Creationism in Crisis
How African Megafauna Shaped Human Evolution
How African Megafauna Shaped Human Evolution
Peter Bischoff/Getty Images
Homo Erectus
A reconstruction of a Homo erectus female (based on fossil ER 3733) by paleoartist John Gurche, part of the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History’s Human Origins Program.
Childish Creationist superstition dictates that cult members believe humans were magically created without ancestors somewhere in the Middle East and that we have spread from there, following a genocidal flood a few thousand years ago.
It must be galling for them to learn then that the archaeological evidence is that we evolved over millions of years in Africa from a common ancestor of the chimpanzees and the Gorilla out of a genus of hominins known as the Australopithecines, anatomically intermediate between our last common ancestor with chimpanzees and archaic hominins such as Homo habilis and Homo erectus.
And yet the evidence is that much of what we are today is the result of our co-existence with the African megafauna of the time.
I have often made the point in these blog posts that if you want to understand why we are as we are today, think, 'East African plains'. It was there that we evolved from a clever ape to a tool-making, intelligent hominin, ready to take on the rest of the globe and exploit what it had to offer.
How the African environment, and in particular the presence of large herbivores, contributed to the evolution is the subject of an article in The Conversation by the author and academic, Professor Norman Owen-Smith, emeritus research professor of African Ecology, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa. His article is reprinted here under a Creative Commons licence. The article has been reformatted for stylistic consistency. The original can be read here.
Large mammals shaped the evolution of humans: here’s why it happened in Africa
Norman Owen-Smith, University of the Witwatersrand That humans originated in Africa is widely accepted. But it’s not generally recognised how unique features of Africa’s ecology were responsible for the crucial evolutionary transitions from forest-inhabiting fruit-eater to savanna-dwelling hunter. These were founded on earth movements and aided physically by Africa’s seasonal aridity, bedrock-derived soils and absence of barriers to movements between north and south.
These features promoted extensive savanna grasslands marked by erratic rainfall, regular fires and abundant numbers of diverse grazing and browsing animals.
My lifelong studies have focused on the ecology of Africa’s large herbivores and their effects on savanna vegetation. In my recent book, by linking pre-existing threads together for the first time, I explain how distinctive features of these animals’ ecology, founded on Africa’s physical geography, enabled the adaptive changes that led ultimately to modern humans.
What emerges is the realisation that this amazing evolutionary transformation could only have occurred in Africa. This recognition emphasises the deep cultural legacy formed by Africa’s large mammal heritage for all of humankind.
Ape-men
Starting during the late Miocene, around 10 million years ago, a plume of molten magma, hot liquid material from deep inside the Earth, pushed eastern parts of Africa upward. This led to rifting of the Earth’s crust, volcanic eruptions and soils enriched in mineral nutrients from the lava and ash. Grassy savannas spread and animals adapted increasingly to graze this vegetation component. Apes from that time were forced to spend less time up in trees and more time walking upright on two legs.
Progressive reductions in rainfall, restricting plant growth and worsening dry season aridity, forced the early ape-men, (Australopithecines), to change their diet. They went from eating mainly fruits from forest trees to consuming underground bulbs and tubers found between the widely spaced trees. These were tough to extract and chew.
This led to the emergence through evolution of the genus Paranthropus (colloquially “nutcracker man”), characterised by huge jaws and teeth. By about a million years ago they were gone. Apparently, the effort of extracting and processing these well-defended plant parts became too formidable.
Homo habilis
Around 2.8 million years ago, another lineage split off from the australopithecines, reversing the trend towards robust dentition. This lineage used stones chipped to serve as tools. These were used to scrape flesh from carcasses of animals killed by carnivores, and crack open long bones for their marrow content. This transition in ecology was sufficiently momentous to warrant a new generic name: Homo, specifically habilis (“handy-man”).
These first humans thus became scavengers on animal left-overs. They most probably exploited a time window around midday when the killers – mainly sabre-tooth cats – were resting, before hyenas arrived nocturnally to devour the leftovers. Walking upright freed their arms to carry bones away to be processed in safe sites to augment the plant-based dietary staples.
To facilitate such midday movements, Homo habilis lost its body hair; this made it possible for them to be active under conditions when fur-covered animals would soon over-heat.
Homo erectus
Several hundred thousand years of progressive advancements in upright walking and brain capacity led to the next major adaptive shift, exemplified by improvements in the design of stone tools. Stone cores became shaped on both sides to aid the processing of animal carcasses.
This led to the emergence of Homo erectus around 1.8 million years ago. These early humans had become efficient hunters. Consequently, meat and bones became reliable food resources year-round.
A division of labour came about. Men hunted; women gathered plant parts. This required a home base and more elaborate forms of communication about planned excursions, laying the foundations for language.
Homo sapiens
After 800,000 years ago, fluctuations in heat and aridity became more extreme in Africa. Finely crafted stone tools defined the transition into the Middle Stone Age, coupled with the emergence of modern Homo sapiens in Africa around 300 thousand years ago.
But despite its hunting prowess Homo sapiens had declined to precarious numbers in Africa by around 130,000 years ago, following an especially severe ice age. Genetic evidence indicates that the entire human population across the continent shrank to fewer than 40,000 individuals, spread thinly from Morocco in the north to the Cape in the far south.
One remnant survived by inhabiting caves along the southern Cape coast, exploiting marine resources. This reliable food source fostered further advances in tool technology, and even the earliest art.
The use of bows and arrows as weapons, along with spears, probably contributed crucially to the expansion of humans beyond Africa around 60,000 years ago. They spread onward through Asia and into Europe, displacing the Neanderthals.
Only in Africa
Wildebeest grazing on the Serengeti Plains in Tanzania.
Source: Norman Owen-Smith
Africa’s high-lying interior plateau generated the seasonal dryness that restricted plant growth through its eastern and southern regions. Widespread volcanically derived soils were sufficiently fertile to foster the spread of medium-large grazers adapted to digest dry grass efficiently.
These especially abundant herbivores crowded around remaining waterholes, providing sufficient remnants of flesh and marrow to make scavenging a reliable means to overcome shortages of edible plant parts during the dry season. The increased dependence on meat to supplement a plant-based diet led to social coordination between male hunters and female gatherers, which in turn promoted advances in communication and tool technology supported by expanding cranial capacity.
If Africa had remained largely low-lying and leached of nutrients like most of South America and Australia, this would not have been possible.
Africa’s mobile grazers, such as wildebeest, are currently being squeezed out of their sanctuaries by expanding human settlements. These animals represent a global cultural heritage, having being pivotal to our evolutionary origins. We must ensure that sufficient space remains in Africa to enable their persistence despite burgeoning human populations.
Norman Owen-Smith, Emeritus Research Professor of African Ecology, University of the Witwatersrand
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
"fewer than 40,000 individuals" - Please explain why genetic data is more convincingly explained by a a population bottleneck, than by a mutation that conferred an extremely fitness-enhancing cognitive/language improvement. The latter could have caused an explosive population replacement from a point origin. Bear in mind that a naive anthropologist from Mars could use central Asian Y chromosome data to postulate a population bottleneck in 13th century central Asia.
ReplyDeleteWhy would I need to explain that, please? BTW, I would hope a martian anthropologist would be slightly more sophisticated in his/her thinking than that and would appreciate why these clusters occur. If you don't know, go to the search box above aand search for Genghi Khan.
DeleteI had thought that you would appreciate that the naive anthropologist reflexively assuming a population bottleneck (and never discovering the enormous harems of the Mongol elite) was a metaphor for actual population biologists reflexively assuming a population bottleneck, rather than considering other explanations. One of the many climate fluctuations that occurred during the quaternary is not a convincing reason for a near-extinction event of a species that ranged over 70 degrees of latitude. It therefore does not add credibility to that explanation.
DeleteWho said anything about climate, please? These Y chromsome clusters occur for reasons other than genetic fitness. The usual reason is that a powerful male had several powerful sons and so were able to procreate with many more females than the average male. Three notable examples are Genghis Khan, Niall Noígíallach in Ireland (legendary founder of the Uig Niall (O'Neil) Clan and one associated with a Chinese emperor, Giocangga. All of these are of course examples of gene-meme co-evolution in which the culturl aspect was the most significant component. No genetic bottle-necks were involved.
DeleteGenghis Khan And Gene-Meme Co-Evolution