Bible Blunders - Why the Bible Could Not Have Been Written Or Inspired By The God Described In It

What happens when matter is squashed to the brink of collapse? We weighed a neutron star to help NASA find out

Assuming you could speak whatever ancient form of Hamito-Semitic language the Bronze Age authors of Genesis spoke; what do you think they would say if you asked them how to weigh a neutron star?

They might just about grasp the meaning of 'weigh' but 'neutron' and 'star', let alone 'neutron star'?

The plain fact is that we not only speak a different language but have words for ideas and objects which would have been incomprehensible to people who thought the entire Universe was a small, flat planet with a dome over it, that contained nothing that couldn’t be found within a day or two's walks of their pastures in the Middle Eastern petty state of Canaan, later to split up into even smaller waring tribal area under the leadership of despotic warlords.

You could have done the same with words like 'electricity', 'atom', bacteria', 'virus', 'genes', 'energy', 'galaxy', 'thermodynamics', 'chemistry', 'physics' and, of course 'evolution'. These are all as absent from the Bible as are elephants, penguins, north and south-poles, democracy, civil rights, or gender equality, because the authors knew nothing about them and had no way of knowing anything about them.

It wasn't that they were stupid, after all it probably takes a lot of intelligence and a long apprenticeship to understand the needs of a herd of sheep and/or goats and where the best grazing is without encroaching on the neighbouring tribes grazing rights. My dear old maternal grandfather was a highly-respected third-generation shepherd in his day who was head-hunted to look after a prize-winning flock of Oxford Downs and given a cottage to live in, that his family then lived in for four generations. He was by no means a stupid man - simplistic in his understanding of many things. A fundamentalist Christian who knew the Bible by heart and took everything in it as 'Gospel truth' and misogynistic to the core, but not stupid.

But they not only lacked the technology (how can you learn about bacteria when you don't have glass good enough to make a microscope) but they believed they knew the answers already. They thought they knew the answers to the questions their limited horizons suggested - and the answer was always the same - a god did it (which god or gods didn't matter, it was the god or gods the rest of the tribe believed in), so what would you want a microscope for? there is nothing in water that you can't see, except water. There is nothing over the earth but the dome with the sun and moon and stars fixed to it, so why would you need a telescope to find out about galaxies?

Refuting Creationism - A Surfeit of Lamprey Evolution

Jawless lamprey

Image by T. Lawrence,
Great Lakes Fishery Commission

Petromyzon marinus, an invasive species in the North American Great Lakes.

Lampreys possess a ‘jaw-dropping’ evolutionary origin - Northwestern Now

It's a basic delusion of the creation cult that evolutionary biologists are turning their backs on the Theory of Evolution in favour of their childish notion of magic by a magic creator for which there is not an iota of scientific evidence. This probably tells us more about the ignorant gullibility of their target dupes and the contempt in which they are held by the cult leaders, than creationist frauds would want us to know.

The lie is designed to fool creationists into thinking that their childish superstition is ahead of science because their abysmal ignorance of the subject gives them a better understanding of biology than people who have university degrees in the subject and who use it every working day to reveal new facts and develop new medicines or more efficient agriculture, or simply to reveal the truth about the world we live in.

Creationists have also been fooled into thinking these millions of working biomedical scientists, their research assistants and staff of research institutes, together with those who publish the science journals, are all lying to mislead people because they 'hate' the imaginary, unproven creator, and none of them has ever broken ranks and blown the whistle on the 'deception'.

Meanwhile, in the grown-up world outside the creationist rabbit hole, real scientists are discovering facts that show how evolution from common ancestors involves genetic changes, just the way the Theory of Evolution predicts.

Unintelligent Design - The Divine Loser - Or How Creationism's Divine Malevolence Was Just Too Clever

Structure of Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus

Ma, B., Huang, C., Ma, J. et al. (2021)

Evolution Tamed Once-Deadly Western Equine Encephalitis. Should We Still Worry? | Harvard Medical School

Creationism's divine malevolence is nothing if not sneaky and underhand, so we always need to be wary of what it is up to. For instance, following its early success with the western equine encephalitis virus (WEEV) in the early part of the 10th century, the virus seems to have lost its virulence and stopped infecting humans and horse, spending all its time in the body of the birds that were its reserve hiding places when it was at its most dangerous in the early 20th century.

The virus was spread by the divine malevolence’s favourite insect vector - mosquitoes, especially the usual suspects, the Culex and Aedes genera. In 1941 it accounted for3000 human cases with a mortality rate of 3-7%, but such has been its decline that there were only 600 human cases between 1964 and 2009 in the USA.

But is its designer merely biding its time and waiting for another chance to launch another attack on us, or is this an example of the malevolent designer being just a bit too clever, and having a plan that wasn't worth the paper on which it was written? We had a warning against complacency last year with an outbreak in Argentina and Uruguay with 2.400 horse cases and 103 human cases with a 10% morality rate in humans.

Malevonet Designer News - How Herpes Uses Sneak Tactics To Infect More People

[left caption]

[right caption]

Skin blisters caused by herpes zoster (shingles)

Suppression of the host antiviral response by non-infectious varicella zoster virus extracellular vesicles | Journal of Virology

If you're going to design pathogens to overcome the immune system and make people sick, it helps that you know the weaknesses of the immune system you designed earlier to protect people from the pathogens you design.

To devotees of creationism's divine malevolence, the sheer brilliance of its designs is breathtaking, but the question they always avoid is why did it design the immune system with so many flaws and weak points in the first place? Was that merely incompetence, or did it intend to exploit them.

The redness of the rash may not be apparent on black or brown skin.

Creationists also carefully avoid questions about why any intelligent designer would have these arms races with itself, like someone with multiple personality syndrome and amnesia who constantly forgets what it designed yesterday and designs a new solution to the same problem today, and who sees the solutions to problems it designed yesterday as new problems to be solved today.

This is the supposed designer that creationists call 'intelligent', and which they would rather people believe in than have them accept the materialist explanation - mindless evolution proceeding without a plan in which one organism with its strengths and weaknesses is merely part of another organism's environment, presenting opportunities and threats, and selectors which pushes the population of organisms in a direction which makes them better fitted to survive and produce the next generation.

Rash around the eyes can be painful and may affect sight and hearing.

Alas, the excuses creationists try to make for this appearance of incompetent stupidity in design that parasites provide us with when we look below the superficial - genetic entropy and the ludicrous notion of 'devolution' - is demonstrably nonsensical, since an advantageous mutation can't logically be described as 'devolutionary' or somehow less perfect than its predecessor without private definitions of the words, 'perfect' and 'better' to mean the exact opposite of what normal people mean by them.

The latest example of a parasite appearing to be designed to increase the suffering in the world by sneaking past the incompetently designed immune system, if you believe in the childish 'intelligent design' notion, is the way the herpes virus that causes chicken pox and shingles manages to spread throughout the body where it lies dormant until something like illness, old age or infirmity triggers it to reactivate an cause shingles.

Unintelligent Design News - When Genes Misbehave - Another Design Blunder?

'Preparing the popular film of a Taube soaring above Rheims cathedral'

W. Heath-Robinson (1915)

‘Gene misbehaviour’ widespread in healthy population

Creationism's putative designer is like William Heath Robinson but without the competence.

Like creationism's putative designer, William Heath Robinson's 'irreducibly complex' designs are ludicrously over-complicated solutions to simple problems, but at least Heath-Robinson's machines look as though they would work if ever anyone constructed one.

Designed by creationism's supposed omniscient, omnipotent designer the bits of knotted string used to connect things together, and originally designed for a different purpose altogether, would have knots that came undone, or they would be made of elastic, or the chair used to stand something on to make it tall enough would have a broken leg.

The problem starts with the clunky workaround for the problem caused by using the same method for replicating cells in a multicellular organism that is used in single-celled organisms where the entire genome has to be duplicated in each daughter cell. But in a multicellular organism, where there is cell specialisation to gain any benefit from multicellularity, each specialist cell only needs a few genes, so the rest have to be switched off. Creationism's divine incompetence came up with the usual overly complex solution to this problem of its own making in the form of the epigenetic system, adding an unnecessary layer of complexity when the simple solution would have been to give each specialist cell just the genes it needs and no more.

And this become even more complicated when, during the life of a multicellular organism, specialist cells need to change slightly according to the needs of the organism as a whole, so a system of signals had been devised to tell the cells when to switch on some genes and switch off others. Another layer of complexity, and this is where things start to go wrong - the equivalent of Heath-Robinson's knotted string coming undone or stretching, or the chair supporting the entire structure starting to buckle.

Scientists at the Wellcome Sanger Institute's Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK, Cambridge University and AstraZeneca have discovered that genes are sometimes active when they should be switched off, even in healthy people.

Malevolent Designer - It's A Frog Eat Frog World Out There!

Green and golden frog, Litoria aurea, female eating a juvenile striped marsh frog, Limnodynastes peronii

Gould, J., & Beranek, C. T. (2024). (CC BY 4.0)

Meal or mate: Exploring the evidence of sexual cannibalism among amphibians - Gould - 2024 - Ecology and Evolution - Wiley Online Library

Figure 2
Adult female green and golden bell frogs, Litoria aurea, preying on adult spotted marsh frogs, Limnodynastes tasmaniensis in proximity to an exclusion fence on Kooragang Island, NSW, Australia. The females can be seen swallowing their frog prey vent first, with the back legs already consumed.

Gould, J., & Beranek, C. T. (2024). (CC BY 4.0)

Creationists who try to pretend to be the moral superior of other people like to pretend their imaginary creator friend has provided them with a set of objective morals, although bearing false witness to trick others into agreeing with them - something that their Bible says is wrong and something most honest people would agree with, seem to be one of them, as does abusing their opponents and even threatening strangers, as these are all part of the set of 'objective morals' on display in any on-line creationist or creation vs evolution group.

But even if the claim of there being a set of objective moral which their god has handed down to them (and only them) had any merit, you would expect it to be true for all species, not restricted to human cultures. After all, if eating people is wrong, then you would expect cannibalism to be unknown in the animal kingdom, and yet it's commonplace.

Creationism Refuted - Why Did The 'Creator' Get It So Wrong?

Domestic animals

A sample of cultivated root crops.

The fundamental problem for creationists is their dependence on a book that can so easily shown to be wrong on almost every level. It's rather like taking an imaginative story made up by an uneducated 6-year-old to explain the world as he or she saw it and pointing out the errors in it.

Trivially easy, especially for someone with a little education, especially in the relevant subject like biology, geology, cosmology and history.

One of the more glaring errors is very early on in the Bible narrative which describes how a magic creator created all the animals for human use. It comes mostly from the first version of creation. In this version, the animals were all created before a man and a woman who were both created together, and then the animals and plants were all given to them for 'meat'.

In the second version, a man was created alone, then the animals, then a woman.

Obviously, both can be true, but it is mostly from the first version that creationists get the idea that all the animals and plants in the world were created especially for them. And that's where things begin to fall apart on close inspection of the facts.

Here is how the story goes. The first version:

Malevolent Designer - Now Creationism's Divine Malevolence Is Throwing New Versions Of SARS-CoV-2 At Us

LB.1, or D-FLiRT, is the newest COVID subvariant. What do we know about it? Where has it come from?

Creationism's divine malevolence is not giving up on its stunningly successful SARS-CoV-2 virus that killed millions, made hundreds of millions suffer and wrecked economies worldwide in the worst pandemic since its 'Spanish Lady' influenza pandemic of 1918-19.

Just because medical science produced the very effective mRNA vaccines against in in record time, bringing the pandemic under control, and its effects down to manageable proportions, is no reason to give up on it and admit defeat.

It is now designing ever more variants, some of which, like the latest, LB.1 (aka D-FLiRT) is currently surging in parts of the world, having succeeded XBB, JN.1, FLiRT and FLuQE.

How Sars-CoV-2 needs to keep infecting people, or it will become extinct as its supply of hosts dries up by becoming resistant to it. How it keeps on evolving to keep infecting people by overcoming natural and acquired immunity as vaccines are updated to try to keep up with it, is the subject of an article in The Conversation by Professor Adrian Esterman, Professor of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of South Australia. His article is reprinted here under a Creative Commons License, reformatted for stylistic consistency:

Malevolent Designer News - How To Make Hospital Patients Even Sicker

Klebsiella pneumoniae

Klebsiella aerogenes

Scientists identify possible new transmission factor in hospital-acquired Klebsiella infections - Forsyth

Creationism's divine malevolence is nothing if not ingenious in its determination to increase the suffering in the world with its specially designed pathogens - parasitic microorganisms such as bacteria that cause diseases, sickness and death.

And what better location for increasing suffering is there than a hospital where people are already unwell and easy victims for more infections with life-threatening pathogens?

One of the nastier examples of just such a pathogen is Klebsiella, and not content with one species, creationism's favourite sadist have designed two - Klebsiella pneumoniae and K. aerogenes, both of which are multi-resistant, i.e. resistant to multiple antibiotics and both of which actually thrive and multiply rapidly in conditions where other bacteria are being killed off with antibiotics.

Malevolent Design - The Brilliance of Dengue - Designed To Make Us Suffer More

The nuclei of mosquito cells appear in blue. The red and green signal indicates the presence of two dengue virus proteins

Top left: The nuclei of human cells appear in blue. The green signal indicates the presence of a dengue virus protein. Top right: The nuclei of human cells appear in teal. The magenta signal indicates the presence of a dengue virus protein. Bottom left: The nuclei of human cells appear in grey. The red signal indicates the presence of a dengue virus protein. Bottom right: The nuclei of mosquito cells appear in blue. The red and green signal indicates the presence of two dengue virus proteins.

Exposing dengue’s invasion… | Stowers Institute for Medical Research

Today it's the turn of researchers at Oklahoma's Stowers Institute for Medical Research to expose the brilliance of creationism's divine malevolence in the way it's designed the Dengue virus to enable it to spread out of the tropics and infect more people. Currently, according to the World Health Oragnisation, the mosquito-borne virus, infects around 400 million people a year and there is no cure.

The Stowers Institute team led by Predoctoral Researcher Luciana Castellano in the lab of Associate Investigator Ariel Bazzini, Ph.D., has discovered how it, and hundreds of other viruses, replicate in their hosts.

Creationism't intelligent designer, for those who believe in magic, uses it's tried and tested mosquito delivery system, especially the Aedes eagypti mosquito which it used so successfully to spread the Zika virus to cause microcephaly in children.

The sneaky trick it used to get past the immune system it allegedly designed to protect us from things like its viruses, is breathtaking in its simplicity. In order to replicate inside a host cell, the virus needs some specific protein enzymes. It has the RNA code for these enzymes, but the problem is, the host's immune system would recognise those as foreign and launch an attack, so the virus uses the hosts enzymes. Proteins are coded for with a three-nucleotide code, one for each amino acid in the chain. However, the same amino acid can be coded for by several different triplet codes, some of which are more efficient than others. To ensure the cell makes its own enzymes for the virus, the virus uses less efficient codons in its own RNA!
This way, the virus tricks the cell into cooperating in its own destruction.

Neat, eh?

It's a classic example of how an apparently deleterious mutation works in favour of a parasite, and something creationists will find impossible to explain away with the biologically nonsensical 'genetic entropy' causing 'devolution' because the mutation was undoubtedly evolutionary, enabling the dengue virus (DENV) to produce very many more copies of itself than before, and something better can't be less perfect than the original.

Creationism in Crisis - Decline in Creationism in USA is Accelerating While Acceptance of Evolution Increases

Majority Still Credits God for Humankind, but Not Creationism Evidence of the continuing decline in creationism, which coincides with increased access to the Internet and exposure to creationist fundamentalists, was published by Gallop today.

The percentage of American adults who believe in creationism has fallen to a new low of just 37% (a figure which would be astonishingly high for most of the developed world where creationists languish in the lower few percentiles) while those who believe God played no part in the evolution of humans from less advanced life forms has risen to a new high of 24%.

The equivalent figures for 1999 were 47% and 9% respectively, and the signs are that these changes are accelerating.

Although correlation is not proof of causation, it is evidence of correlation and there is a strong correlation between access to the Internet (and so exposure of creationism to critical analysis, and exposure of the hypocrisy and inherent intellectual dishonesty of most creationists). This exposure has revealed that many creationists are using it as an excuse to pose as the superior of other people.

The arrogant assumption that the Universe was created with them in mind and that they have a special relationship with the creator of everything, so this provides an excuse to pose as more expert than the experts, without the bother of learning.

Good News For Creationists - Evidence That The Bible Is Hopelessly Wrong Has Been Destroyed

The first published results from Juukan Gorge show 47,000 years of Aboriginal heritage was destroyed in mining blast

On of the first pieces of good news for the creation cult emerged from Australia a couple of days ago. It was that one of the best pieces of evidence of continuous human occupation with no signs of ever being submerged in a flood, has been destroyed by mining activities.

It was an ancient rock shelter at Juukan Gorge in Puutu Kunti Kurrama Country in the Pilbara region of Western Australia, which had evidence of human occupation going back 47,000 years, i.e. 37,000 years before Bible literalist creationists believe the Universe was magicked up out of nothing, and 43,000 before it was supposedly submerged in deep flood water that would have obliterated any trace of human habitation.

It was the kind of solid, incontrovertible evidence of biblical errancy that keeps creationist cult leaders awake at night trying to make up lies to tell about it or discredit it in some way that a creationist will believe (not hard; just say the scientists hate God and make up lies, that'll make a creationist feel special).

How the site came to be destroyed and the attempts to recover the artifacts it contained is the subject of an article in The Conversation by Michael Slack, Director, Scarp Archaeology and Adjunct Associate Professor of Archaeology, James Cook University; Jordan Ralph, Adjunct Lecturer, Archaeology, Flinders University and Wallace Boone Law, Postdoctoral Researcher, Geospatial Science and Archaeology, University of Adelaide. Their article is reprinted here under a Creative Commons license, reformatted for stylistic consistency:

Refuting Creationism - Evolution Observed As Killifish On Trinidad Respond To Predation

A stream in Trinidad, typical killifish habitat

Killifish are highly adaptable to their surroundings

Fish adjust reproduction in response to predators - News Center - The University of Texas at Arlington

The killifish on the Caribbean island of Trinidad are ideal subjects for studying evolution because they can quickly adapt to environmental change. Some have even become amphibious, spending time out of water, probably to avoid predation, while others lay their eggs out of water on damp moss as an evolved adaptation to predation. However, eggs out of water bear the additional risk of desiccation which needs to be balanced against the risk of predation in water.

This paper by Professor Matthew R. Walsh, a biology professor at the University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA and his laboratory technician, Christopher Roden shows that the eggs of fish that lay them out of water hatch earlier than those in water, reducing the risk of desiccation, showing how predation has driven a change in the rate of embryo development to reduce the risk of desiccation, while avoiding predation.

Their findings are published open access in Proceedings of the Royal Society B and explained in the University of Texas press release:

Refuting Creationism - The Bible Is Nonsense - So 42 Million-Year-Old Amber Tells Us

Spider attacking a wasp. Myanmar
(100 million years old)

Image credit: Dr. George Poinar Jr.
Earth Archives

Rare parasitic wasp.

Maria Blake

Australian amber has revealed ‘living fossils’ traced back to Gondwana 42 million years ago

Amber is especially good for preserving in exquisite details, small arthropods which don't fossilise well in rocks, like larger vertebrates with hard body parts, and we can be confident that the age of the fossil is the age of the amber in which it is preserved.

Some years ago, on holiday in Kassandria, Greece, I came across a small group of Mediterranean pines that were being use to collect the resin used to flavour the local wine, Retsina. This wine is something of an acquired taste but is best drunk chilled, with Greek food, on a warm summer evening at sunset, overlooking the Aegean - and probably after a bottle or two of Demestica.

The fascinating thing was how many ants had managed to get themselves trapped in the resin in the plastic containers it was draining into from the cuts in the tree bark.

There were so many that I can only assume that when ancient amber was being produced there were either fewer ants or less resin.

So, what can we tell from the fossils preserved in amber?

Partly from their occurrence in amber, we know that some 85% of all living species were arthropods, rather than the 0.3% of species that were the much more noticeable vertebrates. We can also tell where and when major orders evolved and how long some of them have existed for. Since amber is formed from tree resin, it follows that it only occurred after trees evolved and from the resin produced by specific species of tree in areas where these trees grew.

Refuting Creationism - Hibernating Social Snakes - 38 Million Years Before 'Creation Week'

Fossilized skeleton of Hibernophis breithaupti,
which lived 38 million years ago

Photo: Jasmine Croghan

Newly discovered snake species provides insight into reptile social behaviour and development | Folio

The discovery of the new snake species has yielded insights into the evolution of modern snakes like the Amazon tree boa (left) and scrub python (right).

Photos: Michael Lee, Flinders University/South Australian Museum.

Red-sided garter snakes hibernate together in a hibernaculum.

Photo: Greg Schechter via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0

A new paper published in the Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society should give creationists cause to wonder if the people who wrote their favourite creation myth knew what they were talking about. That's assuming they have enough courage and intellectual integrity to consider that evidence trumps superstition and not the other way round, which is a big ask for most creationists as it would also mean their mummy and daddy could have been wrong too.

The evidence the new paper reveals is that of a collection of fossilised snakes found in Oligocene rocks in western Wyoming are those of a new species from 38 million years before creationists believe the Universe was created out of nothing by magic, when snakes had legs and could talk, and didn't have to eat nothing but dust [sic].

Refuting Creationism - Evolution By Hybridization May Be Commonplace in Plants

DR Lionel Di Santo samples black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa in the coastal regions of the Pacific Northwest.

Credit: Penn State. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

The team found the black cottonwood-balsam poplar stable hybrid lineage after analyzing the genetic makeup of 546 poplar tree cuttings collected along seven transects ranging from Alaska to Wyoming, with collections in British Columbia and Alberta, Canada, in between.

Credit: Penn State. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Discovery of a hybrid lineage offers clues to how trees adapt to climate change | Penn State University

Despite creationist dogma that say otherwise, evolution in a population can occur by hybridization, especially in plants, where it may be commonplace. Two related plants hybridize and the resulting offspring acquires additional combinations of genes which extend its capabilities, enabling it to survive environmental change or move into new niches, and forming a stable population with new allele frequencies.

And as though to rub salt into creationist wounds, some of these happened hundreds of thousands of years before creationism's legendary 'Creation Week', before which, on the say-so of some ignorant Bronze Age pastoralists who were unaware of anything more than a day or two's walk from the Canaanite Hills, creationists think there was once nothing out of which everything was created by some magic words, just a few thousand years ago.

They also hold the diametrically opposite views simultaneously, that evolution is impossible because the Second Law of Thermodynamics [sic] forbids it, and that evolution occurred as a massively accelerated rate in the last few thousand years, unnoticed by anyone, in which several whole new species arose in a single generation by magic.

Now a team led by Penn State University paleobotanists led by Associate Professor Jill Hamilton, from Penn State’s College of Agricultural Sciences, have shown that a hybrid between black cottonwood, or Populus trichocarpa, and balsam poplar, Populus balsamifera, was able to move out of the wet coastal region to which most black cottonwood trees are restricted, into the arid lands to the east. This movement started about 800,000 years ago.

Antivaxxer CCOVIDiot News - How COVID Vaccines Reduced The Risk of Long Covid

The risk of long COVID has declined over the course of the pandemic, although it remains a persistent threat. Researchers from Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis identified vaccination as a primary factor in reducing the risk of long COVID.

Risk of long COVID declined over course of pandemic – Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

According to a report published today by scientists from Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, the risk of contracting long COVID after an infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus fell significantly when people were vaccinated. This was true for both the Delta and Omicron strains as well as for original.

The researchers attribute almost 72% of this reduction to the vaccines and the rest to changes in the SARS-CoV-2 virus and improved detection and management of infected patients. Their results are published in the New England Journal of Medicine and in a Washington University School of Medicine new release:

Creationism Refuted - How Rotifers Acquire New Genetic Information - No God(s) Needed

This rotifer has just survived a life-threatening infection. When a fungal disease attacked, she switched on hundreds of genes that her ancestors copied from microbes, including antibiotic recipes stolen from bacteria.

Credit:
C.G. Wilson, 2019

Small Animals Acquire Genes from Bacteria that Can Produce Antibiotics | Marine Biological Laboratory

Bdelloid rotifers, about a hair's width in size, are the only animals known to acquire a large number of genes from their environment (from bacteria, even plants). This study indicates they use some of those genes to resist disease.

Credit: C.G. Wilson

Q. Why are creationists obsessed with attacking science, but scientists are supremely indifferent to creationism?

A. Because creationism isn't a problem for science, but science is a problem for creationism.

Like just about every serious biologist publishing their research findings, refuting creationism was probably not even in the thinking of the biologists from University of Oxford, the University of Stirling and the Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL), Woods Hole, Mass, USA, when they published their paper on how a type of rotifer resists fungal infections, but that's what they've just done.

It's a basic article of faith for creationists, promulgated by frauds who misrepresent information theory and conflate it with the laws of thermodynamics that an organism cannot acquire new genetic information without the intervention of a supernatural deity (who just happens to be the locally popular god as revealed in the locally popular books deemed to be holy by the locally popular church, mosque, synagogue, temple or gurdwara} because that would violate some assumed law akin to the law of conservation of energy - which has nothing to do with information or genetics

It is of course nonsense, as the evidence of gene and whole genome doubling, and horizontal gene transfer shows. Organisms can acquire new genetic information by simple chemistry and physics; and that new information is often available to be exapted for novel purposes.

Refuting Creationism - Humans Were Butchering A Giant Armadillo in Argentina - 11,000 Years Before 'Creation Week'

21,000-year-old Neoesclerocalyptus fossils with man-made cut marks

UNLP scientists discover the oldest record of human presence in South America » UNLP

It's one of those moments that creationists like to pretend is a weakness of science - time to reconsider what we thought we knew and to update our understanding in the light of new evidence.

In short, time to do what a dogmatic, intellectually bankrupt creationist can never do - consider being wrong and changing our mind because the evidence has changed.

The reason for this reassessment is that the fossilised remains of a species of glyptodont or giant armadillo, a Neoesclerocalyptus, has been discovered on the bank of the Reconquista River, in Argentina that have been dated to 21,000 years ago, that bears the unmistakable cut marks of butchery by humans. Previously, the earliest incontrovertible evidence of humans in South America put it at about 16,000 years ago. The fossils were discovered and analysed by a team of palaeontologists led by scientists from the National University of La Plata, Argentina.

This is a clear 11,000 years before creationists believe the Universe was magicked into existence, and so puts this event in the 99.9975% of Earth's history that occurred before creationists believe it existed, based on the best guesses of parochial Middle-eastern pastoralists who believe the entire universe consisted of a small flat planet with a dome over it that contained nothing that wasn't known to the people who filled the gap in their knowledge with childish guesses.

Refuting Creationisn - Understanding Consciousness - No God(s) Required

Study reveals how an anesthesia drug induces unconsciousness | MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology

One of creationism beloved gaps in which they try to shoehorn their ever-shrinking little god, is a scientific explanation for consciousness.

It is true that we don't yet have an explanation for consciousness but no gap in the scientific understanding of anything has ever been filled by a god, or to be more scientific, by an unproven, undetectable supernatural entity, so it's a strangely unrealistic view of science that any (or all) of creationism's gaps, real or imaginary are going to be the exception to the rule and somehow, one day, science is going to reveal the locally popular god in all its glory, having managed to hide itself for millennia.

Being inherently unfalsifiable, of course, there is no possible scientific methodology that could reveal any specified god as the indisputable cause of any phenomenon, so creationist belief that this is about to happen is delusional.

But back to the problem of consciousness.

Refuting Creationism - A Burrowing Dinosaur - 99 Million Years Before 'Creation Week'

Fona herzogae.

Credit: Jorge Gonzalez.

Fona herzogae.

Credit: Jorge Gonzales

Life Underground Suited New Dinosaur Fine | NC State News

If you want to leave a fossil as evidence of your existence, live, or at least die, in a burrow.

If you want to refute creationism, arrange to die 99 million years before they believe the Universe existed.

That's what an otherwise unremarkable dinosaur that was about the size of a large dog, contrived to do in what is now Utah, USA. It, and its relatives, because so many of them died in their borrows, are preserved in exception detail compared to species that lived above ground where their bodies would have been scavenged and destroyed before they could be fossilised.

Creationism Refuted - Stardust Creation 1,300 Years Before 'Creation Week'

Cassiopeia A

JWST

Cassiopeia A

JWST Unveils Stunning Ejecta and CO Structures in Cassiopeia A's Young Supernova

Todays' refutation of creationism comes to us from the field of astronomy and in particular the details of what happened and is still happening in the expanding supernova remnant known as Cassiopeia A which has a super-dense body at its centre, probably a neutron star, the collapsed remains of the parent star.

A neutron star is the remains of an old star that was too large to collapse to a white dwarf but not large enough to become a black hole. In a neutron star, the pressure due to gravity is so intense that even atoms compress, and electrons are forced into protons to become neutrons, so the star becomes nothing but neutrons. Due to conservation of angular momentum a neutron star has a rotation rate in seconds or less.

Cassiopeia A (Cas A) was observed in the night sky 350 years ago. It is 11,000 light years away, so the light the explosion generated reached Earth 11,000 years after the explosion, which simple maths tells us happened 1,350 years before creationists think the Universe was created. It was of course an event in that long, 13.8 billion years pre-'Creation' history of the Universe when 99.99999% of its history, and 99.9975% of the history of Earth occurred.

A supernova like Cas A is the birthplace of star dust out of which Earth and everything on it is made. It is the stuff that connects us to the rest of the universe and to which we, or rather the atoms and molecules that we are made of, will return to be recycled into future planets around future suns, when our own sun swallows up the inner planets then goes supernova itself, and flings our atoms out into the cosmos to be recycled as new suns and planetary systems, maybe to be studied by cosmologists on some other planet wondering about that sudden flash of light in the Milky Way, that was the death of our sun.

As I said in What Makes You So Special? From the Big Bang to You:

Stars died and because they died, you live. You are made by stars out of stardust and in a very real sense; because you are made of the same stuff the Universe is made of and are a part of it, there is something even more wonderful about you. Through you, though not just through you, and maybe not just here on this small planet, the Universe has gained self–awareness and can begin to understand itself.

Through you it can stand on the surface of this beautiful little jewel in the cosmos, can look up in awe at itself and think "Wow!"

What Makes You So Special? From the Big Bang to You, page 152

Secular Humanism - Winning In Britain - Highest Number of MPs Ever Make A Secular Affirmation

300 MPs from the 2024 Parliament.

© House of Commons/Mark Crick.
Crown Copyright and CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Kier Starmer Labour Prime Minister and the latest in a long line of non-religious UK PMs

Highest number of MPs ever take secular affirmation – Humanists UK

An under-reported fact following the landslide victory for the Labour Party at the last election was the massively increased number of MPs in the Commons who have no religion. Roughly 40% of MPs chose to make a secular affirmation rather than swear a religious oath on taking their seats. This included Sir Kier Starmer and 50% of his cabinet ministers.

The list of openly non-religious Prime Ministers ever since the 1888 when the law requiring all MPs to take a religious oath was abolished, includes Ramsay McDonald, first Labour PM and former president of Humanists UK, David Lloyd George, Neville Chamberlain, Winston Churchill, Clement Atlee and James Callaghan. It is almost exactly 100 years since Ramsay McDonald became the first PM to make a secular affirmation in 1924.

According to Humanists UK:

Antivaxxer Disinformation News - Flu-Like Symptoms After Vaccination Show The Vaccine is Working

COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects and Long-Term Neutralizing Antibody Response: A Prospective Cohort Study: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 0, No 0

According to data published in Annals of Internal Medicine, people who experience flu-like symptoms - chills, tiredness, headaches, and feeling unwell, after a COVID mRNA vaccination tend to have a higher antibody count. This was based on a prospective cohort study of 363 participants from the San Fransico Bay area of California, US, who were vaccinated in 2021 and self-reported their symptoms.

Those who reported these symptoms had antibody levels about 1.5 time those of people who had no such symptoms after 1 month and at least 6 months after vaccination. In addition to those with self-reported symptoms, comparable results were found in 147 people who were objectively assessed for elevated skin temperature and increased heart rate.

The conclusion is that rather than acting as a deterrent, these symptoms should not be a deterrent but should be welcomed as evidence that the vaccine has worked.

More details are given in the report in Annals of Internal Medicine: