsession of those who benefit from people's superstition, such as fundamentalist televangelists and Creation cult leaders, who continually attack science looking to find gaps, either real or imaginary in which to sit their ever-shrinking god and keep the income stream flowing.

Cartoon in which the God of the Gaps is thankful for Creationists
Quite why there should be a difference between larger and smaller societies is discussed in an article by Dr. Joshua Conrad Jackson, postdoctoral fellow, Kellogg School of Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA and Professor Brock Bastian, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia.

The article is reprinted here under a Creative Commons license, reformatted for stylistic consistency. The original can be read here.
Web Analytics