Tuesday, 27 January 2026

Malevolent Design - The Brain-Eating Amoeba is Coming To A Pond Near You!


Invisible but deadly: Scientists warn of a growing global threat from amoebae in water and the environment | EurekAlert!

In a recent paper published in Biocontaminant, a group of environmental and public health scientists from China and the United States warn of the growing threat to public health from a group of dangerous free-living single-celled amoebae, the most notorious of which is Naegleria fowleri, also known as the brain-eating amoeba.

This complex, eukaryotic organism bears all the hallmarks of what Discovery Institute fellows William A. Dembski and Michael J. Behe insist is compelling evidence for intelligent design — complex specified genetic information and irreducible complexity — so, if we accept their argument, we have to conclude that whatever designer they imagine is doing this designing must also be the one who designed these nasty little ways to make people sick and die by having their brains eaten, like in some grotesque zombie apocalypse.

This pathogenic amoeba is not new — I wrote about it in The Malevolent Designer: Why Nature’s God is not Good, page 33, based on a blog post I originally wrote in 2015. Since then, assisted by global warming, ageing water-supply infrastructure, and a lack of effective monitoring, the amoeba has become a global threat to public health.

N. fowleri normally lives in soil and water, where it feeds on bacteria and other micro-organisms, but if it manages to get into a victim’s nose it can track along the olfactory nerves to the brain, where it treats brain cells the way it treats soil-borne organisms and sets about eating them. Infections are almost invariably fatal. What makes them particularly dangerous is their ability to survive extreme conditions that would kill most micro-organisms, such as high temperatures and strong disinfectants like chlorine, so they can persist in water supplies that most people regard as safe.

An additional hazard is that these amoebae can also act as carriers for other pathogens such as Legionella pneumophila, Chlamydia, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. By providing these pathogens with protection from disinfection, the amoeba can enhance their pathogenicity and prolong their survival in the environment.

It would be hard to find a better example than N. fowleri of what creationists insist must be intelligently designed, so it follows that there are probably few better examples of the sheer malevolent evil of any designer of such creatures, from the perspective of the humans infected with it. For creationists to retreat into the traditional excuse of blaming ‘the Fall’ is to abandon the claim that irreducible complexity and complex specified genetic information are definitive evidence of intelligent design, and to retreat instead into religious fundamentalism and Bible literalism.

Naegleria fowleri^ Evolution, Distribution, and Spread. Naegleria fowleri is a free-living, thermophilic amoeba that evolved as a bacterial predator in warm freshwater and soil, not as a human parasite. It belongs to the genus Naegleria, an ancient lineage of eukaryotes that likely diverged hundreds of millions of years ago. Its ability to destroy human brain tissue is an accidental by-product of enzymes and feeding mechanisms that evolved to digest microbial prey; humans are an evolutionary dead end for the organism.

Historically, N. fowleri was confined mainly to warm freshwater environments in tropical and subtropical regions, with most reported cases in the southern United States, Australia, parts of Africa, India, and South America. Infections were rare and geographically clustered around warm lakes, rivers, and hot springs.

Over the last few decades, its range has expanded. Cases have appeared progressively further north in the United States and sporadically in parts of Europe and Asia. This shift is strongly associated with rising water temperatures driven by climate change, longer and more intense heatwaves, ageing water infrastructure, and increased human exposure through recreational water use and inadequately disinfected domestic water systems. Improved molecular detection has also increased recognition of its presence. Together, these trends indicate a real and growing public-health risk from a pathogen whose ecology is being reshaped by environmental change.



Why this matters for Intelligent Design claims

From an evolutionary perspective, N. fowleri is exactly what one would expect:
  • A free-living microorganism adapted to warm freshwater
  • With feeding mechanisms that become lethally destructive when misapplied to human tissue
  • Whose spread tracks environmental change, infrastructure decay, and climate warming

From an Intelligent Design perspective, however, it is a spectacularly awkward example:
  • It shows “irreducible complexity” and intricate molecular machinery.
  • It serves no conceivable human benefit.
  • It causes an appalling, rapidly fatal disease.
  • It is becoming more prevalent as environmental conditions change.

In other words, it looks precisely like a contingent evolutionary product of natural selection and ecological drift — not like the handiwork of a benevolent or even minimally competent designer.
The warning from the environment and public health scientists is also spelled out in a news release from Biochar Editorial Office, Shenyang Agricultural University, made available through EurekAlert!.

Invisible but deadly: Scientists warn of a growing global threat from amoebae in water and the environment
A group of environmental and public health scientists is sounding the alarm on a largely overlooked but increasingly dangerous group of pathogens: free living amoebae. In a new perspective article published in Biocontaminant, the researchers highlight how these microscopic organisms are becoming a growing global public health threat, fueled by climate change, aging water infrastructure, and gaps in monitoring and detection.
Amoebae are single celled organisms commonly found in soil and water. While most are harmless, some species can cause devastating infections. Among the most notorious is Naegleria fowleri, often referred to as the brain eating amoeba, which can trigger a rare but almost always fatal brain infection after contaminated water enters the nose during activities such as swimming.

What makes these organisms particularly dangerous is their ability to survive conditions that kill many other microbes. They can tolerate high temperatures, strong disinfectants like chlorine, and even live inside water distribution systems that people assume are safe.

Longfei Shu, corresponding author
School of Environmental Science and Engineering,
State Key Laboratory for Biocontrol,
Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

The authors also emphasize that amoebae act as hidden carriers for other harmful microbes. By sheltering bacteria and viruses inside their cells, amoebae can protect these pathogens from disinfection and help them persist and spread in drinking water systems. This so called Trojan horse effect may also contribute to the spread of antibiotic resistance.

Climate warming is expected to worsen the problem by expanding the geographic range of heat loving amoebae into regions where they were previously rare. Recent outbreaks linked to recreational water use have already raised public concern in several countries.

The researchers call for a coordinated One Health approach that connects human health, environmental science, and water management. They urge stronger surveillance, improved diagnostic tools, and the adoption of advanced water treatment technologies to reduce risks before infections occur.

Amoebae are not just a medical issue or an environmental issue. They sit at the intersection of both, and addressing them requires integrated solutions that protect public health at its source.

Longfei Shu.


Publication:
Zheng J, Hu R, Shi Y, He Z, Shu L. 2025.
The rising threat of amoebae: a global public health challenge. Biocontaminant 1: e015 doi: 10.48130/biocontam-0025-0019


Highlights
  • Amoebae are emerging pathogens of significant public health concern.
  • Amoebae can serve as vectors for various biocontaminants, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, and resistance genes.
  • Climate and environmental changes are amplifying human exposure to and infection by pathogenic amoebae.
  • A One Health approach is crucial for mitigating amoeba-related risks effectively.

Abstract
Amoebae, single-celled protists capable of altering their shape and moving via pseudopodia, represent a growing public health threat worldwide. Free-living species such as Naegleria fowleri and Acanthamoeba spp. are of particular concern. Although often overlooked in conventional biosecurity research, these protozoa can survive extreme environmental conditions, including high pH, elevated temperatures, and high chlorine concentrations, making them resistant to standard water treatment approaches. Their widespread presence in both natural and engineered environments poses significant exposure risks through contaminated water sources, recreational water activities, and drinking water systems. While conventional disinfection methods show limited efficacy, emerging technologies and materials, such as novel chemical systems and piezo-catalytic composites, offer promising avenues for reducing amoeba viability. Nevertheless, a significant gap persists in the early detection and monitoring of these pathogens. Future research should prioritize the development of integrated strategies under the One Health framework, linking human health with environmental and ecological dimensions, while advancing innovative vector control measures to limit transmission. Given the rising global incidence of amoeba-related diseases, there is an urgent need for more proactive public health surveillance and intervention efforts. Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract

Zheng J, Hu R, Shi Y, He Z, Shu L. 2025.
The rising threat of amoebae: a global public health challenge. Biocontaminant 1: e015 doi: 10.48130/biocontam-0025-0019

Copyright: © 2025 The authors.
Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA, USA. Open access.
Reprinted under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0)
For creationists and intelligent-design advocates, Naegleria fowleri is an awkward little organism to explain away. It displays precisely the kind of biochemical sophistication, coordinated molecular machinery, and environmental resilience that William Dembski and Michael Behe insist can only be the product of an intelligent designer. And yet what this “design” actually delivers is a creature that accidentally invades human brains and eats them, with a fatality rate approaching 100%. If this is the handiwork of a designer, then it is not merely incompetent, but grotesquely malevolent.

The evolutionary explanation, by contrast, fits the facts effortlessly. N. fowleri is a free-living amoeba adapted to warm freshwater environments, equipped with enzymes and feeding mechanisms that evolved to digest bacteria and other microorganisms. That these same mechanisms become lethally destructive when misapplied to human neural tissue is exactly what one would expect from a blind, contingent evolutionary process. Humans are an accidental host, an evolutionary dead end for the organism, and its increasing prevalence tracks environmental change, climate warming, ageing infrastructure, and altered patterns of human exposure — not the intentions of any supernatural agent.

As so often, the evidence stubbornly refuses to cooperate with creationist dogma. Faced with examples like N. fowleri, creationists can either abandon their claims that irreducible complexity and complex specified information are reliable indicators of intelligent design, or retreat into the theological get-out clause of blaming “the Fall”, so exposing the fact that ID is Bible-literalism dressed in a lab coat. Either way, the scientific reality remains the same: this is exactly the kind of organism evolution predicts, and exactly the kind of organism a benevolent or competent designer would not.


Advertisement

Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon


Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon


Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon

All titles available in paperback, hardcover, ebook for Kindle and audio format.

Prices correct at time of publication. for current prices.

Advertisement


Thank you for sharing!






Monday, 26 January 2026

Refuting Creationism - The Unintelligently Designed Ancestral Potato and How Humans Improved It

S. jamesii tubers in a ceremonial basket.
Credit: Alastair Bístoí

S. jamseii flowers
Credit: Tim Lee/NHMU
This wild potato may change the agricultural story in the American Southwest – @theU

Anthropologists at the University of Utah and the Natural History Museum of Utah have traced the anthropogenic spread and cultivation of a relative of the potato, Solanum jamesii (the Four Corners potato). Their findings are published in PLOS ONE. This plant has been a culinary, medicinally and culturally important food crop across the Colorado Plateau for millennia.

Until now, despite its long history, the extent to which indigenous people domesticated S. jamesii has been unknown. Genetic evidence has shown that it had been transported and cultivated far from its natural range and had acquired frost resistance, longer dormancy and sprouting resilience, all of which made it more suitable for cultivation in its anthropogenic range. The Utah team have now shown how it arrived on the Colorado Plateau from its origins in the south-west USA, probably through a trading network.

A problem which I have found impossible to get a creationist to address without them running for the bolt-hole of ‘mysterious ways’ is the fact that, with only a very few exceptions, every domesticated animal and cultivated plant has been considerably improved on the wild stock and is always the result of a human-mediated evolutionary process. The result is often almost unrecognisable as the same species as their wild ancestor.

Yet according to the Bible, all animals and plants were created for the sole benefit of humankind by a supposedly omnipotent, omniscient god. Had that been so, we could expect them to have been created fit for purpose and perfectly suited to the uses to which we put them. The fact that we have had to adapt them and change them so drastically to make them fit for purpose gives the lie to claims of intelligent design by an omniscient designer.

This relative of the potato therefore serves as an illustration of how humans, unwittingly or otherwise, have modified and changed the distribution of cultivated plants by inadvertently mimicking the process of evolution — mutation → selection → reproduction. S. jamesii is native to the Mogollon Rim, a region spanning south-central Arizona and into the Mogollon Mountains of New Mexico. The researchers were able to build a picture of how this plant was transported from there to the Four Corners region of southern Utah, south-west Colorado and north-west New Mexico by extracting the characteristic starch granules embedded in the stone tools used to process the tubers, recovered from 14 archaeological sites within and beyond the tuber’s natural range.

This research adds to the growing body of evidence that indigenous people in the south-western USA actively cultivated crops of their own and did not just acquire them from other peoples. It had previously been believed that they relied primarily on crops domesticated in Mesoamerica, such as maize, beans or squash. It also adds another species to the long list of plants and animals that have had to be modified from their wild type, and for which creationists are at a loss to explain why their supposed omniscient designer god did not do a very good job of it to begin with.

Sunday, 25 January 2026

Creationism Refuted - You Can Tell The Ignorance Of The Bible's Authors By What They Left Out


Top: The GLEAM/GLEAM-X view of the Milky Way galaxy. Credit: S. Mantovanini & the GLEAM-X team
Bottom: The same area of the Milky Way in visible light.
Credit: Axel Mellinger, milkywaysky.com
A new, expansive view of the Milky Way reveals our Galaxy in unprecedented radio colour - ICRAR

A paper published yesterday in Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia presents a stunning new view of the Milky Way galaxy. It was produced by astronomers from the International Centre of Radio Astronomy Research (ICRAR) and shows the Milky Way in low-frequency colour images. It is a useful reminder of the stark difference between the Bible’s description of the universe and the real thing.

The Bronze Age authors of the Bible could only write about what they knew — and, manifestly, that wasn’t very much — but then they could never have guessed that some charlatan at some point in the future was going to put their childish tales into a book and declare it to be the word of a creator god. If anything was ever destined to be a self-falsifying claim, it was that.

But if it had been the word of an omnibenevolent supernatural deity with a vital message for humankind, not only would it have been so perfectly written that it could not possibly be misunderstood or misinterpreted, it would also have contained information not then available to its scribes, so there could be no doubt about its authenticity.

Yet there is nothing in the Bible that was not already known in the Bronze Age, and a great deal of what was believed in those days which has since turned out to be badly wrong. In fact, it is true to say that if the Bible were discovered today for the first time, any competent historian could date it and probably place its authorship geographically by the scientific ignorance it contains.

For example, there is nothing about micro-organisms, atoms, electricity, plate tectonics, galaxies, the vastness of space, or the fact that some of those little points of light the authors thought were stuck to a dome over the small, flat Earth were actually galaxies containing half a trillion or more suns. Nothing. Not a single thing that we could point to and say, “Wow! Only a creator god could have known that in the Bronze Age!” Instead, we have a god who supposedly designed and created the human body but believes we think with our hearts and that a clone made from a man will produce a woman.

Imagine if the first chapter of Genesis had been written like Eric Idle’s Galaxy Song from Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life:

Saturday, 24 January 2026

Creationism Refuted - Messages From Nearly 70,000 Years Ago.


A rocky surface with hand stencils surrounded by red pigment, fingers narrow.
A man in a dark cave using a special flashlight to reveal finger marks on a rocky wall.
Adhi Agus Oktaviana illuminating a hand stencil.

Max Aubert
Humanity’s oldest known cave art has been discovered in Sulawesi.

There's nothing quite like leaving a message behind to tell future generations that you were here.

Creationists, of course, have a message from about 5,000 years ago telling them that there were ignorant Bronze Age storytellers living in the Middle East — but sadly the only truth in their stories was the one they didn’t explicitly state: that they were making things up to explain what they didn’t know, which meant a great many stories to invent. They couldn’t have guessed, of course, that their tales would later be written down, bound up in a book, and then proclaimed to be the inerrant word of a creator god; otherwise they might have made more of an effort to get it right, or at least admitted they didn’t know. As it is, all we really learn from them is just how ignorant they were, and how vivid their imaginations must have been.

To be fair, it may not have been their intention to mislead and misinform, but that has been the result — mostly, it has to be said, through the fault of those who later declared their tales to be the authentic word of a god, because that conveniently suited their political agenda.

People living much earlier, on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi, left a much clearer and more honest message in the form of cave art, and particularly hand stencils. All they really say is, “Hi there! I was here!” — with no attempt to elevate themselves to a special status or claim to know things they didn’t know. Where they depicted the animals around them, they showed them just as they saw them: wild and free.

This cave art, which precedes the celebrated art of the French and Spanish caves by tens of thousands of years, has now been identified as the oldest known cave art, telling an unambiguous story of people living there around 70,000 years ago — long before anatomically modern humans made their presence felt in Western Eurasia. The discovery and the methods used to date the art were published in Nature, in a paper that marks a defining moment in our understanding of early symbolic behaviour.

Four of the researchers — Maxime Aubert, Professor of Archaeological Science, Griffith University; Adam Brumm, Professor of Archaeology, Griffith University; Adhi Oktaviana, Research Centre of Archeometry, Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN), Jakarta, Indonesia; and Renaud Joannes-Boyau, Professor of Geochronology and Geochemistry, Southern Cross University, New South Wales, Australia — have also written an article in The Conversation that explains the significance of the find in accessible terms. Their piece is reprinted here under a Creative Commons licence, reformatted for stylistic consistency:

Refuting Creationism - Adding A Little Bit More To The Human Evolutionary Story

Top: Multiple views of MLP-3000-1, the newly discovered Paranthropus partial left mandible and molar crown. Bottom: MLP-3000-1 in side-by-side comparison with mandible fossils from other species — Australopithecus afarensis (A.L. 266-1), Paranthropus aethiopicus (OMO-57/4-1968-41 and OMO-18-1967-18), and early Homo (LD 350-1).
Alemseged Research Group

Two fragments of the newly discovered mandible specimen in the location they were originally found.
Alemseged Research Group.

New 2.6-million-year-old Paranthropus fossil reshapes understanding of early hominins | Biological Sciences Division | The University of Chicago

Research published two days ago in Nature by a team led by University of Chicago paleoanthropologist Professor Zeresenay Alemseged will dismay and delight creationists in about equal measure — especially those who manage to rationalise a fossil dating from about 2.6 million years before they believe Earth and everything on it was created — because it shows that scientists were wrong about something.

It is the news that the jawbone of an archaic hominin, Paranthropus, has been found in Ethiopia some 200 miles further north than the previously believed northern limit of these hominins.

Normally, to a binary-thinking creationist, science being wrong about even the most minor and unimportant detail is “proof” that science is wrong about everything. This childish belief probably stems from them having a single source-book which has been deemed to be inerrant, so even the slightest falsehood in it renders that claim untenable. They assume it is the same with science: that what scientists believe comes from supposedly inerrant textbooks written by “prophets” such as Charles Darwin, serving as the source-books from which all scientists get their information. So, if scientists are ever wrong, all the books from the science libraries of the world can be thrown in the waste bin, leaving creationism’s book of “inerrant” origin myths as the winner.

What they find hard to comprehend, apparently, is that scientific knowledge is cumulative, with current thinking always provisional, pending further confirmation or in need of revision in the light of new information, and that facts are neutral in any dispute, so can be objective referees. They fail to realise that because science works this way, scientists from all over the world will eventually converge on a single answer. Religions, by contrast, because they are not based on evidence but on the tenuous thread of interpretation of an ancient book which itself presents no evidence for its claims, continue to diversify into ever smaller sects, each claiming to have the one true answer but having no evidence to referee the dispute.

But of course, in the best scientific tradition, this jawbone simply adds richness to the hominin evolutionary story and raises the possibility that Paranthropus, like Australopithecus and Homo, was present in the Afar region of Ethiopia. And that opens up the intriguing possibility — given the propensity of hominins to diverge and then hybridise — that modern Homo sapiens could have some Paranthropus ancestry.

Paranthropus^ the “robust” hominins. Paranthropus is an extinct genus of hominins that lived in eastern and southern Africa between about 2.7 and 1.2 million years ago. It is best known for its so-called “robust” anatomy — not in the sense of being especially large or powerful overall, but because of its massively built jaws, large molar teeth, thick enamel, and prominent cheekbones. Many species also had a sagittal crest (a ridge along the top of the skull) for the attachment of powerful chewing muscles.

Three species are widely recognised:
  • Paranthropus aethiopicus (East Africa, ~2.7–2.3 Ma)
  • Paranthropus boisei (East Africa, ~2.3–1.2 Ma)
  • Paranthropus robustus (South Africa, ~2.0–1.2 Ma)

These hominins were specialised for processing tough, fibrous, or gritty foods such as roots, tubers, sedges, and possibly hard seeds. Stable-isotope and microwear studies show that different species exploited different diets, but all appear adapted for heavy chewing.

Despite their imposing jaws, Paranthropus species had relatively small brains (roughly 400–550 cm³), similar to or only slightly larger than those of Australopithecus.



Where Paranthropus sits in the hominin family tree

Paranthropus is generally regarded as a specialised side-branch of the hominin lineage rather than a direct ancestor of modern humans. Most palaeoanthropologists think it diverged from an australopithecine-like ancestor sometime after about 3 million years ago, around the same time that the genus Homo was emerging.

In simplified terms:
  • An australopithecine ancestor gave rise to at least two major lineages:
    • one leading to Homo (eventually Homo sapiens),
    • another leading to the robust, chewing-adapted Paranthropus.

This makes Paranthropus a cousin lineage rather than a direct ancestor of modern humans.

However, the family tree is not a neat, branching diagram. The early hominin record shows multiple contemporaneous species living side by side, sometimes in the same regions. Genetic evidence from later hominins (such as Neanderthals and Denisovans) shows that hybridisation between hominin lineages did occur. Although no ancient DNA has yet been recovered from Paranthropus fossils, the possibility that early hominin species occasionally interbred cannot be ruled out.

Why Paranthropus matters

The existence of Paranthropus shows that human evolution was not a straight line from “ape” to “human”, but a bushy, experimental process with multiple lineages trying different ecological strategies. While the robust hominins ultimately went extinct, they represent a successful and long-lived adaptation that coexisted with early members of the genus Homo for over a million years.

Their story underlines a central point of evolutionary biology: most evolutionary experiments fail — not because they were “badly designed”, but because changing environments favour some adaptations over others.
The discovery of the jawbone and what it means for our understanding of the history of the hominins is explained in a University of Chicago news item:
New 2.6-million-year-old Paranthropus fossil reshapes understanding of early hominins
A partial lower jaw discovered in Afar, Ethiopia expands the known geographic distribution of Paranthropus northward by 1000 km, revealing the genus to be more widespread and adaptively versatile than previously thought.
In a new paper published in Nature, a team led by University of Chicago paleoanthropologist Professor Zeresenay Alemseged reports the discovery of the first Paranthropus specimen from the Afar region of Ethiopia, 1000 km north of the genus’ previous northernmost occurrence. This finding offers significant new information about when and where Paranthropus existed, its adaptation to diverse environmental conditions, and how it may have interacted with other ancient relatives of modern humans including our genus Homo.

If we are to understand our own evolutionary trajectory as a genus and species, we need to understand the environmental, ecological, and competitive factors that shaped our evolution. This discovery is so much more than a simple snapshot of Paranthropus’ occurrence: It sheds fresh light on the driving forces behind the evolution of the genus.

Professor Zeresenay Alemseged, lead author
Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy
University of Chicago
Chicago, IL, USA.

Alemseged sifts through unidentified fossil fragments in the field to find parts of a Paranthropus specimen.

Alemseged Research Group.

Paranthropus previously “missing” among hominins in the Afar and northeast Africa.


Since the human and chimpanzee lineages diverged around 7 million years ago, human ancestors went through a dramatic evolutionary process that ultimately led to the emergence of Homo sapiens around 300,000 years ago.

We strive to understand who we are and how we became to be human, and that has implications for how we behave and how we are going to impact the environment around us, and how that, in turn, is going to impact us.

Professor Zeresenay Alemseged.

In the fossil record, the human lineage is represented by over 15 hominin species that generally fit into four groups:



  1. Facultative bipeds, e.g. Ardipithecus — Occasionally bipedal but mostly living in trees and walking on all four limbs.
  2. Habitual bipeds: Australopithecus — Retained arboreality to some degree but mostly practiced upright walking and experimented with stone tools.
  3. Obligate bipeds: Homo— The genus to which modern humans belong, characterized by a larger brain, sophisticated tools and obligate bipedalism.
  4. Robust hominins: Paranthropus (also known as robust australopithecines) — Habitually bipedal like Australopithecus but distinguished by extremely large molars capped by thick enamel and facial and muscular configurations that suggest a powerful chewing apparatus.

Hundreds of fossils representing over a dozen species of Ardipithecus, Australopithecus, and Homo had been found in the Afar region of northern Ethiopia, so the apparent absence of Paranthropus was conspicuous and puzzling to paleoanthropologists, many of whom had concluded the genus simply never ventured that far north. While some experts suggested that dietary specialization restricted Paranthropus to southern regions, others hypothesized that this could have been the result of Paranthropus’ inability to compete with the more versatile Homo, [however] neither was the case: Paranthropus was as widespread and versatile as Homo and the new find shows that its absence in the Afar was an artifact of the fossil record.

Professor Zeresenay Alemseged.

Professor Zeresenay Alemseged demonstrates how fragments of the newly discovered mandible specimen fit together.

Alemseged Research Group.

Rethinking hominin biogeography, adaptation, and competition.

The 2.6-million-year-old partial jaw reported in Nature comes from the Mille-Logya research area in the Afar and is one of the oldest Paranthropus specimens unearthed to date. After recovering as many fragments as possible from the field site, the team brought them back to Chicago to analyze internal anatomy and morphology with powerful micro-CT scanning.

It’s a remarkable nexus: an ultra-modern technology being applied to a 2.6-million-year-old fossil to tell a story that is common to us all.

Professor Zeresenay Alemseged.

This new find shows that Paranthropus was as widespread and versatile as Homo and was not necessarily outcompeted by Homo.

Paranthropus was previously nicknamed the “nutcracker” genus, highlighting the very large molars, thick enamel, and heavy jaws and reflecting assumptions that this chewing apparatus caused Paranthropus to occupy a highly specialized and narrower dietary niche. But the new Paranthropus from Afar reveals that starting from its earliest origins, Paranthropus was widespread, versatile, and able to crack more than just nuts.

The new discovery gives us insight into the competitive edges that each group had, the type of diet they were consuming, the type of muscular and skeletal adaptations that they had, whether they were using stone tools or not — all parts of their adaptation and behavior that we are trying to figure out. Discoveries like this really trigger interesting questions in terms of reviewing, revising, and then coming up with new hypotheses as to what the key differences were between the main hominin groups.

Professor Zeresenay Alemseged.

Two fragments of the newly discovered mandible specimen in the location they were originally found.

Alemseged Research Group.

Publication:


Abstract
The Afar depression in northeastern Ethiopia contains a rich palaeontological and archaeological record, which documents 6 million years of human evolution. Abundant faunal evidence links evolutionary patterns with palaeoenvironmental change as a principal underlying force1. Many of the earlier hominin taxa recognized today are found in the Afar, but Paranthropus has been conspicuously absent from the region. Here we report on the discovery, in the Mille-Logya research area, of a partial mandible that we attribute to Paranthropus, dated to between 2.5 and 2.9 million years ago and found in a well-understood chronological and faunal context. The find is among the oldest fossils attributable to Paranthropus and indicates that this genus, from its earliest known appearance, had a greater geographic distribution than previously documented2. Often seen as a dietary specialist feeding on tough food, the range of diverse habitats with which eastern African Paranthropus can now be associated shows that this suggested adaptive niche did not restrict its ability to disperse as widely as species of Australopithecus and early Homo. The discovery of Paranthropus in the Afar emphasizes how little is known about hominin evolution in eastern Africa during the crucial period between 3 and 2.5 million years ago, when this genus and the Homo lineage presumably emerged.

For creationists, then, this discovery is a double embarrassment. On the one hand, it further extends the fossil record of hominins into yet another inconvenient corner of deep time and geography, while on the other it neatly illustrates how science actually works: hypotheses are refined, boundaries are adjusted, and understanding improves as new evidence comes in. What it does *not* do is undermine the entire enterprise of palaeoanthropology or cast doubt on the reality of human evolution, despite the fevered hopes of those who imagine that any minor correction is a fatal blow to all of science.

Notably, the authors themselves show no difficulty whatsoever in fitting this new find into an evolutionary framework. There is no hand-wringing, no talk of “crisis” or “collapse” of evolutionary theory, and no appeal to supernatural intervention to plug a supposed gap. Instead, the jawbone is treated exactly as it should be: as a new data point that enriches our picture of early hominin diversity, biogeography, and ecological flexibility. It refines our understanding of where Paranthropus lived, how widely it ranged, and how complex the early hominin landscape really was.

In other words, this is not a problem for evolution at all — it is a routine success story for it. The fossil record continues to grow, predictions continue to be borne out, and the messy, branching, occasionally hybridising reality of human evolution becomes ever clearer. What remains conspicuously absent, as ever, is any comparable explanatory framework from creationism — only a set of immovable dogmas that must be defended by denial, distortion, or special pleading whenever the evidence refuses to cooperate.

Once again, the facts turn out to be neutral referees in the dispute. And once again, they come down firmly on the side of an evidence-based, evolutionary account of our origins rather than on a handful of ancient origin myths that cannot be updated, tested, or corrected when they are shown to be wrong.




Advertisement

Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon


Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon


Amazon
Amazon
Amazon
Amazon

All titles available in paperback, hardcover, ebook for Kindle and audio format.

Prices correct at time of publication. for current prices.

Advertisement


Thank you for sharing!






Web Analytics